低惯量新型电力系统频率安全评估与惯量协同控制研究综述

沈赋, 魏子玉, 束洪春, 曹旸, 华昊辰, 王健, 单节杉

电力建设 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 66-87.

PDF(1752 KB)
PDF(1752 KB)
电力建设 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 66-87. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.08.006
规划建设

低惯量新型电力系统频率安全评估与惯量协同控制研究综述

作者信息 +

Review on Frequency Security Assessment and Coordinated Inertia Control for Low-Inertia Modern Power Systems

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】在高比例可再生能源(renewable energy sources,RES)与电力电子设备大规模接入的背景下,传统同步发电机(synchronous generator,SG)占比持续下降,导致新型电力系统的等效转动惯量显著削弱,系统频率安全与稳定运行面临严峻挑战。本文旨在围绕电力系统惯量建模、安全评估与协同控制三大关键领域,对国内外相关研究进展进行系统梳理与综合评述,深入分析低惯量电力系统所面临的核心科学问题与关键技术瓶颈,明确未来研究的重点方向,为低惯量、高不确定性新型电力系统的安全稳定运行提供理论依据与技术路径参考。【方法】系统构建了低惯量新型电力系统安全稳定分析的核心技术体系。首先,分析了低惯量电力系统的本质特征与运行机理,在此基础上建立多维度惯量建模框架,涵盖同步发电机等效惯量建模、电力电子接口设备建模以及多时间尺度动态建模方法。其次,构建面向全运行场景的安全评估方法体系,包括频率安全评估、在线动态安全评估及不确定性条件下的安全评估方法。最后,提出面向空间、多时间尺度特性的协同控制策略,实现风电、光伏、储能与负荷等多类资源的协同优化控制,为系统规划与运行提供技术支撑。【结果】系统总结了低惯量新型电力系统从特性分析、惯量建模、安全评估到协同控制的完整技术体系,深化了对低惯量电力系统运行机理与安全问题的认识,为相关理论研究与工程实践提供了重要参考。【结论】本文研究对保障高比例可再生能源接入条件下新型电力系统的安全、稳定与高效运行具有重要意义。

Abstract

[Objective] The large-scale integration of high-penetration renewable energy sources(RES)and power-electronic-interfaced devices has continuously displaced the conventional synchronous generators(SG). This transition has led to a significant reduction in the equivalent rotational inertia of modern power systems, posing unprecedented challenges to frequency security and stable operation. This paper systematically reviews and critically analyzes the state-of-the-art research on power system inertia modeling, security assessment, and coordinated control. By identifying key scientific issues and technological bottlenecks associated with low-inertia power systems, this study clarifies future research priorities and establishes theoretical foundations and technical pathways to support the secure and stable operation of highly uncertain, low-inertia modern power systems. [Methods] This paper develops a comprehensive technical framework for the security and stability analysis of low-inertia modern power systems. First, the fundamental characteristics and operational mechanisms of such systems are examined, based on which a multi-dimensional inertia modeling framework is established, including equivalent inertia modeling of synchronous generators, modeling of power-electronic-interfaced devices, and multi-timescale dynamic modeling. Second, a unified security assessment framework covering diverse operating conditions is proposed, incorporating frequency security assessment, online dynamic security assessment, and assessment under uncertainty. Finally, coordinated control strategies are developed from both spatial and multi-timescale perspectives to enable the optimal coordination of heterogeneous resources—including wind power, photovoltaic systems, energy storage, and flexible loads—thereby supporting system planning and operation. [Results] This paper systematically summarizes the complete technical framework of low-inertia modern power systems, encompassing characteristic analysis, inertia modeling, security assessment, and coordinated control strategies. The presented review deepens the understanding of operational mechanisms and security challenges in low-inertia power systems and provides valuable references for both theoretical research and engineering practice. [Conclusions] The findings offer critical technical support for ensuring the secure, stable, and efficient operation of modern power systems with high penetration of renewable energy sources.

关键词

新型电力系统 / 低惯量 / 安全评估 / 协同控制

Key words

modern power system / low inertia / security assessment / coordinated control

引用本文

导出引用
沈赋, 魏子玉, 束洪春, . 低惯量新型电力系统频率安全评估与惯量协同控制研究综述[J]. 电力建设. 2026, 47(8): 66-87 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.08.006
SHEN Fu, WEI Ziyu, SHU Hongchun, et al. Review on Frequency Security Assessment and Coordinated Inertia Control for Low-Inertia Modern Power Systems[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2026, 47(8): 66-87 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.08.006
中图分类号: TM73   

