动态履约保函额度下售电公司中长期交易模型

doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2024.02.014

电力建设 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 160-170.doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2024.02.014

动态履约保函额度下售电公司中长期交易模型

吴静斌¹^,²(), 杨洪明¹^,²(), 盛谊³(), 项胜²(), 孟科²()

1.长沙理工大学经济与管理学院,长沙市 410114
2.教育部“基于分布式光储的能源互联网运行与规划”国际合作联合实验室(长沙理工大学电气与信息工程学院),长沙市 410114
3.国网经济技术研究院有限公司,北京市 102209

收稿日期:2023-07-25 出版日期:2024-02-01 发布日期:2024-01-28
通讯作者: 吴静斌(1976),男,博士研究生,中级经济师,主要研究方向为电力市场,E-mail:284264492@qq.com。
作者简介:杨洪明(1972),女,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,主要研究方向为电力市场,E-mail:yhm5218@163.com;
盛谊(1974),女,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为电力工程咨询,E-mail:37879003@qq.com;
项胜(1989),男,博士,讲师,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向为分布式能源系统,电力市场,E-mail:sxiang@csust.edu.cn;
孟科(1982),男,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向为电力系统运行与管理,智能电网,E-mail:funnyjason@gmail.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72061147004);国家自然科学基金资助项目(72201041);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71871031);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2023JJ40046);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(21B0334);教育部“春晖计划”资助项目(202202173)

Medium and Long-Term Transaction Model for Power Selling Companies Considering Dynamic Adjustment of Performance Guarantee Quota

WU Jingbin¹^,²(), YANG Hongming¹^,²(), SHENG Yi³(), XIANG Sheng²(), MENG Ke²()

1. Economics and Management College of Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
2. International Joint Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Operation and Planning of Energy Internet based on Distributed Photovoltaic-Storage Energy(Electrical and Information Engineering College of Changsha University of Science and Technology), Changsha 410114, China
3. State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China

Received:2023-07-25 Published:2024-02-01 Online:2024-01-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(72061147004);National Natural Science Foundation of China(72201041);National Natural Science Foundation of China(71871031);Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China(2023JJ40046);Young Talent Project of the Provincial Education Department of Hunan(21B0334);Chunhui Plan Project from the Ministry of Education(202202173)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

现行人为主观给定的固定履约保函额度模式导致售电公司履约保函成本测算缺乏客观性,影响交易决策。为此,提出了一种基于动态履约保函额度的售电公司中长期交易优化决策模型。首先,提出考虑售电公司信用透支程度、市场流失程度和国家政策倾向的额度调整系数,并构建动态履约保函额度模型。其次,考虑履约保函成本变化对售电公司交易决策及利润的影响,以售电公司利润最大化为目标,构建了计及履约保函额度动态调整的中长期交易优化决策模型。最后,通过分析多个场景下售电公司参与中长期交易的动态和固定履约保函额度、履约保函成本和交易利润,验证了所提出的基于动态履约保函额度的售电公司中长期交易优化决策模型的合理性和有效性。

关键词: 售电公司, 动态履约保函额度, 额度调整系数, 中长期交易优化决策

Abstract:

The current subjectively fixed performance guarantee quota model lacks objectivity in the cost calculation of performance guarantees for power-selling companies, which affects transaction decisions. Therefore, this study proposes a medium- and long-term transaction optimization decision-making model for power-selling companies based on a dynamic performance guarantee quota. First, a quota adjustment coefficient was proposed, considering the credit overdraft level, market loss level, and national policy inclination of the power-selling company. Subsequently, a dynamic performance guarantee quota model was constructed. Second, to maximize the profits of power-selling companies, a medium- and long-term trading optimization decision-making model was constructed, considering the impact of changes in the cost of performance guarantee on the trading decisions. This model incorporates the dynamic adjustment of the performance guarantee quota. Finally, by analyzing the dynamic and fixed performance guarantee quota, performance guarantee costs, and transaction profits of power-selling companies participating in medium- and long-term transactions under multiple scenarios, the suitability and effectiveness of the proposed optimization decision model for the medium- and long-term transactions of power-selling companies based on the dynamic performance guarantee quota were verified.

