月刊
ISSN 1000-7229
CN 11-2583/TM
电力建设 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 15-24.doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.02.002
收稿日期:
2022-04-20
出版日期:
2023-02-01
发布日期:
2023-01-30
通讯作者:
张逸(1984),男,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为电能质量、主动配电网及电力数据分析,E-mail:作者简介:
吴逸帆(1998),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为电压暂降,E-mail:wuyifan0513@163.com;基金资助:
ZHANG Yi1(), WU Yifan1(), CHEN Jingteng2()
Received:
2022-04-20
Online:
2023-02-01
Published:
2023-01-30
Supported by:
摘要:
电压暂降已成为最严重的电能质量问题,由于其不可避免,因此风险评估成为减小其影响的关键环节。首先分析了三类电压暂降风险量化指标,将风险评估方法分为基于仿真模拟、基于状态估计以及基于数据驱动三类方法,总结各类方法的优缺点与适用场景;其次,指出在新型电力系统背景下电压暂降风险评估面临的技术挑战;最后,对电压暂降风险评估未来研究方向进行了展望,以期为相关研究开展提供参考思路。
中图分类号:
张逸, 吴逸帆, 陈晶腾. 新型电力系统背景下电压暂降风险评估技术挑战与展望[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(2): 15-24.
ZHANG Yi, WU Yifan, CHEN Jingteng. Research Status of Voltage Sag Risk Assessment and Prospect Under the Background of New Power System[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 44(2): 15-24.
[1] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 电能质量电压暂降与短时中断: GB/T 30137—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014. |
[2] | 王建勋, 张逸, 张嫣, 等. 面向现代工业园区的电压暂降综合防治方案[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(14): 156-163. |
WANG Jianxun, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Yan, et al. Comprehensive prevention and control scheme for voltage sag in modern industrial park[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(14): 156-163. | |
[3] | 张逸, 李为明, 林芳, 等. 基于电气特性-物理属性的工业用户电压暂降缓减策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(2): 632-642. |
ZHANG Yi, LI Weiming, LIN Fang, et al. Voltage sag mitigation strategy for industrial users based on process electrical characteristics-physical attribute[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(2): 632-642. | |
[4] | 徐悦, 孙建军, 丁凯, 等. 基于场景构建的电压暂降特征量随机评估方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(9): 105-112. |
XU Yue, SUN Jianjun, DING Kai, et al. Random evaluation method of voltage sag characteristics based on scenario construction[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(9): 105-112. | |
[5] | 刘勃江, 李华强, 肖先勇, 等. 敏感设备电压暂降故障水平的风险评估[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2016, 28(3): 87-92. |
LIU Bojiang, LI Huaqiang, XIAO Xianyong, et al. Risk assessment for failure level of sensitive equipment caused by voltage sag[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2016, 28(3): 87-92. | |
[6] |
GOSWAMI A K, GUPTA C P, SINGH G K. Voltage sag assessment in a large chemical industry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2012, 48(5): 1739-1746.
doi: 10.1109/TIA.2012.2209854 URL |
[7] | 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 电压暂降指标与严重程度评估方法: GB/T 39270—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. |
[8] | IEC. Electromagnetic compatibility(EMC): part 2-8: environment voltage dips and short interruptions on public electric power supply systems with statistical measurement results: IEC61000-2-8[S]. Geneva,Switzerland: IEC, 2002. |
[9] |
DE SANTIS M, STASIO L D, NOCE C, et al. Indices of intermittence to improve the forecasting of the voltage sags measured in real systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2022, 37(2): 1252-1263.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2021.3082280 URL |
[10] | 徐培栋, 肖先勇, 汪颖. 考虑母线电压时变区间特性的电压暂降频次评估[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2011, 31(10): 66-72. |
XU Peidong, XIAO Xianyong, WANG Ying. Voltage sags frequency evaluation considering the time-varying interval characteristics of bus voltage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(10): 66-72. | |
[11] | 叶曦, 刘开培, 李志伟. 不确定条件下计及线路保护动作特性的电压暂降频次评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(3): 169-176. |
YE Xi, LIU Kaipei, LI Zhiwei. Voltage sag frequency assessment considering action characteristics of line protection in uncertain conditions[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(3): 169-176. | |
[12] | IEEE Power and Energy Society. IEEE guide for voltage sag indices: IEEE Std 1564-2014[S]. New York, USA: IEEE Standard Association, 2014. |
