含高渗透率间歇性电源的电力网络规划评价体系初探

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2015.10.022

电力建设 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 144-153.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2015.10.022

含高渗透率间歇性电源的电力网络规划评价体系初探　

黄裕春1,2, 文福拴1,3, 杨甲甲1, 刘卫东4, 俞敏4, 曾平良5

1. 浙江大学电气工程学院,杭州市 310027；2. 广州供电局有限公司,广州市 510310； 3. 文莱科技大学电机与电子工程系, 斯里巴加湾市 BE1410；4. 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院,杭州市 310008；5. 中国电力科学研究院, 北京市 100192

出版日期:2015-10-01
作者简介:黄裕春（1987）, 女, 硕士, 主要从事电力系统可靠性评估、新能源并网规划方面的研究；文福拴（1965）, 男, 通信作者, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事电力系统故障诊断与系统恢复、电力经济与电力市场、智能电网与电动汽车等方面的研究工作；杨甲甲（1989）, 男, 硕士, 主要从事新能源参与电力市场、计及新能源接入影响的电力系统规划方面的研究；刘卫东（1975）, 男, 博士研究生, 高级工程师, 主要从事电网规划和技术经济研究；俞敏（1968）, 女, 高级工程师, 造价工程师, 主要从事电网工程技术经济研究；曾平良（1962）, 男, 博士, 国家“千人计划”专家, 主要从事电力系统分析与规划、新能源和电动汽车接入、电力系统可靠性方面研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51477151, 51361130152）；国网浙江省电力公司科技项目（5211DS14000X）。

A Preliminary Investigation on Power Network Planning Evaluation System with High-Penetration Intermittent Generation

HUANG Yuchun1,2, WEN Fushuan1,3, YANG Jiajia1, LIU Weidong4, YU Min4, ZENG Pingliang5

1. School of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China；2. Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510310, China；3. Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Institut Teknologi Brunei, Bandar Seri Begawan BE1410, Brunei；4. State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Corporation Economic Research institute, Hangzhou 310008, China；5. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China

Online:2015-10-01
Supported by:
Project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China （51477151, 51361130152）；State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Corporation Project （5211DS14000X）.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

首先概述了在风电和光电方面发展比较领先的国家在电力系统规划评价方面已取得的成果和经验。然后, 分析了高渗透率间歇性电源并网与电力网络规划之间的相互影响, 并在此基础上对含高渗透率间歇性电源的电力网络规划综合评价指标体系做了初步探索。以传统指标体系为基础,引入了风险评估、接纳间歇性电源最大能力、输电能力、间歇性电源可置信容量及污染物减排量等指标, 来评估间歇性可再生能源规模化并网后的网络规划方案的经济性、供电质量、灵活性、环保性等。最后, 针对巴西南部46节点系统的2个备选网络规划方案对所提评价指标体系做了说明。分析结果表明,间歇性电源接入电力系统的适应程度对电力系统接纳间歇性电源的能力和运行风险具有重要影响, 因此在确定电力网络规划方案时需要在经济性与对间歇性电源并网的适应性方面适当折衷。

关键词: 间歇性可再生电源, 高渗透率, 电力网络规划, 综合评价, 指标体系

Abstract:

This paper firstly summarized the achievements and experiences of power system planning evaluation in countries with leading development in wind power and photovoltaic power. Then, the interactions between grid-connected intermittent generations（IGs） with high penetration and power network planning were analyzed, and on this basis, the comprehensive evaluation index system of power network planning was preliminarily studied, which could characterize large-scale IGs after grid-connected. Based on traditional index system, some indicators such as the risk assessment, the maximum integration capacity of IGs, the transmission capability, the credible capacity of IGs, and the pollutants emission reduction, were used to evaluate the power network planning schemes of IGs after large-scale grid-connected from aspects of economics, power supply quality, flexibility, environmental friendliness, etc. Finally, two alternative power network planning schemes in southern Brazil 46-node system were applied to demonstrate the proposed evaluation index system. The analysis results show that the adaptability degree of IGs integrations into a power system has significant impact on the IGs accommodation capability and operation risk of the power system. Therefore, during determining power network planning scheme, it is necessary to make a compromise between the economics and adaptability of grid-connected IGs.

Key words: intermittent renewable generation, high penetration, power network planning, comprehensive evaluation, index system

中图分类号:

TM 715

黄裕春，文福拴, 杨甲甲, 刘卫东, 俞敏, 曾平良. 含高渗透率间歇性电源的电力网络规划评价体系初探　[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(10): 144-153.

