新型电力系统市场运行下面向多元负荷需求的电力零售套餐组合优化模型

张硕, 庞麓鸣, 李英姿, 王雨欣, 贺运政

电力建设 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 159-173.

PDF(3050 KB)
PDF(3050 KB)
电力建设 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 159-173. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2025.09.013
电力经济

新型电力系统市场运行下面向多元负荷需求的电力零售套餐组合优化模型

作者信息 +

Retail Package Combination Optimization Model for Multi-load Demands under Marketing-based New-Type Power System

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】为推进全国统一电力市场建设,提升电力零售市场资源优化配置能力,文章开展面向多元负荷需求的电力零售套餐研究,构建了新型电力系统市场运行下面向多元负荷需求的电力零售套餐组合优化模型。【方法】首先,建立多元负荷参与的零售套餐交易架构,基于典型用户日负荷曲线设计多样化火电和绿电互补零售套餐;其次,构建零售套餐组合上下层模型,上层以零售商收益最大化为目标优化套餐价格,下层最小化用户购电成本得出套餐选择决策,并应用遗传算法进行求解;最后,选取典型用户进行案例分析,得出套餐定价结果、电量分配结果以及用户负荷调整情况。【结果】相较于单一种类套餐,零售商利润分别提升了60.84%、58.76%、62.90%、2.25%,用户整体支出降低了3.24%、4.33%、2.14%、2.34%;与仅考虑火电套餐相比,所提模型可使用户成本降低7.28%,零售商利润提升32.60%。此外,对用电需求、批发电价等因素进行敏感性分析,结果表明用电需求对零售商收益和用户成本影响更加显著。【结论】所提模型能够精确反映用户实际用电需求,有助于提升新能源消纳能力,充分降低用户成本并提升零售商收益,为解决能源零售套餐单一化问题,实现售电方和用户方互利共赢提供有益参考。

Abstract

[Objective] To build a unified national electricity market and enhance the ability of the retail electricity market to optimize resource allocation, this study examines electricity retail packages for multi-load demands and constructs a retail package combination optimization model for multi-load demands under a marketing-based new-type power system. [Methods] First, a retail package-trading structure with multiple loads was established. Diversified thermal and green power retail packages were designed based on the daily load curves of typical users. Second, a bilevel model for retail package combinations was constructed. In the upper-level model, the package price is optimized to maximize the revenue of the electricity retailer; the lower-level model minimizes the customer's electricity purchasing cost and determines the package selection. A genetic algorithm was applied to solve the model. Finally, typical users were selected as case studies to analyze package pricing results, power allocation outcomes, and user load adjustments. [Results] Compared with a single type of package, retailer profits improved by 60.84%, 58.76%, 62.90%, and 2.25%, whereas total user costs decreased by 3.24%, 4.33%, 2.14%, and 2.34%, respectively. The proposed model results in a 7.28% reduction in user costs and a 32.60% improvement in retailer profits compared with considering only thermal power packages. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for electricity demand and wholesale tariffs. Electricity demand has a significant impact on both retailer profits and user costs. [Conclusions] The results show that the proposed model can accurately reflect the actual electricity demand of users and help enhance the capacity for new energy consumption, effectively reduce user costs, and increase retailer profits. It provides a useful reference for addressing the issue of retail package homogenization and achieving a mutually beneficial, win-win outcome for both electricity retailers and customers.

关键词

负荷特性 / 零售套餐定价 / 绿电交易 / 双层优化模型

Key words

load characteristics / retail package pricing / green electricity trading / bi-level optimization model

引用本文

导出引用
张硕, 庞麓鸣, 李英姿, . 新型电力系统市场运行下面向多元负荷需求的电力零售套餐组合优化模型[J]. 电力建设. 2025, 46(9): 159-173 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2025.09.013
ZHANG Shuo, PANG Luming, LI Yingzi, et al. Retail Package Combination Optimization Model for Multi-load Demands under Marketing-based New-Type Power System[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2025, 46(9): 159-173 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2025.09.013
中图分类号: TM73;F426   

