基于主从博弈的区域综合能源服务商运行策略

doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2021.01.002

电力建设 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 10-10.doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2021.01.002

• 泛在物联环境下综合能源系统的市场化交易运行·栏目主持高赐威教授、冯冬涵教授、薛飞副教授· • 上一篇下一篇

基于主从博弈的区域综合能源服务商运行策略

李东东¹, 周冠廷¹, 李宽宏², 林顺富¹^,³, 段维伊¹, 沈运帷¹

1.上海电力大学院电气工程学院,上海市200090
2.国网福建省电力有限公司福州供电公司,福州市 350009
3.上海市教委高效电能应用工程研究中心,上海市 200090

收稿日期:2020-08-12 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-01-07
通讯作者: 周冠廷
作者简介:李东东(1976),男,博士,教授,研究方向为风力发电与电力系统稳定控制、智能用电;|李宽宏(1992),男,硕士,工程师,主要研究方向为电力系统调度自动化、配电自动化、配电运维检修等;|林顺富(1983),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为电能质量分析及智能电网用户端技术;|段维伊(1994),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为智能用电;|沈运帷(1992),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向为需求响应和电力市场。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51977127);上海市教育委员会和上海市教育发展基金会“晨光计划”(17CG56);上海市科学技术委员会地方院校能力建设项目(19020500800)

Operation Strategy of Regional Integrated Energy Service Providers Applying Master-Slave Game

LI Dongdong¹, ZHOU Guanting¹, LI Kuanhong², LIN Shunfu¹^,³, DUAN Weiyi¹, SHEN Yunwei¹

1. College of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China
2. State Grid Fuzhou Electric Power Supply Company, Fuzhou 350009,China
3. Shanghai Higher Institution Engineering Research Center of High Efficiency Application, Shanghai 200090,China

Received:2020-08-12 Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-01-07
Contact: ZHOU Guanting
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(51977127);Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation “Morning Project”(17CG56);Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission’s Local College Capacity Building Project(19020500800)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着电力系统转型的不断推进,区域综合能源服务商(regional integrated energy service provider,RIESP)由传统的自上而下无竞争的垄断模式向多方竞争模式转变。文章综合考虑了RIESP自身发电成本及用户购能满意度,提出了一种基于主从博弈的RIESP运行策略模型。首先,介绍了RIESP的基本架构及两步式决策机制,建立了以RIESP运行利润最大为领导者目标函数和用户消费剩余最大为跟随者目标函数的主从博弈模型。然后,证明了模型Stackelberg均衡解的存在性和唯一性,并采用基于差分进化和粒子群(differential evolution- particle swarm optimization,DE-PSO)的混合算法进行求解。最后,通过仿真算例验证了所提策略的有效性,结果证明,RIESP收益及用户消费剩余均有所提升。

关键词: 区域综合能源服务商(RIESP), 运行策略, 两步式决策, 主从博弈

Abstract:

With the continuous advancement of power system transformation, the regional integrated energy service provider (RIESP) has changed from a traditional top-down monopoly model without competition to a multi-party competition model. This paper comprehensively considers power generation cost of RIESP and user purchase satisfaction, and proposes a RIESP operation strategy model based on master-slave game. Firstly, the basic structure of RIESP and the two-step decision-making mechanism are introduced, and a master-slave game model is established, in which the maximum profit of RIESP is the leader objective function and the maximum user consumption surplus is the follower objective function. Then, the existence and uniqueness of the Stackelberg equilibrium solution of the model are proved, and the DE-PSO hybrid algorithm is used to solve it. Finally, through simulation examples, the effectiveness of the strategy proposed in this paper is verified, and both the revenue of RIESP and the surplus of user consumption are improved.

Key words: regional integrated energy service provider(RIESP), operation strategy, two-step decision-making, master-slave game

中图分类号:

TM711

李东东, 周冠廷, 李宽宏, 林顺富, 段维伊, 沈运帷. 基于主从博弈的区域综合能源服务商运行策略[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(1): 10-10.

LI Dongdong, ZHOU Guanting, LI Kuanhong, LIN Shunfu, DUAN Weiyi, SHEN Yunwei. Operation Strategy of Regional Integrated Energy Service Providers Applying Master-Slave Game[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 42(1): 10-10.