HUANG Yuchun, WEN Fushuan, YANG Jiajia, LIU Weidong, YU Min, ZENG Pingliang. A Preliminary Investigation on Power Network Planning Evaluation System with High-Penetration Intermittent Generation[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 36(10): 144-153.

参考文献

［1］Ren21 R. Global status report［J］. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, Paris, France, 2010.
［2］杨海涛, 吴国旸, 陈西颖, 等. 用于间歇性电源高渗透电网规划的安全性评估方法［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36（24）: 15-20.
Yang Haitao, Wu Guoyang, Chen Xiying, et al. A security assessment method for power grid planning under high penetration of variable generation［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36（24）: 15-20.
［3］Morales J M, Conejo A J, Pérez-ruiz J. Economic valuation of reserves in power systems with high penetration of wind power［J］. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 2009, 24（2）: 900-910.
［4］Jangamshetti S H, Rau V G. Optimum sitting of wind turbine generators［J］. IEEE Transaction on Energy Conservation, 2001, 16（1）: 8-13.
［5］North American Electric Reliability Corporation （NERC）. Accommodating high levels of available generation［R］. 2008. Available at www.nerc.com.
［6］European Wind Energy Association. Integrating wind-developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power［R］. Available at http://www.trade-wind.eu.
［7］Australian Energy Market Commission. National transmission planning arrangements （final report to MCE）［R］. 2008.
［8］谭伟, 何光宇, 刘锋, 等. 智能电网低碳指标体系初探［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2010, 34（17）: 1-5.
Tan Wei, He Guangyu, Liu Feng, et al. A preliminary investigation on smart grids low-carbon index system［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34（17）: 1-5.
［9］王深哲, 高山, 李海峰, 等. 含高渗透率间歇性电源的电网规划方案优选方法［J］. 电网技术, 2013, 37（8）: 2129-2135.
Wang Shenzhe, Gao Shan, Li Haifeng, et al. Optimal selection of planning schemes for power grid with high penetration of intermittent generation［J］. Power System Technology, 2013, 37（8）: 2129-2135.
［10］North American Electric Reliability Corporation （NERC）. Flexibility requirements and potential metrics for variable generation: implications for system planning studies, 2010. Available at www.nerc.com.
［11］Massachusetts Institute of Technology （MIT）. The future of the electric grid（2011）［R］. Available at http://web.mit.edu/mitei/research/studies/the-electric-grid-2011.shtml.
［12］North American Electric Reliability Corporation （NERC）. Potential bulk system reliability impacts of distributed resources（2011）［R］. Available at www.nerc.com.
［13］黄平, 李晖, 李隽. 国外电网规划的侧重点比较和启示［J］. 电力技术经济, 2009, 21（3）: 38-42.
Huang Ping, Li Hui, Li Jun. Comparison and revelations of power grid planning outside China［J］. Electric Power Technologic Economics, 2009, 21（3）: 38-42.
［14］Clean Energy Council （Australia）. Clean energy Australia report（2011）［R］. Available at http://www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/cec/resourcecentre/reports/cleanenergyaustralia.
［15］国家电力监管委员会. 重点区域风电消纳监管报告［R］.北京：国家电力监管委员会，2012.
［16］韩丰, 李晖, 王智冬, 等. 法国电网发展分析以及对我国的启示［J］. 电网技术, 2009, 33（8）: 41-47.
Han Feng, Li Hui, Wang Zhidong, et al. Development course and planning method of French power grid and its enlightenment for us［J］. Power System Technology, 2009, 33（8）: 41-47.
［17］万卫, 王淳, 程虹, 等. 电网评价指标体系的初步框架［J］. 电力系统保护与控制, 2008, 36（24）:14-18.
Wan Wei, Wang Chun, Cheng Hong, et al. Preliminary frame of index system for evaluating power network［J］. Power System Protection and Control, 2008, 36（24）:14-18.
［18］甘德强, 杨莉, 冯冬涵. 电力经济与电力市场［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2010.
［19］王壬, 尚金成, 冯肠, 等. 基于CVaR风险计量指标的发电商投标组合策略及模型［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2005, 29（14）: 5-9.
Wang Ren, Shang Jincheng, Feng Yang, et al. Combined bidding strategy and model for power suppliers based on CVaR risk measurement techniques［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2005, 29（14）: 5-9.
［20］邱菀华. 管理决策与应用熵学［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2002.
［21］郭永基. 电力系统可靠性分析［M］. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003.
［22］Lannoye E, Flynn D, Omalley M. Evaluation of power system flexibility［J］. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 2012, 27（2）: 922-931.
［23］孙荣富, 张涛, 梁吉. 电网接纳风电能力的评估及应用［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35（4）: 70-76.
Sun Rongfu, Zhang Tao, Liang Ji. Evaluation and application of wind power integration capacity in power grid［J］.　Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35（4）: 70-76.
［24］韩小琪, 孙寿广, 戚庆茹. 从系统调峰角度评估电网接纳风电能力［J］. 中国电力, 2010, 43（6）: 16-19.
Han Xiaoqi, Sun Shouguang, Qi Qingru. Evaluation of wind power penetration limit from peak regulation［J］. Electric Power, 2010, 43（6）: 16-19.
［25］王芝茗, 苏安龙, 鲁顺. 基于电力平衡的辽宁电网接纳风电能力分析［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2010, 34（3）: 86-90.
Wang Zhiming, Su Anlong, Lu Shun. Analysis on capacity of wind power integrated into Liaoning power grid based on power balance［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34（3）: 86-90.
［26］Lannoye E, Flynn D, Omalley M. Evaluation of power system flexibility［J］. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 2012, 27（2）: 922-931.
［27］肖定垚, 王承民, 曾平良, 等. 电力系统灵活性及其评价综述［J］. 电网技术, 2014, 38（6）: 1569-1576.
Xiao Dingyao, Wang Chengmin, Zeng Pingliang, et al. A survey on power system flexibility and its evaluation［J］. Power System Technology, 2014, 38（6）: 1569-1576.
［28］梁双, 胡学浩, 张东霞, 等. 光伏发电置信容量的研究现状与发展趋势［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35（19）: 101-107.
Liang Shuang, Hu Xuehao, Zhang Dongxia, et al. Current status and development trend on capacity credit of photovoltaic generation［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35（19）: 101-107.
［29］郑静, 文福拴, 李力, 等. 计及风险控制策略的含风电机组的输电系统规划［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35（22）: 71-76.
Zheng Jing, Wen Fushuan, Li Li, et al. Transmission system planning with risk-control strategies for power systems with wind generators［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35（22）: 71-76.
［30］国家电力监管委员会电力可靠性管理中心. 2011年全国电力可靠性指标（发电:第二部分）［Z］. 2011.