参考文献

[1]
《新型电力系统发展蓝皮书》编写组. 新型电力系统发展蓝皮书[M/OL]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2023. (2023-06-02) [2024-10-13]. https://www.nea.gov.cn/download/xxdlxtfzlpsgk.pdf.
[2]
国家发展改革委国家能源局国家数据局关于印发《加快构建新型电力系统行动方案(2024—2027年)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2024-07-25) [2024-10-13]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_6966863.htm.
[3]
国家发展改革委国家能源局关于加快建设全国统一电力市场体系的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2022-01-18) [2024-10-13]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/30/content_5671296.htm.
[4]
张硕, 张家源, 李英姿, 等. 多元主体驱动的新型电力系统市场化运行仿真关键技术[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(9): 178-188.
摘要
在“双碳”目标下,市场化是实现新型电力系统可持续发展的有效途径,建模仿真因其可分析动态过程且易于反复实验的优点,成为该领域的重要研究方法。目前电力市场仿真缺乏全场景全过程的研究,且难以满足多元市场主体的建模仿真需求。基于此,文章进行了多元主体参与电力市场的行为模型构建,提出了仿真系统开发的基本框架和关键技术并进行了应用。首先,对新型电力系统主要构成要素进行了定义,构建了智能主体层次行为模型,并结合强化学习原理对其决策过程进行了细化;其次,提出了模型构建、市场化运行仿真、数据库和仿真分析等关键技术,并进行仿真系统的开发和应用,完整模拟了多元主体驱动电力系统演化的过程;最后,对仿真技术的后续发展方向进行了展望。
ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Jiayuan, LI Yingzi, et al. Key simulation technology for market-based operation of new power system driven by multiple agents[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(9): 178-188.

Aiming at the dual-carbon goal, marketization is an effective approach to achieve the safe and stable operation as well as the sustainable development of a new power system. Simulation has become an important research method in this field because it enables the analysis of dynamic processes and facilitates the repetition of experiments. At present, power market simulations do not investigate the whole scene and process. Thus, it is difficult to meet the modeling and simulation specifications of multiple market players. Therefore, this study constructed a behavior model of multi-subject participation in the electricity market, setting and applying the basic framework and key technologies of simulation system development. First, the main components of a new power system were defined, the hierarchical behavior model of intelligent agents was constructed, and the decision-making process was refined based on the principle of reinforcement learning. Second, key technologies such as model construction, market-oriented operation simulation, database, and simulation analysis were explored, and the development and application of simulation systems were performed. The evolution process of a multi-subject driving power system was completely simulated. Finally, the prospects of future development directions of simulation technology were studied.

[5]
潘虹锦, 高红均, 杨艳红, 等. 基于主从博弈的售电商多元零售套餐设计与多级市场购电策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(13): 4785-4800.
PAN Hongjin, GAO Hongjun, YANG Yanhong, et al. Multi-type retail packages design and multi-level market power purchase strategy for electricity retailers based on master-slave game[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(13): 4785-4800.
[6]
邱小燕, 郭鸿业, 陈启鑫, 等. 我国电力零售市场商业套餐模式选择探究: 电力零售套餐多维度影响因素分析及优化设计[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(5): 92-96, 222.
QIU Xiaoyan, GUO Hongye, CHEN Qixin, et al. Research on the selection of commercial package models in China’s electricity retail market: multidimensional influencing factors analysis and enhanced design of electricity retailing packages[J]. Price (Theory & Practice), 2024(5): 92-96, 222.
[7]
刘瑶. 计及用户选择的售电商零售套餐策略优化研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2022.
LIU Yao. Reaearch on optimization of retail package of electricity retailers considering user selection[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2022.
[8]
BIAN H H, ZHONG Y Q, SUN J S, et al. Study on power consumption load forecast based on K-means clustering and FCM-BP model[J]. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 693-700.
[9]
赵莎莎, 袁葆, 安亚刚, 等. 智能电网需求侧用户参与度研究模型[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(3): 60-66.
ZHAO Shasha, YUAN Bao, AN Yagang, et al. A study on the research model of user participation on the demand side of the smart grid[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2024, 40(3): 60-66.
[10]
YANG M, WANG D, ZHANG W, et al. A centralized power prediction method for large-scale wind power clusters based on dynamic graph neural network[J]. Energy, 2024, 310: 133210.
[11]
吴敬慧, 张杰, 潘舒妍, 等. 电力现货市场中标准零售套餐设计: 基于用户分群的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2019(12): 132-136.
WU Jinghui, ZHANG Jie, PAN Shuyan, et al. Standard retail tariff design based on customer clustering in electricity spot market[J]. Price (Theory & Practice), 2019(12): 132-136.
[12]
陈景文, 单茜, 刘耀先, 等. 面向电力市场的用户侧电力电量预测综述[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(2): 10-20.
CHEN Jingwen, SHAN Xi, LIU Yaoxian, et al. A review of user-side power and energy forecasting for electricity market[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2024, 40(2): 10-20.
[13]
郭祚刚, 徐敏, 李睿智, 等. 基于VaR理论的综合能源零售市场最优策略[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(6): 9-16.
摘要
随着综合能源系统推广,多能源供给-传输-使用耦合程度加深,用户用能形式逐渐多样化,能源市场改革形成的零售市场内涵不断丰富。传统单一能源独立供给-定价的零售市场不能有效引导用户用能、提高系统经济性,综合能源系统零售市场的定价策略亟待研究。计及用户多能负荷、现货价格的随机性和用户需求响应提出基于风险价值(value at risk, VaR)理论的综合能源园区零售最优定价方法,并建立了静态零售定价-日前优化调度两阶段模型,研究了综合能源服务商的静态零售定价最优策略。第一阶段为计及日前阶段用户负荷、现货价格随机性的零售定价优化模型。第二阶段为第一阶段最优零售价格下的日前优化调度模型。最后采用粒子群-线性规划算法对所提两阶段模型进行迭代求解。算例结果表明,基于VaR的零售定价方法可以有效降低综合能源服务商参与零售市场的风险。
GUO Zuogang, XU Min, LI Ruizhi, et al. Optimal strategy of integrated energy retail market based on VaR theory[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2021, 42(6): 9-16.