图/表 10

图1 区域综合能源系统能量流

Fig.1 Energy flow of the regional integrated energy system

图2 区域综合能源服务商运营架构

Fig.2 Operational structure of RIESP

图3 DE-PSO算法流程

Fig.3 Algorithm flow of DE-PSO

图4 RIESP购能的电价与天然气价

Fig.4 Purchase price of electricity and natural gas for RIESP

图5 Holt-winter预测数据图

Fig.5 Holt-winter prediction data graph

图6 迭代收敛曲线图

Fig.6 Iterative convergence curve

图7 RIESP售电策略和设备运行状态

Fig.7 RIESP power-sales strategy and equipment operation status

图8 用户用电策略和负荷调整曲线

Fig.8 User power-consumption strategy and load adjustment curve

图9 RIESP售电策略和设备运行状态(无P2G和储能)

Fig.9 RIESP power-sales strategy and equipment operation status (without P2G and storage)

图10 用户用电策略和负荷调整曲线(无P2G和储能)

Fig.10 User power-consumption strategy and load adjustment curve (without P2G and storage)

参考文献 24

[1]	周孝信, 陈树勇, 鲁宗相 , 等. 能源转型中我国新一代电力系统的技术特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018,38(7):1893-1904.
	ZHOU Xiaoxin, CHEN Shuyong, LU Zongxiang , et al. Technology features of the new generation power system in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018,38(7):1893-1904.
[2]	贾宏杰, 王丹, 徐宪东 , 等. 区域综合能源系统若干问题研究[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015,39(7):198-207.
	JIA Hongjie, WANG Dan, XU Xiandong , et al. Research on some key problems related to integrated energy systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015,39(7):198-207.
[3]	封红丽 . 国内外综合能源服务发展现状及商业模式研究[J]. 电器工业, 2017(6):34-42.
	FENG Hongli . Study on the development status and business model of comprehensive energy services at home and abroad[J].Electrical Appliance Industry, 2017(6):34-42.
[4]	吴建中 . 欧洲综合能源系统发展的驱动与现状[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016,40(5):1-7.
	WU Jianzhong . The driving force and status quo of European integrated energy system development[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016,40(5):1-7.
[5]	贾宏杰, 王丹, 徐宪东 , 等. 区域综合能源系统若干问题研究[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015,39(7):198-207.
	JIA Hongjie, WANG Dan, XU Xiandong , et al. Study on several issues of regional integrated energy system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015,39(7):198-207.
[6]	刘峻, 郑晶晶 . 基于价值网的电网公司综合能源服务商业模式探讨[J]. 商业经济, 2020(2):121-123.
[7]	龚钢军, 王慧娟, 杨晟 , 等. 区块链技术下综合能源服务研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020,40(5):1397-1402.
	GONG Gangjun, WANG Huijuan, YANG Sheng , et al. Research on comprehensive energy services under blockchain technology[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020,40(5):1397-1402.
[8]	李昊飞, 余涛, 瞿凯平 , 等. 综合负荷聚合商参与配电-气能源系统供需互动均衡模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019,43(19):32-45.
	LI Haofei, YU Tao, QU Kaiping , et al. Interactive equilibrium supply and demand model for electricity-gas energy distribution system with participation of integrated load aggregators[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019,43(19):32-45.
[9]	李鹏, 王子轩, 侯磊 , 等. 基于重复博弈的区域综合能源系统优化运行分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019,43(14):81-93.
	LI Peng, WANG Zixuan, HOU Lei , et al. Analysis of repeated game based optimal operation for regional integrated energy system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019,43(14):81-93.
[10]	秦文萍, 逯瑞鹏, 高蒙楠 , 等. 计及大规模新能源接入的电-气耦合综合能源系统稳定性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2020,44(5):1880-1891.
	QIN Wenping, TONG Ruipeng, GAO Mengnan , et al. Stability evaluation of electric-pneumatic coupling comprehensive energy system considering large-scale new energy access[J] . Power System Technology, 2020,44(5):1880-1891.
[11]	GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ R A, LEITE DA SILVA A M, RESENDE L C , et al. Composite systems reliability evaluation based on Monte Carlo simulation and cross-entropy methods[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013,28(4):4598-4606. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2267154 URL
[12]	周晟锐, 刘继春, 张浩禹 , 等. 基于机会约束的多能源枢纽电气互联综合能源系统日前经济调度[J]. 现代电力, 2020,37(2):197-204.
	ZHOU Shengrui, LIU Jichun, ZHANG Haoyu , et al. Day-ahead economic dispatch for electricity-gas integrated energy system with multiple energy hubs based on chance constraints[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2020,37(2):197-204.
[13]	顾洁, 白凯峰, 时亚军 . 基于多主体主从博弈优化交互机制的区域综合能源系统优化运行[J]. 电网技术, 2019,43(9):3119-3134.
