月刊
ISSN 1000-7229
CN 11-2583/TM
电力建设 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 10-24.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2014.04.003
郭剑1,2,陈继良1,2,曹文炅1,2,蒋方明1,2
出版日期:
2014-04-01
作者简介:
郭剑 (1985),男,工学博士,主要从事强化换热技术、增强型地热系统方面的研究工作,E-mail:guojian@ms.giec.ac.cn;
陈继良 (1989),男,硕士研究生,主要从事增强型地热系统研究工作;
曹文炅 (1983),男,工学博士,主要从事增强型地热系统、复杂热流体系统的数值方法及模型等方面的研究工作;
蒋方明 (1973),男,工学博士,主要从事增强型地热系统研发,先进电池(包括燃料电池、锂电池等)水、热管理,复杂热流体系统的数值方法及模型等方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(863计划)(2012AA052802);国家自然科学基金项目(51206174);广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(S2013040013967)。
GUO Jian1,2, CHEN Jiliang1,2, CAO Wenjiong1,2, JIANG Fangming1,2
Online:
2014-04-01
摘要:
随着全球范围日益严重的能源和环境危机,寻找环境友好型的新型清洁能源成为世界各国的研究焦点。地热能具有稳定、连续、利用系数高等优点,增强型地热系统(enhanced geothermal system,EGS)作为资源丰富的新型清洁能源正在获得世界各国的广泛关注。目前EGS的研究方法主要有:(1)建立野外试验场进行直接的工程实践研究;(2)通过数值模拟进行理论分析研究。针对野外试验场的钻井探测、水力激发、微震监测、循环测试等工程研究以及数值模型模拟研究,对国内、外EGS的研究现状进行了介绍。数值模拟部分着重分析目前几种主要的热储层模型构建,包括规则裂隙网络模型、随机裂隙网络模型、等价多孔介质模型等,并且介绍了本实验室在双能量方程模型方面的研究情况。最后分析和展望了EGS研究的发展趋势,以期为我国EGS研发工作提供参考。
郭剑,陈继良,曹文炅,蒋方明. 增强型地热系统研究综述[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(4): 10-24.
GUO Jian, CHEN Jiliang, CAO Wenjiong, JIANG Fangming. Research Review on Enhanced Geothermal System[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 35(4): 10-24.
[1]国家能源局,财政部,国土资源部,住房和城乡建设部.关于促进地热能开发利用的指导意见[EB/OL] [2013-01-10].http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto87/201302/t20130207_1581.htm.
[2]张建英.增强型地热系统(EGS)资源开发利用研究[J].中国能源,2011,33(1):29-37.
[3]汪集旸,胡圣标,庞忠和,等.中国大陆干热岩地热资源潜力评估[J].科技导报,2012,30(32):25-31.
[4]蔺文静,刘志明,马峰,等.我国陆区干热岩资源潜力估算[J].地球学报,2012,33(5):807-811.
[5]曾克棪,潘小平.中国地热发电开发现状与前景[J].中外能源,2009,14(2):45-48.
[6]毛红举,马洪伟.增强型地热发电技术及广东省应用前景分析[J].能源工程,2010(5):25-28.
[7]彭新明.我国干热岩地热资源钻采工艺浅议[J].探矿工程,2009(S):167-169.
[8]赵阳升,万志军,康建荣.高温岩体地热开发导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:23-69.
[9]李虞庚,蒋其垲,杨伍林.关于高温岩体地热能及其开发利用问题[J].石油科技论坛,2007(1):28-40.
[10]杨吉龙,胡克.干热岩(HDR)资源研究与开发技术综述[J].世界地质,2001,20(1):43-51.
[11]康玲,王时龙,李川.增强地热系统EGS 的人工热储技术[J].机械设计与制造,2008(9):141-143.
[12]Tester J W, Anderson B J, Batchelor A S, et al. The future of geothermal energy: Impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the united states in the 21st century[R]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2006.
[13]Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B. Structure of the low permeable naturally fractured geothermal reservoir at Soultz[J]. Geoscience, 2010, 342(7): 517-530.
[14]Cornet F H, Jones R H. Field evidence on the orientation of forced water flow with respect to the regional principal stress directions[C]//1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium. Texas, USA: Nelson P P, 1994: 61-69.
[15]Brudy M, Zoback M D. Drilling-induced tensile wallfractures: Implications for determination of in-situ stress orientation and magnitude[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Science, 1999, 36(2): 191-215.
[16]Berard T, Cornet F. Evidence of thermally induced borehole elongation: A case study at Soultz, France[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Science, 2003, 40(7-8): 1121-1140.
[17]Valley B, Evans K F. Stress state at Soultz-sous-forets to 5 km depth from wellbore failure and hydraulic observations[C]//32nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2008.
