基于数据驱动的关键节点辨识及扰动传播预测

吴茜, 张东霞, 龙望成, 王宁, 饶建业

电力建设 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 39-48.

PDF(2465 KB)
PDF(2465 KB)
电力建设 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 39-48. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.04.004
新型电力系统风险评估与风险防控·栏目主持:陈皓勇、张勇军、张沛、叶宇剑、肖东亮·

基于数据驱动的关键节点辨识及扰动传播预测

作者信息 +

Data-Driven Identification of Critical Nodes and Prediction of Disturbance Propagation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】电力系统数据表现出高随机、强互动、多耦合等特征,传统基于条件假设和模型简化的机理建模仿真分析其时效性无法满足大电网实时防御要求。利用大电网广域时空序列信息可以提高分析的精确性和时效性,突破机理模型的限制,对电网物理运行状态进行多层次态势感知。【方法】采用数据驱动并结合电网动态特性,基于随机矩阵理论对电网时空数据进行分析挖掘,克服传统基于电网物理拓扑的局限,实现关键节点的实时评估和辨识;根据关键节点评估结果,基于数据驱动采用马尔科夫链,提出扰动传播预测方法,实现对电网节点个性化风险评估和电网态势群体性预测分析。【结果】通过个性化风险评估电网节点,找出系统中风险节点即关键节点,探索将监测预警向预测预警转变;利用马尔科夫链预测相对受扰节点从而预测扰动传播,通过算例分析验证所提方法的有效性和合理性。该方法可在电力系统发生扰动后,对即将引发系统严重事故的关键节点进行重点监控,相比于其他辨识方法,该方法既考虑了系统电气特性,又考虑了系统拓扑特性,辨识结果会随着系统运行状态的改变而改变。【结论】通过提前预防控制保证系统的安全稳定运行,对防御大停电事故具有重要意义。

Abstract

[Objective] Power system data demonstrates features of high stochasticity, strong interaction, and multi-dimensional coupling. Traditional mechanistic modeling and simulation analyses, which rely on conditional assumptions and model simplifications, fail to meet the real-time defense requirements of large-scale power grids in terms of timeliness. By fully leveraging wide-area spatiotemporal sequence information from power grids, we can enhance analysis accuracy and timeliness while transcending the limitations of mechanistic models. This approach enables multi-level situational awareness of the physical operational states of power systems, facilitating more effective real-time defense strategies. [Methods] This paper presents a method to promote the safe and stable operation of the power grid. Based on the dynamic characteristics of the power grid, the spatiotemporal data are analyzed and excavated by random matrix theory. This method overcomes the limitations of the traditional grid-based physical topology, realizing the real-time assessment and identification of critical nodes in the system. According to assessment results of critical nodes, the disturbance propagation is predicted based on data-driven Markov chain. The method achieves the personalized risk assessment of grid nodes and collective predictive analysis of grid situations. [Results] This paper focuses on personalized risk assessment of nodes in the power grid, identifying risk nodes or key nodes in the system. By using the method proposed in this paper to explore the transition from monitoring and warning to predictive warning. The effectiveness and rationality of the proposed method can be verified through case analysis by using Markov chain to predict the propagation of disturbances relative to disturbed nodes. This study enables early warning of the disturbance propagation when the power grid disturbance occurs, and focuses on the critical nodes that will cause serious accidents in advance. Compared with other identification methods, the proposed approach takes into account both the electrical characteristics and topological properties of the system, with its identification results dynamically adapting to changes in system operating conditions. [Conclusions] Prevention and control are conducted in advance to ensure the safe and stable operation of the system, which is of great significance to the defense of blackouts.