[13] | 吴国沛, 许中, 何淇彰, 等. 计及负载随机性的设备电压暂降停机概率评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(8): 174-179. |
WU Guopei, XU Zhong, HE Qizhang, et al. Evaluation of equipment malfunction probability considering load randomness[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(8): 174-179. | |
[14] | 贾清泉, 艾丽, 董海艳, 等. 考虑不确定性的电压暂降不兼容度和影响度评价指标及方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(1): 48-57. |
JIA Qingquan, AI Li, DONG Haiyan, et al. Uncertainty description and assessment of incompatibility & influence index for voltage sags[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(1): 48-57. | |
[15] | 李天楚, 伍智鹏, 方铭, 等. 基于Larsen推理的电压暂降下工业过程负荷损失率评估方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(4): 145-153. |
LI Tianchu, WU Zhipeng, FANG Ming, et al. Load loss rate evaluation method of an industrial process under voltage sag based on Larsen reasoning[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(4): 145-153. | |
[16] | 吴国诚, 叶樊, 梁帅伟, 等. 基于电压持续曲线的多次电压暂降严重程度评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(2): 182-191, 200. |
WU Guocheng, YE Fan, LIANG Shuaiwei, et al. Evaluation method of multiple voltage sag severity based on voltage duration curves[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(2): 182-191, 200. | |
[17] | 胡文曦, 肖先勇, 李成鑫. 考虑多维特征刻画的电压暂降严重程度评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(1): 331-338. |
HU Wenxi, XIAO Xianyong, LI Chengxin. Voltage sag severity assessment method considering multi-dimension characterization[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(1): 331-338. | |
[18] | CIGRE/CIRED/UIE Joint Working Group C4.110. Voltage dip immunity of equipment and installations[R]. Paris, France: CIGRE, 2010. |
[19] | 李春海, 李华强, 刘勃江. 基于过程免疫不确定性的工业用户电压暂降经济损失风险评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2016, 36(12): 136-142. |
LI Chunhai, LI Huaqiang, LIU Bojiang. Risk assessment based on process immunity uncertainty for industrial customers’ financial losses due to voltage sags[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2016, 36(12): 136-142. | |
[20] | 张逸, 李为明, 张嫣, 等. 考虑供电系统运行方式的工业过程电压暂降耐受特性评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2019, 39(12): 205-211. |
ZHANG Yi, LI Weiming, ZHANG Yan, et al. Evaluation method for voltage sag tolerance characteristics of industrial process considering operation mode of power supply system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39(12): 205-211. | |
[21] |
CEBRIAN J C, KAGAN N, MILANOVIJ V. Probabilistic estimation of distribution network performance with respect to voltage sags and interruptions considering network protection setting: part I: the methodology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2018, 33(1): 42-51.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2633518 URL |
[22] | 雷刚, 顾伟, 袁晓冬. 考虑系统与敏感负荷兼容性的电压暂降指标[J]. 电工技术学报, 2010, 25(12): 132-138. |
LEI Gang, GU Wei, YUAN Xiaodong. A voltage sag index considering compatibility between system and sensitive equipment[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2010, 25(12): 132-138. | |
[23] | 周翔, 王丰华, 黄荣辉, 等. 考虑系统与敏感设备的变电站电压暂降综合评估[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(8): 1940-1946. |
ZHOU Xiang, WANG Fenghua, HUANG Ronghui, et al. Assessment of voltage sags in substations based on power system and equipment sensitivity analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(8): 1940-1946. | |
[24] | 吴奇珂, 陈昕儒, 吴少臣, 等. 基于蒙特卡洛的电网节点电压暂降风险分析[J]. 电气应用, 2017, 36(3): 51-59. |
[25] | 曾江, 蔡东阳. 基于组合权重的蒙特卡洛电压暂降评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(5): 1469-1475. |
ZENG Jiang, CAI Dongyang. A Monte Carlo assessment method of voltage sags based on combination weight[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(5): 1469-1475. | |
[26] |
吕金炳, 韦鹏飞, 刘亚丽, 等. 考虑新能源出力相关性的电网电压暂降随机预估[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(10): 71-81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2018.10.009 |
LÜ Jinbing, WEI Pengfei, LIU Yali, et al. Stochastic estimation of voltage sag considering output correlation of renewable energy sources[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2018, 39(10): 71-81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2018.10.009 |