With the promotion of integrated energy system, the coupling of multiple energies in terms of supply, transmission and use increases, the forms of energy use are gradually diversified, and the connotation of retail market is constantly enriched under the reform of energy market. Under the traditional retail market of single energy, independent supply and pricing method cannot effectively guide users to use energy and improve the economic efficiency. Therefore, it is urgent to study the pricing strategy for retail market of integrated energy system. In this paper, optimal retail pricing method for the comprehensive energy park on the basis of value at risk (VaR) theory is proposed considering multi-energy load, randomness of spot price and demand response. A two-stage model of static retail pricing and day-ahead optimal scheduling is established to study the optimal static retail pricing strategy of integrated energy service providers. The first stage is a retail pricing optimization model that takes into account day-ahead energy load and spot price randomness. The second stage is the day-ahead optimal scheduling model under the optimal retail price in the first stage. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) linear programming algorithm is used to solve the two-stage model iteratively. The results show that VaR-based retail pricing can effectively reduce the risk of integrated energy service providers participating in the retail market.

[14]
徐弘升, 钱涛, 王珂, 等. 基于多智能体策略梯度的售电商购电报价及售电定价联合策略优化[J/OL]. 电力建设, 2024. (2024-03-11) [2024-10-13]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2583.TM.20240308.1756.008.
XU Hongsheng, QIAN Tao, WANG Ke, et al. Joint strategy optimization of electricity purchase quotation and electricity sale pricing for electricity sellers based on multi-agent strategy gradient[J/OL]. Electric Power Construction, 2024. (2024-03-11) [2024-10-13]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2583.TM.20240308.1756.008.
[15]
林宇豪, 王弘利, 廖烽然, 等. 考虑用户有限理性的需求侧电能共享价格套餐设计[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(11): 148-160.
LIN Yuhao, WANG Hongli, LIAO Fengran, et al. Pricing package design for energy sharing on the power demand side considering bounded rationality of users[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(11): 148-160.
[16]
陈玮, 梁博淼, 蒙文川, 等. 计及负荷和电价不确定性的电力零售公司购电组合优化[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(7): 54-61.
摘要
随着我国电力市场改革的深化,售电侧随之逐步开放,已经成立了很多售电公司并参与了电力零售业务。如何构造在多个市场的购电组合优化策略是电力零售公司关注的重要问题。为发展电力零售公司的购电组合优化策略,必须适当考虑负荷需求和市场电价的不确定性从而进行风险管理。在此背景下,首先以h为单位构造了描述1天内的负荷需求和电力价格的日向量,并采用区间数来描述负荷和电价的波动范围。另一方面,模拟了零售公司在用户侧实施分时电价时对负荷调整和所占市场份额的影响。之后,以电力零售公司日利润总和最大为目标,建立了购电组合优化的强化区间线性规划(enhanced interval linear programming,EILP)模型,并采用解析方法求解。最后,采用美国PJM (Pennsylvania,New Jersey,Maryland)电力市场的负荷和电力价格实际数据,对所提出的方法做了说明。
CHEN Wei, LIANG Bomiao, MENG Wenchuan, et al. Optimal portfolio strategies of purchasing electricity for electricity retail companies considering load and electricity price uncertainties[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2016, 37(7): 54-61.
With the development of electricity market reform, electricity retail markets are established and many electricity retail companies are gradually built up and involved in electricity retail business. How to build the optimal portfolio strategies for purchasing electricity by an electricity retail company in multiple markets is an issue with extensive concern. To this end, it is necessary to consider the uncertainties of load demand and electricity prices in the market environment so as to manage risk associated. Given this background, two vectors representing hourly load demands and electricity prices in the real-time electricity market are first employed for a specified day, and interval numbers are used to represent the fluctuation range of load and electricity price. On the other hand, the impacts of the time-of-use (TOU) retail electricity price for terminal users on the load shift and market share of the electricity retail company concerned are investigated. Then, an enhanced interval linear programming (EILP) model is presented with the objective of maximizing the overall profit of the electricity retail company in a given day, and solved by an analytic approach. Finally, actual load and electricity price data from the PJM (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland) electricity market in USA are employed to demonstrate the presented method.