Key words: power selling company, dynamic performance guarantee quota, quota adjustment coefficient, medium- and long-term transaction optimization decision-making

中图分类号:

TM73

吴静斌, 杨洪明, 盛谊, 项胜, 孟科. 动态履约保函额度下售电公司中长期交易模型[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(2): 160-170.

WU Jingbin, YANG Hongming, SHENG Yi, XIANG Sheng, MENG Ke. Medium and Long-Term Transaction Model for Power Selling Companies Considering Dynamic Adjustment of Performance Guarantee Quota[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 45(2): 160-170.

图/表 11

表1 固定、动态履约保函额度的区别

Table 1 Difference between fixed and dynamically adjusted performance guarantee quota

图1 额度动态调整的售电公司月度履约保函金额缴交流程

Fig.1 Dynamic adjustment quota-based performance guarantee monthly amount payment process for power selling company

图2 售电公司交易结果的BFO-PSO混合算法求解流程

Fig.2 BFO-PSO hybrid algorithm solving process for transaction results of power selling companies

表2 额度调整系数评价因素的基础数据设置

Table 2 Basic data settings of quota adjustment coefficient evaluation factors

表3 各评价因素权重

Table 3 Weight of each evaluation factor

表4 额度调整系数各评价因素取值区间

Table 4 Value range of various evaluation factors for quota adjustment coefficient

图3 动态设计前后额度调整系数与售电公司实际支付、理论履约保函额度关系

Fig.3 Relationship between the quota adjustment coefficient and the actual payment and theoretical performance guarantee quota of power selling company before and after dynamic design

表5 售电公司履约保函额度参数设置

Table 5 Parameter settings for performance guarantee quota of power selling companies

图4 售电公司月度交易电价优化决策结果

Fig.4 Optimization decision result of monthly transaction price of power selling company

图5 售电公司月度交易电量优化决策结果

Fig.5 Optimization decision result of monthly transaction quantity of power selling company

表6 调整前后售电公司月度履约保函额度、成本及交易利润

Table 6 Monthly performance guarantee quota, cost and transaction profit of power selling company before and after adjustment