参考文献

[1]
朱东海, 马玉梅, 胡家兵. 电网故障下新能源并网系统多时间尺度暂态稳定问题与研究现状[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(1): 212-231.
Zhu Donghai, Ma Yumei, Hu Jiabing. Multi-timescale transient stability issues and research status of renewable energy grid-connected systems during grid faults[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, 46(1): 212-231.
[2]
傅国斌, 杨凯璇, 孙海斌, 等. 低惯量电力系统频率安全约束优化运行研究综述与展望[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(9): 148-163.
Fu Guobin, Yang Kaixuan, Sun Haibin, et al. Frequency security constrained optimal operation of low-inertia power systems: review and prospects[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(9): 148-163.
[3]
樊陈, 姚建国, 张琦兵, 等. 英国“8·9”大停电事故振荡事件分析及思考[J]. 电力工程技术, 2020, 39(4): 34-41.
Fan Chen, Yao Jianguo, Zhang Qibing, et al. Reflection and analysis for oscillation of the blackout event of 9 August 2019 in UK[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2020, 39(4): 34-41.
[4]
张圣祺, 刘何毓, 汪飞, 等. 面向电网二次调频需求的“PXP”储能集群分布式均衡控制策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(3): 886-898.
Zhang Shengqi, Liu Heyu, Wang Fei, et al. A balancing control strategy for “power-X-power” energy storage cluster in system load frequency control[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(3): 886-898.
[5]
葛磊蛟, 郑轶文, 李小平, 等. 高比例分布式光伏接入下配电网多类型储能优化配置技术综述[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44(5): 1-11.
Ge Leijiao, Zheng Yiwen, Li Xiaoping, et al. A review of optimal allocation technologies for multi-type energy storage in distribution networks with high penetration of DPV[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44(5): 1-11.
[6]
陶思钰, 江福庆. 集群化发展模式下风电场预测、规划及控制关键技术综述[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43(1): 86-99.
Tao Siyu, Jiang Fuqing. Review of the key technologies of wind farm cluster prediction, planning and control[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2024, 43(1): 86-99.
[7]
宋魁. 基于离散时间域的电力场站汇集点等效惯量监控[J]. 现代工业经济和信息化, 2025, 15(8): 252-254.
Song Kui. Monitoring and analysis of equivalent inertia of power station convergence point based on discrete time domain[J]. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization, 2025, 15(8): 252-254.
[8]
曹斌, 原帅, 刘家豪, 等. 考虑频率动态响应实时分区的电力系统惯量在线评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(3): 930-940.
Cao Bin, Yuan Shuai, Liu Jiahao, et al. Power system online inertia estimation considering real-time clustering of frequency dynamic response[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47(3): 930-940.
[9]
汪进锋, 田野, 江霖, 等. 计及碳-绿证市场耦合的新能源和储能虚拟惯量-阻尼调度方法[J]. 广东电力, 2025, 38(8): 80-90.
Wang Jinfeng, Tian Ye, Jiang Lin, et al. Optimal virtual inertia-damping scheduling method for renewable energy and energy storage considering carbon-green certificate market coupling[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2025, 38(8): 80-90.
[10]
王彦婷, 文云峰, 郑文伟, 等. 电力系统临界惯量需求的优化仿真协同评估方法[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025-07-24. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20250724.1529.013.
Wang Yanting, Wen Yunfeng, Zheng Wenwei, et al. Optimization and simulation synergetic approach for power system critical inertia requirement assessment[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025-07-24. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20250724.1529.013.
[11]
王彤, 邢其鹏, 李鸿恩, 等. 计及虚拟惯量控制的DFIG等效惯量在线评估与响应特性分析[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(11): 52-60.
Wang Tong, Xing Qipeng, Li Hongen, et al. Online evaluation and response characteristics analysis of equivalent inertia of a doubly-fed induction generator incorporating virtual inertia control[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(11): 52-60.
[12]
贾焦心, 杨添淇, 颜湘武, 等. 电力电子并网装备等效惯量评估研究进展[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43(9): 3-10.
Jia Jiaoxin, Yang Tianqi, Yan Xiangwu, et al. Research progress on equivalent inertia estimation of grid-connected power electronic devices[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43(9): 3-10.
[13]
刘翔宇, 李慧斌, 顾雪平, 等. 考虑惯量充裕度与频率变化率的互联电网在线频率安全分析[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(5): 1780-1788.
Liu Xiangyu, Li Huibin, Gu Xueping, et al. On-line frequency security analysis of interconnected power grid considering inertia adequacy and RoCoF[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47(5): 1780-1788.
[14]
付利达, 贾清泉, 孙玲玲, 等. 构网/跟网型光伏逆变器混联的配电网有功无功双层调压策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49(12): 171-183.
Fu Lida, Jia Qingquan, Sun Lingling, et al. Bi-level voltage regulation strategy for active and reactive power of distribution network with hybrid grid-forming/grid-following photovoltaic inverters[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49(12): 171-183.
[15]
汪莹, 崔伟, 王聪, 等. 新能源基地柔性直流送出系统安全稳定评估方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2025, 41(1): 137-145.
Wang Ying, Cui Wei, Wang Cong, et al. A safety and stability evaluation method for new energy VSC-HVDC transmission systems[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2025, 41(1): 137-145.
[16]
杨悦, 臧哲, 成龙, 等. 基于“预测-控制-修正”闭环反馈的主动配电网鲁棒优化运行策略[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025-12-09. https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.251696.
Yang Yue, Zang Zhe, Cheng Long, et al. Robust optimization operation strategy for active distribution networks based on “prediction-control-correction” closed-loop feedback[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025-12-09. https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.251696.
[17]
Imris P, Taylor G A, Bradley M E, et al. A novel hardware-in-the-loop approach to investigate the impact of low system inertia on RoCoF relay settings[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(17): 6386.