|
[27] | 代双寅, 韩民晓, 严稳莉. 含分布式电源的配电网电压暂降评估[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(7): 145-149. |
DAI Shuangyin, HAN Minxiao, YAN Wenli. Voltage sag assessment for distribution network containing distributed generation[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(7): 145-149. | |
[28] | 王建勋, 张逸, 陈晶腾, 等. 省级电网电压暂降评估与工业用户潜在供电点优选[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(8): 201-207, 224. |
WANG Jianxun, ZHANG Yi, CHEN Jingteng, et al. Evaluation of provincial power grid voltage sag and optimal selection of potential power supply points for industrial users[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(8): 201-207, 224. | |
[29] |
WANG B, XU W, PAN Z C. Voltage sag state estimation for power distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(2): 806-812.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846174 URL |
[30] | 王宾, 潘贞存, 徐文远. 配电系统电压跌落幅值估算分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(13): 29-34. |
WANG Bin, PAN Zhencun, XU Wenyuan. Voltage sags profile estimation for power distribution systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(13): 29-34. | |
[31] |
ZAMBRANO X, HERNÁNDEZ A, IZZEDDINE M, et al. Estimation of voltage sags from a limited set of monitors in power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2017, 32(2): 656-665.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2594232 URL |
[32] | 王宾, 潘贞存, 董新洲. 基于电压跌落状态估计的复杂配电网络故障路径搜索算法[J]. 电网技术, 2007, 31(10): 55-60. |
WANG Bin, PAN Zhencun, DONG Xinzhou. A fault path searching algorithm based on voltage sag state estimation for complicated distribution systems[J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(10): 55-60. | |
[33] | ESPINOSA-JUAREZ E, ESPINOZA-TINOCO J R, HERNANDEZ A. Neural networks applied to solve the voltage sag state estimation problem: An approach based on the fault positions concept[C]// 2009 Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA). Cuernavaca, Mexico: IEEE, 2009: 88-93. |
[34] |
LUCIO J, ESPINOSA-JUÁREZ E, HERNÁNDEZ A. Voltage sag state estimation in power systems by applying genetic algorithms[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2011, 5(2): 223.
doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0148 URL |
[35] |
HERNANDEZ A, ESPINOSA-JUAREZ E, DE CASTRO R M, et al. SVD applied to voltage sag state estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2013, 28(2): 866-874.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2218627 URL |
[36] | 唐琳, 肖先勇, 张逸, 等. 电压暂降状态和水平评估模式匹配法与监测装置多目标优化配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(13): 3264-3271. |
TANG Lin, XIAO Xianyong, ZHANG Yi, et al. Voltage sag state and level assessment based on pattern matching method and multi-objective optimal monitors allocation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(13): 3264-3271. | |
[37] | 张国辉, 王宾, 潘贞存, 等. 配电系统电压跌落状态估计中的不良数据辨识[J]. 电网技术, 2010, 34(8): 69-73. |
ZHANG Guohui, WANG Bin, PAN Zhencun, et al. Bad data identification in voltage sag state estimation of distribution system[J]. Power System Technology, 2010, 34(8): 69-73. | |
[38] | 司学振, 李琼林, 杨家莉, 等. 基于实测数据的电压暂降特性分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2017, 37(12): 144-149. |
SI Xuezhen, LI Qionglin, YANG Jiali, et al. Analysis of voltage sag characteristics based on measured data[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017, 37(12): 144-149. | |
[39] | 浦雨婷, 杨洪耕, 马晓阳. 基于数据挖掘与改进灰靶的电压暂降严重度分析与评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(2): 198-206. |
PU Yuting, YANG Honggeng, MA Xiaoyang. Analysis and evaluation of voltage sag severity based on data mining and improved grey target theory[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(2): 198-206. | |
[40] |
田世明, 卜凡鹏, 齐林海, 等. 电压暂降事件的频繁模式挖掘与知识推理分析[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(5): 21-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2018.05.003 |