[18]Genter A, Traineau H. Hydrothermally altered and fractured granite in an HDR reservoir in the EPS1 borehole, Alsace, France[C]//17th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 1992.
[19]Genter A, Traineau H. Borehole EPS1(Alsace, France); preliminary geological results from granite core analyses for hot dry rock research[J]. Scientific drilling 1992(3): 205-214.
[20]Genter A, Dezayes C. Fracture evaluation in GPK1 borehole by using FMI data[R]. BRGM Report 1993.
[21]Genter A, Cuenot N, Dezayes C, et al. How a better characterization of a deep crystalline reservoir can contribute to improve EGS performance at Soultz[C]//1st European Geothermal Review. Mainz, Germany: Geothermal Energy for Electric Power Production, 2007: 34-40.
[22]Valley B, Dezayes C, Genter A. Multiscale fracturing in the Soultz-sous-forets basement from borehole image analyses[C]//Proceedings EHDRA Scientific Conference. Soultz-sous-forets, France: EHDRA, 2007: EP6-WP5.
[23]Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B. Structure of the low permeable naturally fractured geothermal reservoir at Soultz[J]. Geoscience,2009,342 (7) :517-530.
[24]Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B. Overview of the fracture network at different scales within the granite reservoir of the egs Soultz site (Alsace, France) [C]//Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. Bali, Indonesia: EHDRA, 2010.
[25]Sausse J, Dezayes C, Genter A. Characterization of fracture connectivity and fluid flow pathways derived from geological interpretation and 3D modelling of the deep seated EGS reservoir of Soultz (France) [C]//33rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2008.
[26]Castera J, Dezayes C, Calcagno P. Large-scale 3D geological model around the Soultz site[C]//Proceedings of the EHDRA scientific conference. Soultz-sous-forets, France: EHDRA, 2008.
[27]Sausse J, Dezayes C, Dorbath L, et al. 3D model of fracture zones at Soultz-sous-forets based on geological data, image logs, induced microseismicity and vertical seismic profiles[J]. Comptes Rendus of Geoscience, 2010, 342(7): 531-545.
[28]Dezayes C, Genter A. Large-scale fracture network based on Soultz borehole data[C]//Proceedings EHDRA Scientific Conference. Soultz-sous-forets, France: EHDRA, 2008.
[29]Dezayes C, Genter A, Gentier S. Fracture network of the EGS Geothermal Reservoir at Soultz-sous-forêts (Rhine Graben, France)[C]//Geothermal Resources Council Transactions. California, USA: Palm Springs, 2004.
[30]Genter A, Castaing C, Dezayes C, et al. Comparative analysis of direct (core) and indirect (borehole imaging tools) collection of fracture data in the hot dry rock Soultz reservoir (France) [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(B7): 15419-15431.
[31]Hooijkaas G R, Genter A, Dezayes C. Deepseated geology of the granite intrusions at the Soultz EGS site based on data from 5 km-deep boreholes[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5-6): 484-506.
[32]Bruel D. Impact of induced thermal stress during circulation tests in an engineered fractured geothermal reservoir[J]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2002(5): 459-470.
[33]Baria R, Michelet S, Baumgartner J, et al. Microseismic monitoring of the world’s largest potential HDR reservoir[C]//29th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2004.
[34]Baumgartner J, Jung R, Gerard A, et al. The European HDR project at Soultz-sous-forets: stimulation of the second deep well and first circulation experiments[C]//21st Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 1996.
[35]Portier S, Andre L, Vuataz F. Review of chemical stimulation techniques in oil industry and applications to geothermal systems[R]. Technical Report, ENGINE work package 4: Drilling, stimulation and reservoir assessment, Neuchatel, Switzerland, 2007.
[36]Nami P, Schellschmidt R, Schindler M, et al. Chemical stimulation operations for reservoir development of the deep crystalline HDR/EGS system at Soultz-sous-forets (France)[C]//33rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2008.
[37]Portier S, Vuataz F, Nami P, et al. Chemical stimulation techniques for geothermal wells: experiments on the 3-well EGS system at Soultz-sous-forets[J]. Geothermics, 2009, 38(4): 349-359.
[38]Jones R H, Stewart R C. A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(B4): 8245-8254.
[39]Pujol J. Joint hypocentral location in media with lateral velocity variations and interpretation of the station corrections[J]. Physics of Earth Planetary Interiors, 1992, 75(1-3): 7-24.
[40]Fehler M C, Phillips W S, House L S, et al. Improved relative locations of clustered earthquakes using constrained multiple event location[R]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2000, 90: 775-780.
[41]Evans K F, Moriya H, Niitsuma H, et al. Microseismicity and permeability enhancement of hydrogeologic structures during massive fluid injections into granite at 3 km depth at the Soultz HDR site[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2005, 160(1): 388-412.