This paper presents a novel hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) approach as used to investigate the impact of the reduction in inertia on the Great Britain (GB) electrical power system with regard to rate of change of frequency (RoCoF) settings for Loss-of-Mains (LoM) protection. Furthermore, the research as presented in this paper updates, enhances, and validates a reduced model of the Great Britain transmission system, as originally developed in DIgSILENT PowerFactory by the National Grid Electricity System Operator. The enhanced model has been developed for integrated use with the OPAL-RT real-time HIL simulation toolkit and is validated against phasor measurement unit (PMU) data from actual disturbance events using novel automated interfacing between both integrated simulation platforms, PowerFactory from DIgSILENT and ePHASORSIM from OPAL-RT. The corresponding simulations show that the updated reduced model is capable of capturing the dynamic behaviour of the GB transmission system, including both local and inter-area oscillations, with satisfactory accuracy. Finally, the paper presents HIL study results with the reduced model to investigate the influence of decreasing system inertia on the response of LoM protection relays. The studies show that decreasing system inertia may have a significant impact on LoM relays using RoCoF detection, particularly relays using the legacy G59 setting of 0.125 Hz/s. Initial studies have also demonstrated the potential for a previously unrecognised interaction between system oscillations and the 500 ms operating delay, as specified in G59 and G99 Engineering Recommendations. Consequently, faster local oscillations (>1 Hz) reset the relay and decrease the sensitivity, whereas slower inter-area oscillations (<1 Hz) appear to cause the relay to overestimate the average RoCoF.
[18]
O’Sullivan J, Rogers A, Flynn D, et al. Studying the maximum instantaneous non-synchronous generation in an island system: frequency stability challenges in Ireland[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2014, 29(6): 2943-2951.
[19]
ENTSO-E. Future system inertia[R]. Brussels: ENTSO-E, 2015.
[20]
EirGrid SONI. Ensuring a secure, reliable and efficient power system in a changing environment[R]. EirGrid, 2011.
[21]
黄全全, 韦徵, 曾嘉成, 等. 基于等效内电势重塑的构网型逆变器故障穿越控制策略[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2025, 41(10): 14-23.
Huang Quanquan, Wei Zheng, Zeng Jiacheng, et al. Fault ride-through control strategy for GFM inverters based on equivalent internal potential reshaping[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2025, 41(10): 14-23.
[22]
Tayyebi A, Groß D, Anta A, et al. Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid-forming power converters[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2020, 8(2): 1004-1018.
An inevitable consequence of the global power system transition toward nearly 100x0025; renewable-based generation is the loss of conventional bulk generation by synchronous machines (SMs), their inertia, and accompanying frequency- and voltage-control mechanisms. This gradual transformation of the power system to a low-inertia system leads to critical challenges in maintaining system stability. Novel control techniques for converters, so-called grid-forming strategies, are expected to address these challenges and replicate functionalities that, so far, have been provided by SMs. This article presents a low-inertia case study that includes SMs and converters controlled under various grid-forming techniques. In this article, the positive impact of the grid-forming converters (GFCs) on the frequency stability of SMs is highlighted, a qualitative analysis that provides insights into the frequency stability of the system is presented, we explore the behavior of the grid-forming controls when imposing the converter dc and ac current limitations, the importance of the dc dynamics in grid-forming control design as well as the critical need for an effective ac current limitation scheme are reported, and finally, we analyze how and when the interaction between the fast GFC and the slow SM dynamics can contribute to the system instability.
[23]
Crivellaro A, Tayyebi A, Gavriluta C, et al. Beyond low-inertia systems: massive integration of grid-forming power converters in transmission grids[C]// 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2020: 1-5.
[24]
杨尚瑾, 李德才, 庞广恒, 等. 基于锁相环同步的低惯量构网控制方法[J]. 电网技术, 2026, 50(4): 1423-1434.
Yang Shangjin, Li Decai, Pang Guangheng, et al. Low-inertia grid-forming control method based on phase-locked loop synchronization[J]. Power System Technology, 2026, 50(4): 1423-1434.
[25]
Chandorkar M C, Divan D M, Adapa R. Control of parallel connected inverters in standalone AC supply systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 1993, 29(1): 136-143.
[26]
王双双, 吴雪莲, 李兆伟, 等. 计及构网型新能源主动支撑特性的频率紧急控制适应性分析[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(2): 80-89.
Wang Shuangshuang, Wu Xuelian, Li Zhaowei, et al. Analysis of the adaptability of frequency emergency control considering the active support characteristics of grid-forming new energy[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44(2): 80-89.
[27]
林宇轩, 李威, 朱玲, 等. 电网电压跌落下构网型变流器暂态控制策略综述[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(2): 55-68.
Lin Yuxuan, Li Wei, Zhu Ling, et al. Review of transient control strategies for grid-forming converters under grid voltage sag conditions[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44(2): 55-68.
[28]