TIAN Shiming, BU Fanpeng, QI Linhai, et al. Frequent pattern mining and knowledge reasoning of voltage sag events[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2018, 39(5): 21-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2018.05.003 |
|
[41] | 王璐, 肖先勇, 汪颖, 等. 基于深度神经网络的电压暂降经济损失评估模型[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(6): 156-165. |
WANG Lu, XIAO Xianyong, WANG Ying, et al. DNN-based estimation model of economic loss caused by voltage sag[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(6): 156-165. | |
[42] |
XIAO F, AI Q. Data-driven multi-hidden Markov model-based power quality disturbance prediction that incorporates weather conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(1): 402-412.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2856743 URL |
[43] |
WANG Y, et al. Data-driven prediction method for characteristics of voltage sag based on fuzzy time series[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 134: 107394.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107394 URL |
[44] | 刘旭娜, 肖先勇, 刘阳, 等. 工业过程电压暂降风险等级层次化多级模糊综合评估[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(7): 1984-1988. |
LIU Xuna, XIAO Xianyong, LIU Yang, et al. Hierarchical multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on risk level of voltage sag during industrial process[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(7): 1984-1988. | |
[45] | 何函洋, 肖先勇, 李成鑫, 等. 敏感用户电压暂降损失风险评估的模糊推理模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(20): 6527-6536. |
HE Hanyang, XIAO Xianyong, LI Chengxin, et al. Fuzzy reasoning model for risk assessment of voltage sag loss for sensitive users[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(20): 6527-6536. | |
[46] | 周孝信, 陈树勇, 鲁宗相, 等. 能源转型中我国新一代电力系统的技术特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(7): 1893-1904, 2205. |
ZHOU Xiaoxin, CHEN Shuyong, LU Zongxiang, et al. Technology features of the new generation power system in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(7): 1893-1904, 2205. | |
[47] | 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 风电场接入电力系统技术规定第1部分:陆上风电: GB/T 19963.1—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021. |
Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for connecting wind farm to power system—Part 1: On shore wind power: GB/T 19963.1—2021[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021. | |
[48] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 光伏发电站接入电力系统技术规定: GB/T 19964—2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013. |
[49] | 于琳, 孙华东, 徐式蕴, 等. 电力电子设备接入电压支撑强度量化评估指标综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(2): 499-515. |
YU Lin, SUN Huadong, XU Shiyun, et al. Overview of strength quantification indexes of power system with power electronic equipment[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(2): 499-515. | |
[50] | 贾东梨, 刘科研, 盛万兴, 等. 有源配电网故障场景下的电压暂降仿真与评估方法研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(5): 1279-1288. |
JIA Dongli, LIU Keyan, SHENG Wanxing, et al. Voltage sag simulation and evaluation in active distribution network with fault cases[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(5): 1279-1288. | |
[51] | 季玉琦, 潘超, 肖晗, 等. 分布式电源电压支撑能力层次分析评价[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(11): 163-171. |
JI Yuqi, PAN Chao, XIAO Han, et al. Hierarchical analysis and evaluation of the voltage support capability of distributed generation[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(11): 163-171. | |
[52] | 谢小荣, 贺静波, 毛航银, 等. “双高”电力系统稳定性的新问题及分类探讨[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(2): 461-475. |
XIE Xiaorong, HE Jingbo, MAO Hangyin, et al. New issues and classification of power system stability with high shares of renewables and power electronics[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(2): 461-475. | |
[53] | 王伟亮, 王丹, 贾宏杰, 等. 能源互联网背景下的典型区域综合能源系统稳态分析研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(12): 3292-3306. |
WANG Weiliang, WANG Dan, JIA Hongjie, et al. Review of steady-state analysis of typical regional integrated energy system under the background of energy Internet[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(12): 3292-3306. | |