[42]Poupinet G, Ellsworth W L, Frechet J. Monitoring velocity variations in crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras fault[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1984, 89(B7): 5719-5731.
[43]Phillips S, House L S, Fehler M C. Detailed joint structure in a geothermal reservoir from studies of induced microseismic clusters[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(B6): 11745-11763.
[44]Moriya H, Niitsuma H, Baria R. Multiplet-clustering analysis for estimation of fine detail structures in seismic clouds at Soultz field, France[R]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2003, 93: 1606-1620.
[45]Moriya H, Nakazato K, Niitsuma H, et al. Detailed fracture system of the Soultz-sous-forets HDR field evaluated using microseismic multiplet analysis[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2002, 159(1-3): 517-541.
[46]Cuenot N, Dorbath C, Dorbath L. Analysis of the microseismicity induced by fluid injections at the EGS site of Soultz-sous-forets (Alsace, France): Implications for the characterization of the geothermal reservoir properties[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2008, 165(5): 797-828.
[47]Dorbath L, Cuenot N, Genter A, et al. Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-forets (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2009,177(2): 1-23.
[48]Dyer B C. Soultz GPK2 stimulation June/July 2000[R]. Seismic Monitoring Field Report,2000.
[49]Jung R, Willis-Richards J, Nicholls J, et al. Evaluation of hydraulic tests at Soultz-sous-forets, European hot dry rock site[C]//World Geothermal Congress. Florence, Italy: Barbier E, 1995: 2671-2676.
[50]Evans K F, Genter A, Sausse J. Permeability creation and damage due to massive fluid injections into granite at 3.5 km at Soultz, Part 1: Borehole observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110(B4): 1-19.
[51]Evans K F. Permeability creation and damage due to massive fluid injections into granite at 3.5 km at Soultz, Part 2: Critical stress and fracture strength[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110(B4): 1-14.
[52]Evans K F. The effect of the 1993 stimulations of well GPK1 at Soultz on the surrounding rock mass: evidence for the existence of a connected network of permeable fractures[C]//Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress. Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan: Iglesias E, 2000: 3695-3700.
[53]Sanjuan B, Pinault J, Rose P, et al. Tracer testing of the geothermal heat exchanger at Soultz-sous-forêts (France) between 2000 and 2005[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5-6): 622-653.
[54]Blumenthal M, Kühn M, Pape H, et al. Numerical modeling of hydraulic and thermal processes in the deep heat reservoir of the EGS test site Soultz-sous-forêts, France[C]//Proceedings of the Euro-Conference of Rock Physics and Geomechanics on Natural Hazards: Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Processes in Rocks. Erice, Italy: EGU, 2007.
[55] Gentier S, Rachez X, Ngoc T T, et al. 3D flow modeling of the medium-term circulation test performed in the deep geothermal site of Soultz-sous-forets (France)[C]//Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress. Bali, Indonesia: BRGM, 2010.
[56] Kosack C, Vogt C, Rath V, et al. Stochastic estimates of the permeability field of the Soultz-sous-forêts geothermal reservoir-comparison of bayesian inversion, MC geostatistics, and EnKF assimilation[C]//Proceedings of the European Geosciences Union General Assemble. Vienna, Austria: EGU, 2010.
[57] Vogt C, Kosack C, Marquart G. Stochastic inversion of the tracer experiment of the enhanced geothermal system demonstration reservoir in Soultz-sous-forêts:Revealing pathways and estimating permeability distribution[J]. Geothermics, 2012, 42: 1-12.
[58]Radillaa G, Sausse J, Sanjuan B, et al. Interpreting tracer tests in the enhanced geothermal system (EGS) of Soultz-sous-forêts using the equivalent stratified medium approach[J]. Geothermics, 2012, 44: 43-51.
[59] Kohl T, Megel T. Coupled hydro-mechanical modelling of the GPK3 reservoir stimulation at the European EGS site Soultz-sous-forets[C]//30th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2005.
[60] Kohl T, Megel T. Predictive modeling of reservoir response to hydraulic stimulations at the European EGS site Soultz-sous-forets[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(8): 1118-1131.
[61] Taron J, Elsworth D, Min K B. Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(5): 842-854.
[62] Taron J, Elsworth D. Coupled mechanical and chemical processes in engineered geothermal reservoirs with dynamic permeability[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(8): 1339-1348.
[63] Hicks T W, Pines R J, Willis-Richards J, et al. A hydro-thermo-mechanical numerical model for HDR geothermal reservoir evaluation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1996, 33(5): 499-511.
[64] Kolditz O, Clauser C. Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in fractured crystalline rocks: application to the hot dry rock site in Rosemanowes (U.K.) [J]. Geothermics, 1998, 27: 1-23.