参考文献 43

[1]	赵晨曦, 过涵. 国际工程中履约保证理论释义及应用辨析[J]. 工程经济, 2021, 31(11): 60-65.
	ZHAO Chenxi, GUO Han. Theory interpretation and application analysis of performance security in international engineering[J]. Engineering Economy, 2021, 31(11): 60-65.
[2]	SHEN Y, BAO Z F, QIN X L, et al. Adaptive task scheduling strategy in cloud: when energy consumption meets performance guarantee[J]. World Wide Web, 2017, 20(2): 155-173. doi: 10.1007/s11280-016-0382-4 URL
[3]	CHANG L H, WU J Y. An improved RIP-based performance guarantee for sparse signal recovery via orthogonal matching pursuit[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2014, 60(9): 5702-5715. doi: 10.1109/TIT.18 URL
[4]	TAO X Y, OTA K, DONG M X, et al. Performance guaranteed computation offloading for mobile-edge cloud computing[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2017, 6(6): 774-777. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2017.2740927 URL
[5]	PAN X J, LI S D. Dynamic optimal control of process-product innovation with learning by doing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(1): 136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.007 URL
[6]	崔东君, 和敬涵, 程晓春, 等. 考虑可再生能源配额分配的电力零售市场设计[J]. 四川电力技术, 2021, 44(1): 70-76.
	CUI Dongjun, HE Jinghan, CHENG Xiaochun, et al. Design of electricity retail market considering quota allocation of renewable energy[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2021, 44(1): 70-76.
[7]	林新, 徐宏, 朱策, 等. 电力市场合规管理建设探究[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(1): 28-38.
	LIN Xin, XU Hong, ZHU Ce, et al. Construction of compliance management in electricity market[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(1): 28-38.
[8]	曹昉, 罗进奔, 丁国华, 等. 面向电力市场环境的售电公司退出机制设计及退出险模型[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(12): 4729-4741.
	CAO Fang, LUO Jinben, DING Guohua, et al. Exit mechanism design and exit insurance model of electricity retailers facing electricity market[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(12): 4729-4741.
[9]	江昕玥, 侯佳萱, 吴华华, 等. 澳大利亚电力监管机制及其对中国的启示[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(14): 1-12.
	JIANG Xinyue, HOU Jiaxuan, WU Huahua, et al. Electricity regulatory mechanisms in Australia and its enlightenment to China[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(14): 1-12.
[10]	刘连光, 潘明明, 田世明, 等. 考虑源网荷多元主体的售电竞争非合作博弈方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(6): 1618-1626.
	LIU Lianguang, PAN Mingming, TIAN Shiming, et al. A non-cooperative game analysis of an competitive electricity retail considering multiple subjects of source-grid-load[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(6): 1618-1626.
[11]	ZHANG Z, JIANG Y C, LIN Z Z, et al. Optimal alliance strategies among retailers under energy deviation settlement mechanism in China’s forward electricity market[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(3): 2059-2071. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.59 URL
[12]	CUI Q, WANG X L, WANG X F, et al. Residential appliances direct load control in real-time using cooperative game[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 31(1): 226-233. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2391774 URL
[13]	SIRIN S M, GONUL M S. Behavioral aspects of regulation: a discussion on switching and demand response in Turkish electricity market[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 97: 591-602. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.005 URL
[14]	唐学军, 韩佶, 苗世洪, 等. 基于需求侧响应的多类型负荷协调控制模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(16): 116-123.
	TANG Xuejun, HAN Ji, MIAO Shihong, et al. Coordinated control model of multi-type load based on demand response[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(16): 116-123.
[15]	程志友, 汪德胜. 基于机器学习与疫情关联特征的短期负荷预测[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(23): 1-8.
	CHENG Zhiyou, WANG Desheng. Short-term load forecasting based on machine learning and epidemic association features[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(23): 1-8.
[16]	黄冬梅, 陈欢, 王宁, 等. 基于自适应图注意力网络的短期用户负荷预测[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2023, 51(20): 140-149.
	HUANG Dongmei, CHEN Huan, WANG Ning, et al. Short-term user load prediction based on an adaptive graph attention network[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2023, 51(20): 140-149.
[17]	郭曼兰, 陈皓勇, 肖文平, 等. 计及浮动高峰电价的购售双方优化模型[J]. 南方电网技术, 2021, 15(5): 79-88.
	GUO Manlan, CHEN Haoyong, XIAO Wenping, et al. Optimization model for both purchase and sale considering variable peak price[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2021, 15(5): 79-88.
[18]	FANG X, HU Q R, LI F X, et al. Coupon-based demand response considering wind power uncertainty: a strategic bidding model for load serving entities[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(2): 1025-1037. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2431271 URL
[19]	YANG J J, ZHAO J H, WEN F S, et al. A model of customizing electricity retail prices based on load profile clustering analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(3): 3374-3386. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411 URL
[20]	CHAI B, CHEN J M, YANG Z Y, et al. Demand response management with multiple utility companies: a two-level game approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 5(2): 722-731. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2295024 URL
[21]	GOOD N. Using behavioural economic theory in modelling of demand response[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 239: 107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.158
[22]	WANG J, ZHOU M C, GUO X W, et al. Multiperiod asset allocation considering dynamic loss aversion behavior of investors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2019, 6(1): 73-81. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.6570650 URL
[23]	张智, 卢峰, 林振智, 等. 考虑用户有限理性的售电公司峰谷组合电力套餐设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(16): 114-123.
	ZHANG Zhi, LU Feng, LIN Zhenzhi, et al. Peak-valley combination electricity package design for electricity retailer considering bounded rationality of consumers[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(16): 114-123.