[54] | 余晓丹, 徐宪东, 陈硕翼, 等. 综合能源系统与能源互联网简述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31(1): 1-13. |
YU Xiaodan, XU Xiandong, CHEN Shuoyi, et al. A brief review to integrated energy system and energy internet[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(1): 1-13. | |
[55] | 苏洁莹, 邓丰强, 张勇军. 考虑相依特性的电-气互联网络故障评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(11): 32-39. |
SU Jieying, DENG Fengqiang, ZHANG Yongjun. Failure assessment method of integrated electricity and natural gas network considering interdependent characteristics[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(11): 32-39. | |
[56] | 严超, 别朝红, 王灿, 等. 面向新一代能源系统的风险评估研究现状及展望[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(1): 12-22. |
YAN Chao, BIE Zhaohong, WANG Can, et al. Risk assessment studies for new generation energy system[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(1): 12-22. | |
[57] | 田芳, 黄彦浩, 史东宇, 等. 电力系统仿真分析技术的发展趋势[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(13): 2151-2163. |
TIAN Fang, HUANG Yanhao, SHI Dongyu, et al. Developing trend of power system simulation and analysis technology[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(13): 2151-2163. | |
[58] | 高元海, 王淳, 辛建波, 等. 计及接地阻抗及含多种分布式电源的中低压配电网三相潮流计算(一): 模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(10): 2619-2627. |
GAO Yuanhai, WANG Chun, XIN Jianbo, et al. Three-phase power flow calculation of medium-low voltage distribution network considering grounding impedance and containing various distributed generators, part Ⅰ: models[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(10): 2619-2627. | |
[59] | 汪勋婷. 基于相互依存网络的综合能源系统脆弱性评估方法研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2018. |
WANG Xunting. Study on interdependent network vulnerability assessment for integrated energy system[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2018. | |
[60] | 沈沉, 曹仟妮, 贾孟硕, 等. 电力系统数字孪生的概念、特点及应用展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(2): 487-499. |
SHEN Chen, CAO Qianni, JIA Mengshuo, et al. Concepts, characteristics and prospects of application of digital twin in power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(2): 487-499. |
[1] | 樊伟, 李旭东, 王尧, 李祥光, 王玉洁, 谭忠富, 鞠立伟. 新型电力系统灵活性资源聚合两阶段调度优化模型[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(2): 25-37. |
[2] | 苏鹏, 陈璐, 吴坚, 刘鑫, 马继涛. 新型电力系统多能源能量惯性动态优化控制模型[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(9): 87-93. |
[3] | 范辉, 罗蓬, 王弘利, 梁纪峰, 李乾, 杨军, 吴赋章. 基于社交网上演化博弈的光伏台区用户需求响应特性研究[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(8): 150-158. |
[4] | 赵晶晶, 张宇, 杜明, 朱炯达, 许宏源. 基于模型预测控制的新型电力系统光储电站调频控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(11): 99-107. |
[5] | 孟珺遐, 蒋利民, 谢佳妮, 汪颖. 考虑用户投资意愿的电压暂降治理设备优化配置[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(8): 55-62. |
[6] | 刘凯奇, 李华强, 陆杨, 李旭翔. 基于安全性风险评估与保险机制的可用输电能力决策[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(8): 118-126. |
[7] | 李佳玮, 吴克河, 张波. 一种基于小生境遗传算法的电网信息安全风险评估模型[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(3): 89-96. |
[8] | 方金涛,龚庆武. 考虑运行风险的主动配电网分布式电源多目标优化配置[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(5): 128-. |
[9] | 靳文涛,牛萌,吕洪章,李建林. 客户侧分布式储能汇聚潜力评估方法[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(4): 34-41. |
[10] | 徐铭铭,姚森,牛荣泽,胡博,徐恒博,谢开贵,周宁,郝钰. 配电网重复多发性停电风险辨识方法[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(8): 111-115. |
[11] | 田世明,卜凡鹏,齐林海,罗燕. 电压暂降事件的频繁模式挖掘与知识推理分析 [J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(5): 21-. |
[12] | 徐悦洋1,赵荔2,魏应冬2,谢磊1,余加喜1,陈雁3, 张东辉3,胡剑琛1,魏国清1,姜齐荣2 . 并联型统一电能质量控制装置无缝切换控制技术 [J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(2): 68-. |
[13] | 任志超,程超,何仲潇,汪晓华,王枭. 基于电热耦合潮流的综合能源系统风险评估方法[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(12): 102-108. |
[14] | 吕金炳,韦鹏飞,刘亚丽,王旭东,李树鹏,徐永海. 考虑新能源出力相关性的电网电压暂降随机预估[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(10): 71-81. |
[15] | 邵冰冰, 韩民晓,郭抒颖,孟昭君. 多端柔性直流输电系统交流侧故障穿越功率协调控制[J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(8): 109-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2020 《电力建设》编辑部
地址:北京市昌平区北七家未来科技城北区国家电网公司办公区 邮编:102209 电话:010-66602697
京ICP备18017181号-1 国网安备4511A3CPZ号
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发