关键词

数据挖掘 / 随机矩阵 / 关键节点 / 扰动传播

Key words

data mining / stochastic matrix / critical nodes / disturbance propagation

引用本文

导出引用
吴茜, 张东霞, 龙望成, . 基于数据驱动的关键节点辨识及扰动传播预测[J]. 电力建设. 2026, 47(4): 39-48 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.04.004
WU Qian, ZHANG Dongxia, LONG Wangcheng, et al. Data-Driven Identification of Critical Nodes and Prediction of Disturbance Propagation[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2026, 47(4): 39-48 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.04.004
中图分类号: TM73   

参考文献

[1]
王锡凡. 现代电力系统分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
[2]
艾渊, 杨昊, 杨晓华, 等. 面向新型电力系统N-1静态安全评估的深度时空数据驱动模型研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62(11): 103-110.
AI Yuan, YANG Hao, YANG Xiaohua, et al. Research on deep spatiotemporal data-driven model for novel power system N-1 static security assessment[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2025, 62(11): 103-110.
[3]
王伟胜, 林伟芳, 何国庆, 等. 美国得州2021年大停电事故对我国新能源发展的启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(12): 4033-4043.
WANG Weisheng, LIN Weifang, HE Guoqing, et al. Enlightenment of 2021 Texas blackout to the renewable energy development in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(12): 4033-4043.
[4]
陈星霖, 邵光正, 童凡杰, 等. 基于“情景-应对”的城市大面积停电应急联动机制与策略[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2023, 25(3): 99-105.
CHEN Xinglin, SHAO Guangzheng, TONG Fanjie, et al. Scenario-response-based emergency linkage mechanism and strategy for large-scale blackouts in cities[J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2023, 25(3): 99-105.
[5]
刘道伟, 李柏青, 邵广惠, 等. 基于大数据及人工智能的大电网智能调控系统框架[J]. 电力信息与通信技术, 2019, 17(3): 14-21.
LIU Daowei, LI Baiqing, SHAO Guanghui, et al. Intelligent control system framework based on big data and artificial intelligence for large power grid[J]. Electric Power Information and Communication Technology, 2019, 17(3): 14-21.
[6]
韩广炀, 孙贤明, 耿俊琪, 等. 基于改进盈利主导者算法的电网脆弱线路辨识[J]. 供用电, 2025, 42(3): 68-75, 85.
HAN Guangyang, SUN Xianming, GENG Junqi, et al. Identification of vulnerable lines in power grid based on improved profit leader algorithm[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2025, 42(3): 68-75, 85.
[7]
刘文霞, 刘岩东, 李承泽, 等. 基于随机优化的城市供电网络拓扑场景集合建模与关键节点辨识[J/OL]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2024:1-20.(2024-09-13) [2025-09-11] https://link.cnki.net/urlid/13.1212.tm.20240912.1803.002.
LIU Wenxia, LIU Yandong, LI Chengze, et al. Identification of critical nodes in urban power grid under deliberate attack based on incomplete information grid inversion method[J/OL]. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2024:1-20.(2024-09-13) [2025-09-11] https://link.cnki.net/urlid/13.1212.tm.20240912.1803.002.
[8]
鞠文云, 李银红. 基于最大流传输贡献度的电力网关键线路和节点辨识[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36(9): 6-12.