严干贵, 葛奕麟, 岳霖, 等. 跟网型变流器暂态同步失稳机理分析与稳定性提升策略[J/OL]. 电网技术, 2025-12-02. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2410.TM.20251202.0813.001.
Yan Gangui, Ge Yilin, Yue Lin, et al. Analysis of transient synchronization instability mechanism and study on stability enhancement strategies for grid following converter[J/OL]. Power System Technology, 2025-12-02. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2410.TM.20251202.0813.001.
[29]
NERC. Reliability guideline: bulk power system reliability perspectives on the adoption of IEEE 1547-2018[R]. Atlanta, USA: North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 2023.
[30]
Harnefors L, Bongiorno M, Lundberg S. Input-admittance calculation and shaping for controlled voltage-source converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(6): 3323-3334.
[31]
XU Y, LIU F, MEI S, et al. Analysis of phase-locked loop synchronization stability for grid-connected converters under weak grid conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2021, 36(1): 437-451.
[32]
王辉东, 倪琳娜, 芦鹏飞, 等. 考虑储能动态特性的虚拟电厂多指标融合可靠性评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(1): 33-43.
Wang Huidong, Ni Linna, Lu Pengfei, et al. Multi index fusion reliability evaluation method for virtual power plants considering the dynamic characteristics of energy storage[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(1): 33-43.
[33]
钟伟麟, 徐志豪, 李国庆, 等. 基于广域测量系统的虚拟电厂频率主动支撑方法[J/OL]. 电力自动化设备, 2026-01-13. https://doi.org/10.16081/j.epae.202601005.
Zhong Weilin, Xu Zhihao, Li Guoqing, et al. Frequency initiative support method for virtual power plant based on wide-area measurement system[J/OL]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2026-01-13. https://doi.org/10.16081/j.epae.202601005.
[34]
Ulbig A, Borsche T S, Andersson G. Impact of low rotational inertia on power system stability and operation[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2014, 47(3): 7290-7297.
[35]
Tuo Y, Liu Y, Milano F. Definition and analysis of system frequency response metrics in low-inertia power systems[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2020, 189: 106742.
[36]
逯瑞鹏, 秦文萍, 朱志龙, 等. 基于节点瞬时等效惯量指标的暂态频率稳定可能性评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49(13): 113-127.
Lu Ruipeng, Qin Wenping, Zhu Zhilong, et al. Possibility evaluation of transient frequency stability based on instantaneous equivalent inertia indicators of buses[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49(13): 113-127.
[37]
姜继恒, 鲁宗相, 乔颖, 等. 基于全阶模型的直驱风电机组多时间尺度等效惯量机理建模[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(8): 79-90.
Jiang Jiheng, Lu Zongxiang, Qiao Ying, et al. Multi-time-scale equivalent inertia mechanism modeling of direct-drive wind turbines based on full-order model[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(8): 79-90.
[38]
宋嘉雯, 王琦, 王亚伦, 等. 计及负荷等效惯量的新型电力系统机组组合安全优化方法[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(9): 111-119.
Song Jiawen, Wang Qi, Wang Yalun, et al. Security optimization method for unit commitment in new power systems considering load equivalent inertia[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2025, 46(9): 111-119.
[39]
刘鑫, 吕世轩, 位俊明, 等. 基于时间卷积网络-双向长短期记忆网络的系统等效惯量短期预测方法[J/OL]. 现代电力, 2025-12-01. https://doi.org/10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2025.0015.
Liu Xin, Shixuan, Wei Junming, et al. Short-term prediction method for system equivalent inertia based on temporal convolutional network and bi-directional long short-term memory network[J/OL]. Modern Electric Power, 2025-12-01. https://doi.org/10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2025.0015.
[40]
Guerrero J M, Vasquez J C, Matas J, et al. Hierarchical control of droop-controlled AC and DC microgrids: a general approach toward standardization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011, 58(1): 158-172.
[41]
Song X, Zhang Y, Blaabjerg F. Enhanced droop control for grid-forming inverters with virtual inertia[J]. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2018, 12(15): 1783-1792.
[42]
Beck H, Dörfler F, Andreasson M. Virtual synchronous machines: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 113: 109-124.
[43]
Zhang Y, Li H, Wu B. Improving grid-forming inverter performance via virtual synchronous machine control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(4): 3157-3167.
[44]
Wu B, Yu X, Blaabjerg F. Power oscillation damping in inverter-based microgrids via inertia emulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(3): 2056-2066.
[45]
郭旭存, 任永峰, 张岩, 等. 基于双自适应协同优化的构网型储能主动支撑策略[J]. 高电压技术, 2026, 52(5): 2194-2204.
Guo Xucun, Ren Yongfeng, Zhang Yan, et al. Active support strategy for grid-forming energy storage based on dual adaptive collaborative optimization[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2026, 52(5): 2194-2204.
[46]
首建威, 杨峰雄, 张平, 等. 计及构网型储能的新能源基地暂态无功支撑优化控制[J/OL]. 电力电子技术, 2025-08-29. https://doi.org/10.20222/j.cnki.cn61-1124/tm.20250829.003.
Shou Jianwei, Yang Fengxiong, Zhang Ping, et al. Transient reactive power optimization control of renewable energy base considering grid-forming energy storage station[J/OL]. Power Electronics, 2025-08-29. https://doi.org/10.20222/j.cnki.cn61-1124/tm.20250829.003.
[47]
史梓益, 张晓楠, 田晓康, 等. 基于gSCR-IMR的构网型变流器选址定容方法[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44(10): 69-80.
Shi Ziyi, Zhang Xiaonan, Tian Xiaokang, et al. A siting and sizing method for grid-forming converters based on gSCR and IMR[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44(10): 69-80.
[48]
Tamrakar U, Shrestha D, Maharjan M, et al. Virtual inertia: current trends and future directions[J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(7): 654.