	GU Jie, BAI Kaifeng, SHI Yajun . Optimized operation of regional integrated energy system based on multi-agent master-slave game optimization interaction mechanism[J]. Power System Technology, 2019,43(9):3119-3134.
[14]	黄伟, 葛良军, 华亮亮 , 等. 参与双重市场的区域综合能源系统日前优化调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019,43(12):68-82.
	HUANG Wei, GE Liangjun, HUA Liangliang , et al. Day-ahead optimal scheduling of regional integrated energy system participating in dual market[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019,43(12):68-82.
[15]	杨皓钦, 魏震波, 黄宇涵 , 等. 跨区域现货市场下多主体购售能主从博弈模型[J]. 电网技术, 2019,43(8):2781-2791.
	YANG Haoqin, WEI Zhenbo, HUANG Yuhan , et al. Multi-agent purchase and sale master-slave game model in cross-regional spot market[J]. Power System Technology, 2019,43(8):2781-2791.
[16]	甘宇翔, 蒋传文, 白宏坤 , 等. 市场环境下园区售电商的最优报价和运行优化[J]. 电网技术, 2018,42(3):707-715.
	GAN Yuxiang, JIANG Chuanwen, BAI Hongkun , et al. Optimal bidding strategy and operation of industrial park electricity retailer in electricity market[J]. Power System Technology, 2018,42(3):707-715.
[17]	李媛, 冯昌森, 文福拴 , 等. 含电动汽车和电转气的园区能源互联网能源定价与管理[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018,42(16):1-10.
	LI Yuan, FENG Changsen, WEN Fushuan , et al. Energy pricing and management for park-level energy internets with electric vehicles and power-to-gas devices[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018,42(16):1-10.
[18]	马丽, 刘念, 张建华 , 等. 基于主从博弈策略的社区能源互联网分布式能量管理[J]. 电网技术, 2016,40(12):3655-3662.
	MA Li, LIU Nian, ZHANG Jianhua , et al. Distributed energy management of community energy Internet based on leader-followers game[J]. Power System Technology, 2016,40(12):3655-3662.
[19]	周长城, 马溪原, 郭晓斌 , 等. 基于主从博弈的工业园区综合能源系统互动优化运行方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019,43(7):74-84.
	ZHOU Changcheng, MA Xiyuan, GUO Xiaobin , et al. Leader-follower game based optimized operation method for interaction of integrated energy system in industrial park[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019,43(7):74-84.
[20]	吴利兰, 荆朝霞, 吴青华 , 等. 基于Stackelberg博弈模型的综合能源系统均衡交互策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018,42(4):142-150, 207.
	WU Lilan, JING Zhaoxia, WU Qinghua , et al. Equilibrium strategies for integrated energy systems based on stackelberg game model[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018,42(4):142-150, 207.
[21]	董帅, 王成福, 梁军 , 等. 计及电转气运行成本的综合能源系统多目标日前优化调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018,42(11):8-15, 121.
	DONG Shuai, WANG Chengfu, LIANG Jun , et al. Multi-objective optimal day-ahead dispatch of integrated energy system considering power-to-gas operation cost[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018,42(11):8-15, 121.
[22]	王海洋, 李珂, 张承慧 , 等. 基于主从博弈的社区综合能源系统分布式协同优化运行策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020,40(17):5435-5445.
	WANG Haiyang, LI Ke, ZHANG Chenghui , et al. Distributed coordinative optimal operation of community integrated energy system based on stackelberg game[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020,40(17):5435-5445.
[23]	方燕琼, 甘霖, 艾芊 , 等. 基于主从博弈的虚拟电厂双层竞标策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017,41(14):61-69.
	FANG Yanqiong, GAN Lin, AI Qian , et al. Stackelberg game based bi-level bidding strategy for virtual power plant[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017,41(14):61-69.
[24]	张俊娜 . 粒子群优化算法的改进与应用[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2017.
	ZHANG Junna . Modification and application of particle swarm optimization algorithm[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2017

基于主从博弈的区域综合能源服务商运行策略

Operation Strategy of Regional Integrated Energy Service Providers Applying Master-Slave Game

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 24

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓强，詹红霞，杨孝华，梅哲，张豪，朱金龙. 直购电背景下利用储能配合旋转备用的风电并网容量优化[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(4): 98-109.
[2]	李凌昊，邱晓燕，张楷，刘梦依，赵长枢. 考虑多负荷聚集商参与的系统日前-日内分层优化调度策略[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(12): 70-79.
[3]	魏震波，刘梁豪，关翔友. 计及社交网络关系的社区型能源互联网运营模拟分析[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(10): 36-44.
[4]	梅哲, 詹红霞, 苑吉河, 黄虎, 张曦, 邓强. V2G模式下基于电动汽车分群方法的配电网多目标优化运行策略[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(8): 59-68.