JU Wenyun, LI Yinhong. Identification of critical lines and nodes in power grid based on maximum flow transmission contribution degree[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(9): 6-12.
[9]
王佳裕, 顾雪平, 王涛, 等. 一种综合潮流追踪和链接分析的电力系统关键节点识别方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(6): 22-29.
WANG Jiayu, GU Xueping, WANG Tao, et al. Power system critical node identification based on power tracing and link analysis method[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(6): 22-29.
[10]
王涛, 高成彬, 顾雪平, 等. 基于功率介数的电网关键环节辨识[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(7): 1907-1913.
WANG Tao, GAO Chengbin, GU Xueping, et al. Power betweenness based identification of power grid critical links[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(7): 1907-1913.
[11]
王德林, 王晓茹. 电力系统中机电扰动的传播特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(19): 18-24.
WANG Delin, WANG Xiaoru. Characteristic analysis of electromechanical disturbance propagation for power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2007, 27(19): 18-24.
[12]
WANG K, ZHANG B H, ZHANG Z, et al. An electrical betweenness approach for vulnerability assessment of power grids considering the capacity of generators and load[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2011, 390(23/24): 4692-4701.
[13]
史进. 基于复杂网络理论的电力系统网络模型及网络性能分析的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2008.
SHI Jin. Network model and structure performance analysis of power system based on complex network theory[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2008.
[14]
杨胜春, 汤必强, 姚建国, 等. 基于态势感知的电网自动智能调度架构及关键技术[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(1): 3635-3641.
YANG Shengchun, TANG Biqiang, YAO Jianguo, et al. Architecture and key technologies for situational awareness based automatic intelligent dispatching of power grid[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(1): 3635-3641.
[15]
田世明, 陈希, 朱朝阳, 等. 电力应急管理理论与技术对策[J]. 电网技术, 2007, 31(24): 22-27.
TIAN Shiming, CHEN Xi, ZHU Chaoyang, et al. Theory of electric power emergency management and its technological countermeasures[J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(24): 22-27.
[16]
王波, 马富齐, 王红霞. 新型并网主体安全风险辨识的数据特征、关键技术及防控挑战[J]. 南方电网技术, 2025, 19(7): 15-29.
摘要
在“双碳”目标驱动下,新型电力系统用户侧因分布式光伏、电动汽车充电桩、储能设备等新型并网主体的大规模接入面临多维安全风险挑战。首先系统分析了新型并网主体大规模接入引发的设备安全、电网安全及社会安全等问题,并指出了当前技术与管理层面的核心瓶颈,如设备质量不均、跨模态数据融合困难、安全防护缺失等。针对多模态数据的异构性、语义差异及关联特性,提出了多模态大模型构建技术,涵盖数据增强生成、跨模态语义对齐及参数高效微调方法,以提升风险感知精度。此外,从网架优化、智能运维、韧性提升三方面提出一体化安全防控对策,为新型电力系统安全治理提供了理论支撑与实践路径,助力“双碳”目标下能源转型与安全协同发展。
WANG Bo, MA Fuqi, WANG Hongxia, Data characteristics, key technologies and prevention and control challenges of security risk identification for new grid connected entities[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2025, 19(7): 15-29.