[65] DuTeau R, Swenson D V. Modeling flow in a jointed geothermal reservoir[J]. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 1994, 18(6): 465-472.
[66] Long J C S. Investigation of equivalent porous medium permeability in networks of discontinuous fractures[D]. Berkeley, CA:University of California,1983.
[67] Bruel D, Cacas M C. Numerical modelling technique: contribution to the Soultz HDR project[M]. New York:Geothermal Energy in Europe—the Soultz hot dry rock Project, Gordon & Breach,1992: 57-74.
[68] Lanyon G W, Batchelor A S. Modelling for the UK hot dry rock programme using the fracture network method: Summary report[R]. Geoscience Report CC59/R5/078, 1992.
[69] Watanabe K, Takahashi H. A model analysis of the long-term performance of hot dry rock geothermal energy extractions systems[C]//Proceedings of the JSME-ASME International Conference on Power Engineering. Tokyo, Japan: JSME-ASME, 1993: 453-458.
[70] Kolditz O. Modelling flow and heat transfer in fractured rocks: dimensional effect of matrix heat diffusion[J]. Geothermics, 1995, 24: 421-437.
[71] Bruel D. Heat extraction modelling from forced fluid flow through stimulated fractured rock masses: application to the Rosemanowes hot dry rock reservoir[J]. Geothermics, 1995, 24: 361-374.
[72] Shaik A R, Rahman S S, Tran N H, et al. Numerical simulation of fluid-rock coupling heat transfer in naturally fractured geothermal system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(10): 1600-1606.
[73] Yang Y, Yeh H. Modeling heat extraction from hot dry rock in a multi-well system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(8-9): 1676-1681.
[74] Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012, 117(7): 205-228.
[75] Kalinina E, McKenna S, Hadgu T, et al. Analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on heat extraction in an EGS represented with the continuum fracture model[C]//37th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2012.
[76] Jiang F, Luo L, Chen J. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013,41(1):57-62.
[77] Brown D. A hot dry rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO2 instead of water[C]// 25th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University, 2000.
[78] Pruess K. On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as working fluid[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 49(6): 1446-1454.
[79] Fouillac C, Sanjuan B, Gentier S, et al. Could sequestration of CO2 be combined with the development of enhanced geothermal systems? [C] //The third annual conference on carbon capture and sequestration, 2004.
[80] Pruess K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO2 as working fluid-a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of carbon[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35: 351-367. |
[1] | 靳晶新,叶林,吴丹曼,陈小雨,张亚丽,饶日晟. 风能资源评估方法综述[J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(4): 1-. |
[2] | 李永华,刘娟,汤金明. 挡风板纵向间隔悬挂对湿式冷却塔热力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(1): 119-124. |
[3] | 曾利华,张国. 基于多重参考模型的风电场风机尾流模拟[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(8): 135-140. |
[4] | 刘振宇. 覆冰导线空气动力系数数值分析[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(9): 82-87. |
[5] | 黄新波,林淑凡,朱永灿,王玉鑫,宋 桐. 覆冰环境下输电导线外流场数值模拟与分析[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5): 6-12. |
[6] | 周兰欣,王晓斐,王喆,吴瑞康. 空冷岛加装挡风墙的数值模拟[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5): 88-93. |
[7] | 齐阳阳,吴红杰,刘辉. 直接空冷机组单风道地下进风数值分析[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5): 94-98. |
[8] | 吴婷婷,张学镭. 环境风影响下直接空冷机组喷雾增湿系统数值模拟[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(2): 7-12. |
[9] | 魏春枝,陈顺宝. 600 MW机组排汽缸流场特点及其结构优化[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(2): 108-112. |
[10] | 赵文升,肖龙跃,丁晓冬. 发电厂冷却塔弧形布置填料层的特性分析[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(11): 127-131. |
[11] | 周兰欣,王晓斐,吴瑞康. 空冷岛加装挡风网对凝汽器换热效率的影响[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(1): 88-92. |
[12] | 倪煜,李德波. 660 MW超超临界旋流对冲燃煤锅炉二次风配风方式对NOx分布影响的数值模拟[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(1): 109-113. |
[13] | 杨加伦,朱宽军,刘彬,张立春,李军辉. 输电线路冰区分布图绘制关键技术[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34(9): 31-36. |
[14] | 王文平,吴俐俊. 新型板式省煤器的传热特性研究[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34(6): 65-68. |
[15] | 胡颢然,吴俐俊,张历华. 低温地热水有机朗肯循环发电工质的优化[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34(5): 44-48. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2020 《电力建设》编辑部
地址:北京市昌平区北七家未来科技城北区国家电网公司办公区 邮编:102209 电话:010-66602697
京ICP备18017181号-1 国网安备4511A3CPZ号
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发