The modern power system is progressing from a synchronous machine-based system towards an inverter-dominated system, with large-scale penetration of renewable energy sources (RESs) like wind and photovoltaics. RES units today represent a major share of the generation, and the traditional approach of integrating them as grid following units can lead to frequency instability. Many researchers have pointed towards using inverters with virtual inertia control algorithms so that they appear as synchronous generators to the grid, maintaining and enhancing system stability. This paper presents a literature review of the current state-of-the-art of virtual inertia implementation techniques, and explores potential research directions and challenges. The major virtual inertia topologies are compared and classified. Through literature review and simulations of some selected topologies it has been shown that similar inertial response can be achieved by relating the parameters of these topologies through time constants and inertia constants, although the exact frequency dynamics may vary slightly. The suitability of a topology depends on system control architecture and desired level of detail in replication of the dynamics of synchronous generators. A discussion on the challenges and research directions points out several research needs, especially for systems level integration of virtual inertia systems.
[49]
Wen Y F, Li W Y, Huang G, et al. Frequency dynamics constrained unit commitment with battery energy storage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(6): 5115-5125.
[50]
Teng F, Strbac G. Assessment of the role and value of frequency response support from wind plants[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(2): 586-595.
[51]
冯燕波, 王姗姗, 吴广禄, 等. 新能源孤岛柔直送出系统耗能电阻优化配置研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(7): 94-102.
Feng Yanbo, Wang Shanshan, Wu Guanglu, et al. Study on optimal configuration of energy-dissipating resistors in VSC-HVDC system for new energy island[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43(7): 94-102.
[52]
冯建洲, 胡泽春. 兼顾电力系统新能源消纳和小干扰稳定支撑的跟网型与构网型储能联合规划[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(10): 4103-4113.
Feng Jianzhou, Hu Zechun. A grid-following and grid-forming energy storage co-planning method for enhancing renewable energy accommodation and small-signal stability of power systems[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(10): 4103-4113.
[53]
张丽娜, 王金梅, 苗海东. 基于DFIG桨距角与虚拟惯量的协调频率控制策略研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026, 47(4): 329-336.
Zhang Lina, Wang Jinmei, Miao Haidong. Research on coordinated frequency control strategy based on DFIG pitch angle and virtual inertia[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2026, 47(4): 329-336.
[54]
刘雨姗, 陈俊儒, 刘牧阳, 等. 兼顾多时间尺度频率-电压支撑与稳定性约束的构网型储能容量优化配置方法[J]. 电网技术, 2026, 50(4): 1463-1472.
Liu Yushan, Chen Junru, Liu Muyang, et al. Optimal capacity configuration of grid-forming energy storage considering multi-timescale frequency-voltage support and stability constraints[J]. Power System Technology, 2026, 50(4): 1463-1472.
[55]
黄冬梅, 余京朋, 崔承刚, 等. 多时间尺度深度强化学习光储配电网电压优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(17): 6709-6723.
Huang Dongmei, Yu Jingpeng, Cui Chenggang, et al. Voltage optimization for PV-ES distribution network with multi-timescale deep reinforcement learning method[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(17): 6709-6723.
[56]
叶帆, 王杰, 黄文焘, 等. 双级式储能虚拟同步机惯量计算模型与方法[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026-01-04. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20260104.1117.005.
Ye Fan, Wang Jie, Huang Wentao, et al. Inertia calculation model and method for two-stage energy storage virtual synchronous generator[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026-01-04. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20260104.1117.005.
[57]
黄颖峰, 王峰, 蔡德胜, 等. 储能电站虚拟惯量控制技术及其应用[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(2): 148-153.
Huang Yingfeng, Wang Feng, Cai Desheng, et al. Virtual inertia control technology and application of energy storage power station[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(2): 148-153.
[58]
Anderson P M, Mirheydar M. A low-order system frequency response model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1990, 5(3): 720-729.
[59]
Shi Q X, Li F X, Cui H T. Analytical method to aggregate multi-machine SFR model with applications in power system dynamic studies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(6): 6355-6367.
[60]
Azizipanah-Abarghooee R, Terzija V, Saadatmand H, et al. Modeling DFIG-based system frequency response for frequency trajectory sensitivity analysis[J]. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2018, 12(9): 1028-1037.
[61]
Xia Y X, Wang Q, Miao C R, et al. An extended SFR model based fast frequency security assessment method for power systems[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 2045-2053.
[62]
文云峰, 赵荣臻, 肖友强, 等. 基于多层极限学习机的电力系统频率安全评估方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(1): 133-140.
Wen Yunfeng, Zhao Rongzhen, Xiao Youqiang, et al. Frequency safety assessment of power system based on multi-layer extreme learning machine[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(1): 133-140.
[63]
皇甫成, 邱婷, 梁吉, 等. 一种考虑电力系统频率安全的新能源并网限值评估方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2021, 37(2): 85-90, 98.
Huangfu Cheng, Qiu Ting, Liang Ji, et al. A sustainable energy penetration limit evaluation method considering power system frequency security[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2021, 37(2): 85-90, 98.
[64]
蔡国伟, 孙正龙, 王雨薇, 等. 基于改进频率响应模型的低频减载方案优化[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(11): 3131-3136.