[17]
曹昉, 李欣宁, 刘思佳, 等. 基于消费者参考价格决策及用户黏性的售电套餐优化[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(14): 67-74.
CAO Fang, LI Xinning, LIU Sijia, et al. Optimization of sales package for end-users based on user stickiness and reference pricing decision of consumers[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(14): 67-74.
[18]
HALYNSKA Y, BONDAR T. Combined electricity pricing model taking into account the “green tariff” and traditional factors[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 234: 00019.
[19]
侯佳萱, 林振智, 杨莉, 等. 面向需求侧主动响应的工商业用户电力套餐优化设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(24): 11-19.
HOU Jiaxuan, LIN Zhenzhi, YANG Li, et al. Design of electricity plans for industrial and commercial customers oriented to active demand response on power demand side[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(24): 11-19.
[20]
STEELE SANTOS P E, CORADI LEME R, GALVÃO L. On the electrical two-part tariff: the Brazilian perspective[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 40: 123-130.
[21]
何永秀, 陈奋开, 叶钰童, 等. 澳大利亚零售市场电价套餐的经验及启示[J]. 智慧电力, 2019, 47(7): 19-23, 28.
HE Yongxiu, CHEN Fenkai, YE Yutong, et al. Experience and enlightenment of electricity price package in Australian retail market[J]. Smart Power, 2019, 47(7): 19-23, 28.
[22]
彭一海, 刘继春, 刘俊勇. 两级电力市场环境下考虑多类型零售套餐的售电公司购售电策略[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(3): 944-957.
PENG Yihai, LIU Jichun, LIU Junyong. Electricity purchasing and selling strategies for electricity retailers considering multiple types of retail packages in two level electricity market[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(3): 944-957.
[23]
GAO H J, CHEN Q Z, HE S J, et al. Electricity-carbon coupling retail package optimization considering low-carbon benefits of distributed renewable energy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 449: 141598.
[24]
张浩, 王宣元, 宁卜, 等. 考虑响应稳定度的峰谷型售电套餐决策方法[J]. 电气传动, 2022, 52(19): 68-74.
ZHANG Hao, WANG Xuanyuan, NING Bo, et al. A decision-making method for peak-valley power electricity package considering response stability[J]. Electric Drive, 2022, 52(19): 68-74.
[25]
张智, 卢峰, 林振智, 等. 考虑用户有限理性的售电公司峰谷组合电力套餐设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(16): 114-123.
ZHANG Zhi, LU Feng, LIN Zhenzhi, et al. Peak-valley combination electricity package design for electricity retailer considering bounded rationality of consumers[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(16): 114-123.
[26]
LIU J C, HUANG R R, XU X, et al. Reliability service-based strategies for improving electricity retailer competitiveness using a novel heuristic algorithm[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 139798.
[27]
GAO H J, ZHAO Y B, HE S J, et al. Demand response management of community integrated energy system: a multi-energy retail package perspective[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 330: 120278.
[28]
舒征宇, 朱凯翔, 王灿, 等. 考虑碳交易的虚拟电厂日前电力市场竞价策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43(5): 58-68, 149.
SHU Zhengyu, ZHU Kaixiang, WANG Can, et al. Virtual power plants participating in day-ahead electricity market bidding strategy considering carbon trading[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2024, 43(5): 58-68, 149.
[29]
郁海彬, 张煜晨, 刘扬洋, 等. 碳交易机制下多主体虚拟电厂参与电力市场的优化调度竞标策略[J]. 发电技术, 2023, 44(5): 634-644.
摘要
碳交易机制下,虚拟电厂(virtual power plant,VPP)聚合分布式能源(distributed energy resource,DER)参与电力市场(electricity market,EM)交易有助于新能源消纳与提升环境效益。为此,首先,构建风电、光伏、可控分布式电源、储能及柔性负荷的多主体VPP模型,并制定各主体参与电能量市场(electric energy market,EEM)和调峰市场(peak regulating market,PRM)竞标策略。通过EEM及PRM算例展现了VPP参与调峰竞标实现VPP效益最大化及各DER成员利益的合理分配。其次,引入碳交易机制,分析碳交易价格变化与风光消纳率、碳排放量及VPP收益之间的关联性。最后,进一步探索碳汇资源交易对电力价格、产量及能源需求变化率的影响,为碳汇价值的生态保护补偿机制提供依据,也为电-碳市场协同下碳市场(carbon market,CM)对EM的价格传导效应及CM价格机制的优化设计提供参考。
YU Haibin, ZHANG Yuchen, LIU Yangyang, et al. Optimal dispatching bidding strategy of multi-agent virtual power plant participating in electricity market under carbon trading mechanism[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 634-644.