Driven by the "dual carbon" goals, the user side of the new power system faces multidimensional security risks due to the large-scale integration of new grid-connected entities such as distributed photovoltaic systems, electric vehicle charging stations, and energy storage equipment.Firstly, the challenges to equipment safety, grid security, and societal safety posed by the massive integration of these new entities are systematically analyzed, core bottlenecks at the technical and managerial levels, such as uneven equipment quality, difficulties in cross-modal data fusion, and insufficient safety protections, are highlighted. To address the heterogeneity, semantic differences, and correlation characteristics of multimodal data, a multimodal large model construction technology is proposed, incorporating data augmentation generation, cross-modal semantic alignment, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods to enhance risk perception accuracy. Furthermore, integrated security prevention and control strategies are introduced from three perspectives: grid optimization, intelligent operation and maintenance, and resilience enhancement. These measures provide theoretical support and practical pathways for the security governance of the new power system, facilitating the coordinated development of energy transition and security under the "dual carbon" objectives.

[17]
李柏青, 刘道伟, 秦晓辉, 等. 信息驱动的大电网全景安全防御概念及理论框架[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(21): 5796-5805, 6022.
LI Baiqing, LIU Daowei, QIN Xiaohui, et al. Concept and theory framework of panoramic security defense for bulk power system driven by information[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(21): 5796-5805, 6022.
[18]
吴茜, 张东霞, 刘道伟, 等. 基于随机矩阵理论的电网静态稳定态势评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(20): 5414-5420, 5717.
WU Qian, ZHANG Dongxia, LIU Daowei, et al. A method for power system steady stability situation assessment based on random matrix theory[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(20): 5414-5420, 5717.
[19]
HE X, AI Q, QIU R C, et al. A big data architecture design for smart grids based on random matrix theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015: 1.
[20]
徐心怡, 贺兴, 艾芊, 等. 基于随机矩阵理论的配电网运行状态相关性分析方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(3): 781-790.
XU Xinyi, HE Xing, AI Qian, et al. A correlation analysis method for operation status of distribution network based on random matrix theory[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(3): 781-790.
[21]
魏大千, 王波, 刘涤尘, 等. 高维随机矩阵描述下的量测大数据建模与异常数据检测方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(增刊): 59-66.
WEI Daqian, WANG Bo, LIU Dichen, et al. A method for WAMS big data modeling and abnormal data detection with large random matrices[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(S1): 59-66.
[22]
严英杰, 盛戈皞, 王辉, 等. 基于高维随机矩阵大数据分析模型的输变电设备关键性能评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 435-445, 600.
YAN Yingjie, SHENG Gehao, WANG Hui, et al. The key state assessment method of power transmission equipment using big data analyzing model based on large dimensional random matrix[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(2): 435-445, 600.
[23]
HANDEL R van. Probability in high dimension[R]. Princeton: Princeton University, 2014.
[24]
GUIONNET A, KRISHNAPUR M, ZEITOUNI O. The single ring theorem[EB/OL]. 2009: arXiv: 0909.2214.(2025-09-11) https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2214
[25]
BENAYCH-GEORGES F, ROCHET J. Outliers in the single ring theorem[J]. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 2016, 165(1): 313-363.
[26]
廖瑞金, 肖中男, 巩晶, 等. 应用马尔科夫模型评估电力变压器可靠性[J]. 高电压技术, 2010, 36(2): 322-328.
LIAO Ruijin, XIAO Zhongnan, GONG Jing, et al. Markov model for reliability assessment of power transformers[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2010, 36(2): 322-328.
[27]
谢开贵, 马怀冬, 胡博, 等. 基于马尔可夫状态空间图法的换流变系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(9): 71-78.
XIE Kaigui, MA Huaidong, HU Bo, et al. Reliability evaluation of converter transformer system in HVDC transmission system based on Markov state space graph algorithm[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(9): 71-78.
[28]
张雪松, 王超, 程晓东. 基于马尔可夫状态空间法的超高压电网继电保护系统可靠性分析模型[J]. 电网技术, 2008, 32(13): 94-99.
ZHANG Xuesong, WANG Chao, CHENG Xiaodong. Reliability analysis model for protective relaying system of UHV power network based on Markov state-space method[J]. Power System Technology, 2008, 32(13): 94-99.
[29]
刘耀, 王明新, 曾南超. 高压直流输电保护装置冗余配置可靠性的接续分析[J]. 电网技术, 2010, 34(11): 93-99.
LIU Yao, WANG Mingxin, ZENG Nanchao. Sequential reliability analysis on redundant configuration of protective devices for HVDC power transmission system[J]. Power System Technology, 2010, 34(11): 93-99.
[30]
王韶, 周家启. 双回平行输电线路可靠性模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(9): 53-56.
WANG Shao, ZHOU Jiaqi. A reliability evaluation model for two transmission lines in parallel[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(9): 53-56.
[31]
HALILCEVIC S S, GUBINA F, GUBINA A F. Prediction of power system security levels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(1): 368-377.
[32]
熊俊, 肖先勇. 一种基于半马尔柯夫过程的配电系统可靠性经济评估方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2006, 34(12): 57-62.
XIONG Jun, XIAO Xianyong, A method of reliability cost assessment in distribution system based on Semi-Markov process[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2006, 34(12): 57-62.
[33]
刘文茂, 杨昆, 刘达, 等. 基于隐马尔科夫误差校正的日前电价预测[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2009, 33(10): 34-37.
LIU Wenmao, YANG Kun, LIU Da, et al. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting with error calibration by hidden Markov model[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(10): 34-37.
[34]
丁明, 徐宁舟. 基于马尔可夫链的光伏发电系统输出功率短期预测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(1): 152-157.
DING Ming, XU Ningzhou. A method to forecast short-term output power of photovoltaic generation system based on Markov chain[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(1): 152-157.

脚注

利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests) 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

基金

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFB2403100)

编辑: 曾文静
PDF(2465 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章
AI小编
你好!我是《电力建设》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?

/