Cai Guowei, Sun Zhenglong, Wang Yuwei, et al. Optimization of under frequency load shedding scheme based on improved system frequency response model[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(11): 3131-3136.
[65]
郭威, 郑文伟, 文云峰, 等. 考虑非线性环节的双高电力系统频率安全快速评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2026, 46(3): 168-177.
Guo Wei, Zheng Wenwei, Wen Yunfeng, et al. Fast frequency security calculation method for double-high power system considering nonlinear elements[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2026, 46(3): 168-177.
[66]
郑文伟, 文云峰, 李鸿鑫, 等. 考虑惯量和频率安全约束的非同步机电源承载能力评估方法[J/OL]. 电力自动化设备, 2026-01-04. https://doi.org/10.16081/j.epae.202512034.
Zheng Wenwei, Wen Yunfeng, Li Hongxin, et al. Evaluation method of non-synchronous generation hosting capacity considering inertia and frequency security constraints[J/OL]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2026-01-04. https://doi.org/10.16081/j.epae.202512034.
[67]
李东东, 孙雅茹, 徐波, 等. 考虑频率稳定的新能源高渗透率电力系统最小惯量与一次调频容量评估方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(23): 54-61.
Li Dongdong, Sun Yaru, Xu Bo, et al. Minimum inertia and primary frequency capacity assessment for a new energy high permeability power system considering frequency stability[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(23): 54-61.
[68]
张礼浩, 刘翔宇, 顾雪平, 等. 新型电力系统频率安全稳定研究综述及展望[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(10): 12-26.
Zhang Lihao, Liu Xiangyu, Gu Xueping, et al. Review and prospects of frequency security and stability research in new-type power systems[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43(10): 12-26.
[69]
洪晗笑, 吴晨曦, 倪索引. 考虑频率-惯量安全约束的新型电力系统优化调度[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(8): 176-184.
Hong Hanxiao, Wu Chenxi, Ni Suoyin. Optimal scheduling of new-type power system considering frequency-inertia security constraints[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44(8): 176-184.
[70]
周茂一, 黄婷钰, 刘子文, 等. 基于含可变遗忘因子递推最小二乘的电力系统惯量评估方法[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(5): 148-158.
Zhou Maoyi, Huang Tingyu, Liu Ziwen, et al. Evaluation of power system inertia based on recursive least squares with variable forgetting factors[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44(5): 148-158.
[71]
刘方蕾, 胥国毅, 刘家豪, 等. 考虑电网结构和参数的电力系统惯量分布特性[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(23): 60-67.
Liu Fanglei, Xu Guoyi, Liu Jiahao, et al. Inertia distribution characteristics of power system considering structure and parameters of power grid[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(23): 60-67.
[72]
李晓栋, 徐政, 张哲任. 含非同步机电源交流电网暂态稳定性的电磁暂态仿真研究[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(9): 57-68.
Li Xiaodong, Xu Zheng, Zhang Zheren. Electromagnetic transient simulation study on transient stability of AC power grid with non-synchronous machine sources[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(9): 57-68.
[73]
贺杨烊, 郑晓冬, 邰能灵, 等. 交直流混联电网LCC-HVDC换流器建模方法综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(11): 3119-3129.
He Yangyang, Zheng Xiaodong, Tai Nengling, et al. A review of modeling methods for LCC-HVDC converter in AC/DC hybrid power grid[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(11): 3119-3129.
[74]
樊鑫, 郭春义, 杜夏冰, 等. 特高压混合级联直流输电系统抑制逆变站后续换相失败的无功功率调控方法[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(9): 3443-3452.
Fan Xin, Guo Chunyi, Du Xiabing, et al. Reactive power coordinated control approach for suppressing subsequent commutation failure of inverter station in hybrid cascaded UHVDC system[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(9): 3443-3452.
[75]
陈义宣, 王国腾, 李玲芳, 等. 计及安全稳定约束的多直流送出电网新能源极限渗透率估计方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43(9): 236-242.
Chen Yixuan, Wang Guoteng, Li Lingfang, et al. Estimation method of maximum renewable energy penetration rate for multi-send HVDC system considering security and stability constraints[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43(9): 236-242.
[76]
ENTSO-E. Frequency stability evaluation criteria for the synchronous zone of continental Europe[R]. Brussels: ENTSO-E, 2016.
[77]
Kayikci M, Milanovic J V. Dynamic contribution of DFIG-based wind plants to system frequency disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(2): 859-867.
[78]
Schiffer J, Aristidou P, Ortega R. Online estimation of power system inertia using dynamic regressor extension and mixing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(6): 4993-5001.
[79]
Ali Abooshahab M, Hovd M, Bitmead R R. Disturbance and state estimation in partially known power networks[C]// 2019 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA). IEEE, 2019: 98-105.
[80]
Wall P, Terzija V. Simultaneous estimation of the time of disturbance and inertia in power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2014, 29(4): 2018-2031.
[81]
Panda R K, Mohapatra A, Srivastava S C, et al. Energy function based approach for online inertia estimation utilizing synchrophasor measurements[C]// 2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC). IEEE, 2020: 1-6.
[82]
Panda R K, Mohapatra A, Srivastava S C. Online estimation of system inertia in a power network utilizing synchrophasor measurements[C]// 2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2021: 01.
[83]
Cao X, Stephen B, Abdulhadi I F, et al. Switching Markov Gaussian models for dynamic power system inertia estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(5): 3394-3403.
[84]
Best R J, Brogan P V, Morrow D J. Power system inertia estimation using HVDC power perturbations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021, 36(3): 1890-1899.