Under the carbon trading mechanism, virtual power plants (VPP) aggregating distributed energy resource (DER) to participate in electricity market (EM) trading will help new energy consumption and improve environmental benefits. This paper constructed a multi-agent VPP model including wind turbine, photovoltaic power, controllable distribution generation, stored energy, and flexible load, and formulated bidding strategies for each entity participating in the electric energy market (EEM) and peak regulating market (PRM). The EEM and PRM examples showed that participating in peak regulating bidding by VPP could achieve the maximum benefits of VPP and reasonable distribution of the interests among DER members. Moreover, this paper introduced the carbon trading mechanism, analyzed the correlation between changes in carbon trading price and wind and solar consumption rate, carbon emissions and VPP benefits, and further explored the impact of carbon sink resource trading on electricity price, output and energy demand change rate. It provided a basis for the ecological protection compensation mechanism of carbon sink value, and also provided a reference for the price transmission effect of carbon market (CM) on EM under the coordination of electricity-carbon market and the optimization design of CM price mechanism.

[30]
张硕, 肖阳明, 李英姿, 等. 新型电力系统电-碳-绿证市场协同运行的区块链关键技术[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(11): 1-12.
摘要
新型电力系统是构建新型能源体系和实现“双碳”目标的基础支撑,电力市场、碳市场、绿证市场协同运行是实现新型电力系统市场化运行的必然路径。为此,提出了电-碳-绿证市场协同运行的区块链关键技术体系。首先,提炼了电-碳-绿证市场协同运行的体系架构,从产品、主体、政策3个角度分析了市场间的协同运作情况。其次,构建了基于区块链技术的市场运行体系:建立了一个统一的积分认证机制来衔接电-碳-绿证市场之间的交易标的物;结合区块链技术的智能合约确保交易的透明和可靠性;将共识机制结合积分认证应用于协同市场,确保参与方之间的一致性以及协同性;通过跟踪电力的来源去向,构建了电-碳-绿证溯源模型来确保电力数据的准确性。最后,提出建设电-碳-绿证体系建议,聚焦于政策、技术、试点三方面为新型电力系统市场化运行提供辅助决策。
ZHANG Shuo, XIAO Yangming, LI Yingzi, et al. Collaborative operation of electricity-carbon-green market of new-type power system based on blockchain technology[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(11): 1-12.