[24]	赵璇, 蒋传文, 王旭, 等. 计及售电公司风险偏好和用户需求响应的售电公司购售电决策方法[J]. 电气自动化, 2019, 41(3): 85-87, 102.
	ZHAO Xuan, JIANG Chuanwen, WANG Xu, et al. Decision-making method for power purchasing and selling of the power purchasing company considering its risk preference and user’s demand response[J]. Electrical Automation, 2019, 41(3): 85-87, 102.
[25]	LIU J Q, GAO W, LI D, et al. An incentive mechanism combined with anchoring effect and loss aversion to stimulate data offloading in IoT[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6(3): 4491-4511. doi: 10.1109/JIoT.6488907 URL
[26]	戴尚文, 张利, 刘宁宁, 等. 考虑可再生能源消纳责任的售电公司购电决策分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 156-164.
	DAI Shangwen, ZHANG Li, LIU Ningning, et al. Energy purchasing strategy of electricity retailer considering the responsibility of renewable energy consumption[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(9): 156-164.
[27]	WEI W, LIU F, MEI S W. Energy pricing and dispatch for smart grid retailers under demand response and market price uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 6(3): 1364-1374. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2376522 URL
[28]	YANG H M, ZHANG J, QIU J, et al. A practical pricing approach to smart grid demand response based on load classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(1): 179-190. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2547883 URL
[29]	贾晨, 杜欣慧, 姚宏民. 计及不确定因素的售电公司动态购电决策多目标优化研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2019, 47(21): 134-143.
	JIA Chen, DU Xinhui, YAO Hongmin. Multi-objective optimization research on dynamic procurement strategy for electricity retailers considering uncertainty factors[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47(21): 134-143.
[30]	DOWNWARD A, YOUNG D, ZAKERI G. Electricity retail contracting under risk-aversion[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 251(3): 846-859. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.040 URL
[31]	杨洪明, 吴静斌. 基于可动态调整风险偏好因子的发/售电一体型集团公司中长期交易合作博弈决策[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(5): 16-27.
	YANG Hongming, WU Jingbin. Medium and long-term trading cooperation game decision of power generating & trading integrated company based on dynamically adjusted risk aversion factor[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(5): 16-27.
[32]	吴玲, 刘浩, 刘秋华, 等. 可再生能源配额制下售电公司多市场交易决策[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(7): 1-10. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.07.001
	WU Ling, LIU Hao, LIU Qiuhua, et al. Research on the multi-market decisions of electricity retailers under renewable portfolio standards[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(7): 1-10. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.07.001
[33]	汪元芹, 刘敏. 考虑现货电价及分布式电源不确定性的售电商购售电决策模型[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2021, 37(11): 62-71.
	WANG Yuanqin, LIU Min. Electricity purchase and sale decision modelling for electricity retailers considering the uncertainty of spot electricity price and distributed power generation[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2021, 37(11): 62-71.
[34]	王进猛, 吴小强. 税率调整对外资企业跨国关联交易的影响研究: 基于2008年企业所得税改革的准自然实验分析[J]. 国际税收, 2023(1): 63-74.
	WANG Jinmeng, WU Xiaoqiang. A research on the impacts of tax rate adjustment on cross-border related-party transactions of foreign-funded enterprises: a quasi-natural experimental study based on the 2008 enterprise income tax reform[J]. International Taxation in China, 2023(1): 63-74.
[35]	裘华东, 段光, 牛东晓. 基于ICWME的电网售电公司运营效益评价[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2019(4): 17-22.
	QIU Huadong, DUAN Guang, NIU Dongxiao. Evaluation for operating efficiency of electricity-retailing companies of power gri based on ICWME[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2019(4): 17-22.
[36]	赵宾华, 黄金华, 李占斌, 等. 基于AHP-熵值法组合赋权的甘肃省城市生态用水安全综合评价及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(1): 167-173, 213.
	ZHAO Binhua, HUANG Jinhua, LI Zhanbin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and influencing factor analysis of urban ecological water security in Gansu province based on AHP-entropy method[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 167-173, 213.
[37]	代革联, 高幸, 姬中奎, 等. 组合赋权法在含水层富水性评价中的应用[J]. 煤炭技术, 2022, 41(11): 82-86.
	DAI Gelian, GAO Xing, JI Zhongkui, et al. Application of combined weighting method in evaluation of water richness of aquifer[J]. Coal Technology, 2022, 41(11): 82-86.
[38]	REIG-MULLOR J, PLA-SANTAMARIA D, GARCIA-BERNABEU A. Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (E-FAHP): a general approach[J]. Mathematics, 2020, 8(11): 2014. doi: 10.3390/math8112014 URL
[39]	崔杨, 修志坚, 刘闯, 等. 计及需求响应与火-储深度调峰定价策略的电力系统双层优化调度[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(13): 4403-4415.
	CUI Yang, XIU Zhijian, LIU Chuang, et al. Dual level optimal dispatch of power system considering demand response and pricing strategy on deep peak regulation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(13): 4403-4415.
[40]	覃源, 吕杲, 关科, 等. 基于熵权法的混凝土耐久性评价及寿命预测[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2023, 51(5): 1344-1354.
	QIN Yuan, LV Gao, GUAN Ke, et al. Durability assessment and life prediction of concrete by entropy weight method[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 51(5): 1344-1354.
[41]	梁冠军, 尤超, 张勇, 等. 基于FAHP的既有房屋改建施工安全风险评估模型及应用[J]. 西昌学院学报(自然科学版), 2023, 37(2): 28-33.
	LIANG Guanjun, YOU Chao, ZHANG Yong, et al. Risk assessment model and its application on existing building reconstruction based on FAHP[J]. Journal of Xichang University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 37(2): 28-33.
[42]	曾博, 白婧萌, 郭万祝, 等. 智能配电网需求响应效益综合评价[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(5): 1603-1612.
	ZENG Bo, BAI Jingmeng, GUO Wanzhu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation for benefits of demand response in smart distribution networks[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(5): 1603-1612.
[43]	贾晨, 杜欣慧. 中长期交易机制下售电公司购电策略优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 140-147.
	JIA Chen, DU Xinhui. Optimization of electricity purchasing strategy for electricity retailers under the medium and long-term trading mechanism[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(9): 140-147.