[85]
Hernandez M A J, Pinto R T. Artificial neural network-based inertia estimation[C]// 2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2022: 1-5.
[86]
Zhu L, Farantatos E, Ramasubramanian D, et al. Ambient PMU measurements based online regional inertia estimation and monitoring[C]// 2024 International Conference on Smart Grid Synchronized Measurements and Analytics (SGSMA). IEEE, 2024: 1-5.
[87]
Sanchez A, Ramirez J M, Paternina M R A, et al. Synchronous machines’ inertia estimation through PMU data-driven[C]// 2023 North American Power Symposium (NAPS). IEEE, 2023: 1-7.
[88]
Ye H B, Chen X M, Cui Y, et al. Generator available inertia estimation based on various disturbance measurements of PMU[C]// 2021 22nd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT). IEEE, 2021: 605-610.
[89]
Alshahrestani A, Golshan M E H, Alhelou H H. WAMS based online estimation of total inertia constant and damping coefficient for future smart grid systems[C]// 2018 Smart Grid Conference (SGC). IEEE, 2018: 1-5.
[90]
Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S, Rachuri S. Performance evaluation of a manufacturing process under uncertainty using Bayesian networks[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 113: 947-959.
[91]
Ebrahimi A, Daemi T. A novel method for constructing the Bayesian network for detailed reliability assessment of power systems[C]// 2009 International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems, (EPECS). IEEE, 2009: 1-6.
[92]
Huo L M, Zhu Y L, Fan G F. Reliability assessment of power systems by Bayesian networks[C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Power System Technology. IEEE, 2002: 876-879.
[93]
Huang L H, Hou C W, Wang H, et al. Assessment of distribution system reliability based on Bayesian network and time sequence simulation[C]// 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. IEEE, 2009: 481-486.
[94]
Wang X T, Liu R P, Wang X Z, et al. A comparative study of polynomial chaos expansion-based methods for global sensitivity analysis in power system uncertainty control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2024, 71(1): 216-220.
[95]
王强强, 姚良忠, 徐箭, 等. 基于切片采样-马尔科夫链蒙特卡洛模拟的高比例新能源电力系统等效惯量概率评估[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(1): 140-149.
Wang Qiangqiang, Yao Liangzhong, Xu Jian, et al. S-MCMC based equivalent inertia probability evaluation for power systems with high proportional renewable energy[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48(1): 140-149.
[96]
Xie J, Alvarez-Fernandez I, Sun W. A review of machine learning applications in power system resilience[C]// 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2020: 1-5.
[97]
Yan R, Geng G C, Jiang Q Y, et al. Fast transient stability batch assessment using cascaded convolutional neural networks[C]// 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2020: 1.
[98]
Samek W, Wiegand T, Müller K R. Explainable artificial intelligence: understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models[J]. ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, 2017, 1(1): 1-10.
[99]
Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707.
We introduce physics-informed neural networks - neural networks that are trained to solve supervised learning tasks while respecting any given laws of physics described by general nonlinear partial differential equations. In this work, we present our developments in the context of solving two main classes of problems: data-driven solution and data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. Depending on the nature and arrangement of the available data, we devise two distinct types of algorithms, namely continuous time and discrete time models. The first type of models forms a new family of data-efficient spatio-temporal function approximators, while the latter type allows the use of arbitrarily accurate implicit Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes with unlimited number of stages. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a collection of classical problems in fluids, quantum mechanics, reaction-diffusion systems, and the propagation of nonlinear shallow-water waves. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc.
[100]
Huang Z, Wang J, Chen Y, et al. Physics-informed machine learning for power systems: a review[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2023, 9(2): 308-325.
[101]
Zhou Y Z, Zhao W L, Guo Q L, et al. Transient stability assessment of power systems using cost-sensitive deep learning approach[C]// 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2). IEEE, 2018: 1-6.
[102]
杨珺, 侯俊浩, 刘亚威, 等. 分布式协同控制方法及在电力系统中的应用综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(19): 4035-4049.
Yang Jun, Hou Junhao, Liu Yawei, et al. Distributed cooperative control method and application in power system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(19): 4035-4049.
[103]
徐波, 俞向栋, 杨逸欣, 等. 基于多智能体系统的分布式风储协同频率控制策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(19): 13-24.
Xu Bo, Yu Xiangdong, Yang Yixin, et al. Distributed wind-storage coordinate frequency control strategy based on a multi-agent system[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(19): 13-24.
[104]
边家瑜, 周专, 于志勇, 等. 高比例新能源电力系统下基于多尺度的构网型储能配置优化研究[J]. 可再生能源, 2025, 43(6): 839-845.
Bian Jiayu, Zhou Zhuan, Yu Zhiyong, et al. Research on the multi-scale configuration optimization for the grid-forming energy storage during high penetration of renewable energy in power system[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2025, 43(6): 839-845.
[105]
张勇军, 蒋崇颖, 唐文虎, 等. 分布式孤岛电网构网型储能控制与运行研究综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2026, 50(10): 1-15.