New-type power system are the foundations and supports for building new energy systems and achieving dual-carbon reduction goals. The coordinated operation of electricity, carbon, and green certificate markets is an inevitable path for the marketization of new-type power system. To this end, this article proposes a blockchain system for the coordinated operation of electricity, carbon, and green certificate markets. First, we refine the system architecture governing the coordinated operation of the electricity-carbon-green certificate markets and analyze the collaborative operation among the markets from the perspective of each trading entity.Second, the market operation system based on blockchain technology is constructed: a unified point certification mechanism is established to connect the transaction objects between the electric-carbon-green certificate market; Smart contracts combined with blockchain technology ensure transparency and reliability of transactions; The consensus mechanism combined with the points certification is applied to the collaborative market to ensure the consistency and synergy between participants; By tracking the source of electricity, the electric-carbon-green certificate traceability model is constructed to ensure the accuracy of power data. Finally, the paper puts forward the suggestion of constructing the electric-carbon-green certificate system, focusing on the policy, technology and pilot three aspects to provide auxiliary decision for the market-oriented operation of the new power system.

[31]
李振坤, 李逸沐, 罗潇, 等. 计及碳交易和绿电占比的园区微电网优化运行[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62(5): 130-139.
LI Zhenkun, LI Yimu, LUO Xiao, et al. Optimal operation of microgrid in the park considering carbon trading and the proportion of green electricity[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2025, 62(5): 130-139.
[32]
张青苗, 陈来军, 马恒瑞, 等. 基于主从博弈的共享储能分时电价策略[J]. 智慧电力, 2022, 50(7): 82-88.
ZHANG Qingmiao, CHEN Laijun, MA Hengrui, et al. Time-of-use price strategy for shared energy storage based on Stackelberg game[J]. Smart Power, 2022, 50(7): 82-88.
[33]
王均, 黄钶然, 许潇, 等. 基于阶梯碳价和自适应分时电价的电动汽车有序充电[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(2): 64-71.
WANG Jun, HUANG Keran, XU Xiao, et al. Ordered charging of electric vehicles based on ladder-type carbon price and adaptive time-of-use electricity price[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44(2): 64-71.
[34]
宋明珍, 马腾, 孔令丞, 等. 动力电池梯次利用下风力发电企业储能电站租赁策略选择: 容量计费还是两部制收费?[J/OL]. 中国管理科学. (2024-05-20)[2024-10-13]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2752.
SONG Mingzhen, MA Teng, KONG Lingcheng, et al. Under cascade utilization of power battery the lease strategy selection of energy storage power station in wind power enterprises: capacity charging or two-part charging?[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science. (2024-05-20)[2024-10-13]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2752.
[35]
金仁云, 陈铁义, YU Yimeng. 基于动态演化博弈论的电力需求侧管理策略研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(12): 49-58.
JIN Renyun, CHEN Tieyi, YU Yimeng. A study on power demand side management strategies based on dynamic evolutionary game theory[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43(12): 49-58.
[36]
刘丽, 叶钰童, 王宝, 等. 面向省间电力现货市场的购电博弈竞价模型[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(7): 111-119.
LIU Li, YE Yutong, WANG Bao, et al. A game bidding model for electricity purchasing tailored to inter-provincial electricity spot market[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43(7): 111-119.
[37]
张浩鹏, 李泽宁, 薛屹洵, 等. 基于共享储能服务的智能楼宇双层优化配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(3): 899-911.
ZHANG Haopeng, LI Zening, XUE Yixun, et al. Bi-level optimal configuration of intelligent buildings based on shared energy storage services[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(3): 899-911.
[38]
张艺菲. 可再生能源电力消纳保障机制下售电商购售电决策优化[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2021.
ZHANG Yifei. Power Procurement and sale strategies for electricity retailers under the guarantee mechanism of renewable energy power[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2021.
[39]
赵晋泉, 吴天娇, 林孙奔, 等. 两种第三方主体参与的现货市场出清模式比较[J]. 电力工程技术, 2023, 42(6): 241-248.
ZHAO Jinquan, WU Tianjiao, LIN Sunben, et al. Comparison of two market clearing modes for day-ahead power market incorporating third-party entity[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2023, 42(6): 241-248.

基金

北京市社会科学基金项目(22GLB020)

编辑: 景贺峰
PDF(3050 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章
AI小编
你好!我是《电力建设》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?

/