• CSCD核心库收录期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊

电力建设 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 18-22.

• 输配电技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

500 kV同塔四回输电线路竖塔与横塔耐雷性能比较

苏菲1,周浩2,沈志恒1,赵斌财1   

  1. 1. 浙江大学电气工程学院
    2. 浙江大学
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-19 修回日期:2011-08-03 出版日期:2011-10-01 发布日期:2011-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 苏菲 E-mail:ssufei@gmail.com

Lightning Withstand Performance Comparison Between Vertical Tower and Horizontal Tower in 500 kV Transmission Lines with Four-circuit on a Tower

  • Received:2011-05-19 Revised:2011-08-03 Online:2011-10-01 Published:2011-10-03

摘要:

同塔四回输电线路随着线路回数的增加,铁塔高度和横担宽度较单回线增加明显,杆塔塔型对线路的耐雷水平有较大的影响。为了正确评估500 kV同塔四回线路横塔和竖塔的耐雷水平,采用改进电气几何模型(electric geometry method,EGM)与电磁暂态程序(elector-magnetic transient program,EMTP),对比了2种杆塔在不同的地面倾角以及杆塔接地电阻下的耐雷性能,对三避雷线与单耦合地线的防雷效果进行了研究。计算结果表明,横塔的耐雷性能明显优于竖塔,建议在雷害严重地区或是山区采用横塔,在线路走廊紧张地区采用竖塔。

关键词: 500 kV线路, 同塔四回, 耐雷性能, 耦合地线

Abstract:

With the increment of circuit number in the transmission lines with four-circuit on a tower, the height and width of tower would increase obviously, which could largely influence the lightning withstand performance of the line. In order to accurately assess the lightning withstand performance of both horizontal and vertical tower, the improved electric geometry method(EGM)model and elector-magnetic transient program (EMTP)are applied to calculate the lightning withstand performance of the two tower type under different ground dip angel and grounding resistance. The results show that the lightning performance of horizontal tower is much better than the vertical one. Therefore, it is highly recommended that horizontal tower be applied in mountain area or serious lightning area, while the vertical tower be applied in the area where the line corridor is scarce.

Key words: 500 kV transmission line, four-circuit on a tower, lightning withstand performance, coupling earth wire