动态履约保函额度下售电公司中长期交易模型

Medium and Long-Term Transaction Model for Power Selling Companies Considering Dynamic Adjustment of Performance Guarantee Quota

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 43

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴玲, 刘浩, 刘秋华, 郑亚先. 可再生能源配额制下售电公司多市场交易决策[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(7): 1-10.
[2]	温钱惠, 魏震波, 张勇林, 梁政, 何永祥. 考虑保险机制与用户需求响应的售电公司优化运营[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(1): 47-54.
[3]	韩光, 杨晨光, 吴向明, 陶鹏, 周辉, 胡银龙. 一种售电公司经济调度双层优化方法[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(10): 158-165.
[4]	喻理, 李成鑫, 张宇, 刘宜成. 偏差电量考核机制下售电公司CCHP系统运行优化模型[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(10): 98-105.
[5]	徐晓，陈中，丁宏恩，方国权，陈妍希，杜璞良. 面向区域售电公司的边缘计算架构设计探讨[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(7): 41-47.
[6]	高瑞，郭红霞，杨苹，郭敏铧，任智君. 基于用户侧可调节资源的售电公司实时市场偏差电量管控策略[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(6): 114-122.
[7]	高乾恒，黄帅飞，李二超，董治强，李潇逸. 市场环境下含氢储能的售电公司优化调度[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(4): 42-48.
[8]	王腾飞，王辉，冷亚军，赵文会. RPS与偏差电量考核下考虑微电网群的售电公司盈利模型[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(1): 96-103.
[9]	杨用春，穆启天，高亚静，肖湘宁. 考虑谐波治理的售电公司供电服务套餐设计[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(7): 32-40.
[10]	杨思渊,姜子卿，艾芊，何奇琳. 售电公司商业模式国际经验及启示[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(3): 123-.
[11]	张潜, 谭忠富，刘敦楠 . 售电公司参与需求侧响应的系统动力学研究[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(2): 124-.
[12]	杜蜻蜓,刘继春,王冬,杨常. 计入柔性负荷的售电公司参与市场竞价两阶段优化模型 [J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(6): 142-.