Zhang Yongjun, Jiang Chongying, Tang Wenhu, et al. Review of grid-forming energy storage control and operation research in distributed islanded grids[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2026, 50(10): 1-15.
[106]
Muñoz M A, Pineda S, Morales J M. A bilevel framework for decision-making under uncertainty with contextual information[J]. Omega, 2022, 108: 102575.
[107]
Zheng Z, Tang R, Luo X W, et al. A distributed coordination strategy for heterogeneous building flexible thermal loads in responding to smart grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2024, 15(2): 1620-1633.
[108]
Li J, Ye Y J, Papadaskalopoulos D, et al. Distributed consensus-based coordination of flexible demand and energy storage resources[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021, 36(4): 3053-3069.
[109]
Lei J X, Yang R Z, Wu W X, et al. Coordinated control strategy for HVDC frequency controllers in multi-area asynchronous grid[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2025, 167: 110577.
[110]
Jiang S Q, Du Y L, Li G Q, et al. Coordinated control strategy for improving frequency security of LCC HVDC sending-end system with large-scale wind power[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2025, 239: 111287.
[111]
Wei P, Chai B, Shi L, et al. RPC-based frequency control strategy of LCC-HVDC sending end power system with renewable energy[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, 10(10):1037825.
Long-distance transmission of renewable energy via DC is currently a more economical transmission scheme. As the proportion of renewable energy at the generation end continues to rise, the inertia and damping level of the system is reduced, causing serious frequency-related issues. This paper first analyzes the working principle and control method of the LCC-HVDC system, summarizes the frequency control methods of the sending end power grid and their existing problems, and proposes a frequency control scheme for the LCC-HVDC sending end system based on the concept of rapid power compensation (RPC). Finally, the LCC-HVDC system model integrated with the large-capacity wind farm and thermal power plant is built in MATLAB/Simulink. Under conditions of load power fluctuation and sudden wind speed change, the proposed strategy fully utilizes the spare capacity of the system, effectively improves the frequency indexes of the system, and improves the frequency characteristics of the renewable energy sending end grid.
[112]
Yan K F, Li G Q, Zhang R F, et al. Frequency control and optimal operation of low-inertia power systems with HVDC and renewable energy: a review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2024, 39(2): 4279-4295.
[113]
Li H, Li Y K, Meng Y, et al. Coordinated frequency support strategy for VSC-HVDC integrated offshore wind farm system[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024, 12: 1351353.
The large-scale offshore wind power integrated into the onshore power grid through voltage source converter-based high voltage direct current (VSC-HVDC) system is unable to provide inertia response and frequency support to the onshore power grid. To improve the frequency characteristics of the receiving-end power grid, a coordinated frequency control strategy combining VSC-HVDC and offshore wind power is proposed. The onshore converter adopts virtual inertia control, which uses DC capacitors to absorb or release energy for inertia support after the receiving-end grid is disturbed. Wind-farm-side VSC (WFVSC) obtains the frequency signal of the receiving-end power grid by detecting the local DC voltage. The offshore wind farm (OWF) transfers the frequency deviation into an additional power signal and sends it to the power controller to adjust the output, thereby performing inertia and primary frequency response. In addition, a secondary frequency regulation strategy for wind farms has been designed to achieve non-difference frequency regulation of the receiving-end power grid. Finally, a simulation model of VSC-HVDC integrated OWF system is constructed to demonstrate the proposed coordinated frequency control strategy for VSC-HVDC and OWF. The results indicate that the proposed control strategy can effectively enhance the frequency support capability of the receiving-end power grid.
[114]
谭珺敉, 彭晓涛, 李旭涛, 等. 基于协同控制优化风电-柔直并网惯性响应策略研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(5): 1355-1367.
Tan Junmi, Peng Xiaotao, Li Xutao, et al. Optimization of inertia response strategy based on synergetic control for wind power integrating to power grid via VSC-HVDC[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(5): 1355-1367.
[115]
Saleh A M, Vokony I, Waseem M, et al. Power system stability with high integration of RESs and EVs: benefits, challenges, tools, and solutions[J]. Energy Reports, 2025, 13: 2637-2663.
[116]
Shi Y, Tuan H D, Savkin A V, et al. Distributed model predictive control for joint coordination of demand response and optimal power flow with renewables in smart grid[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 290: 116701.

利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests)

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

作者贡献声明(Authors' Contributions)

沈赋、束洪春、曹旸进行了研究设计;魏子玉、王健参与了论文写作;华昊辰、单节杉参与了论文修订。所有作者均阅读并同意了论文终稿内容。

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(62563016)
云南省应用基础研究计划项目(202501AS070456)
云南省应用基础研究计划项目(202201AU070111)
云南省兴滇英才支持计划项目(KKRD202204021)
昆明理工大学高层次人才平台建设项目(KKZ7202004004)

编辑: 景贺峰
PDF(1752 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

相关文章
AI小编
你好!我是《电力建设》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?

/