[1]	艾欣，杨子豪，胡寰宇，王智冬，彭冬，赵朗. 基于改进k-means算法的VPP负荷曲线聚类方法及应用[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(5): 28-36.
[2]	陈垚煜，江全元，周自强，王朝亮，许烽. 考虑典型场景的配电网调控方案灵活性评估方法[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(7): 34-40.
[3]	齐世雄，王秀丽，张炜，吴雄，王高琴，史新红. 基于博弈论和改进PageRank的电力市场出清方式评价方法[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(5): 107-117.
[4]	黄伟，郭兆蕊，华亮亮. 多主体利益协调的区域综合能源系统综合评价[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(4): 81-89.
[5]	王晞，叶希，唐权，张玉鸿，李婷，刘万宇，李华强. 基于广义灵活性指标体系的输电网扩展规划[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(3): 67-76.
[6]	陈元峰1，徐箭1，范传光2，王辉2，杨俊2，陈习伟2，唐畅2. 基于电解铝负荷调节的含高渗透率风电孤立电网频率控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(3): 92-.
[7]	李媛，张志强，郑超，任建文，李晓珺，吕盼，宋新甫. 考虑光伏电站高渗透接入的火电机组一次调频参数优化[J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(3): 115-.
[8]	董雷，明捷，于汀，卫泽晨，蒲天骄，黄仁乐. 分布式电源高渗透率交直流主动配电网运行控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(5): 57-62.
[9]	尹忠东，冯寅，闫凤琴，蒋利民. 交直流混合配电网能效综合评价方法[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(5): 100-108.
[10]	王凯军，孙飞飞，兰洲，孙可. 全寿命周期成本管理在实际电力网络规划中的应用[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(4): 43-49.
[11]	武泽辰，王秀丽，肖云鹏，刘威，邹蕴韬，杜超，陈欣琰. 电力市场价格效应分析与国民经济关联预警平台开发[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(3): 2-7.
[12]	田方媛，郭勇，梁博淼，文福拴. 综合评估县域配电系统投资与发展状况的新方法[J]. 电力建设, 2016, 37(1): 1-8.
[13]	韩泽文，苏永清，岳继光，张鲲鹏. 电网脆弱性综合指标建立与评估[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(8): 89-94.
[14]	贾乐刚，杨军. 基于AHP-熵权法的电动汽车充电站运行能效评估[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(7): 209-215.
[15]	牛新生，田鑫，朱秀波，赵光锋，董晓明，孙彦龙. 山东电网低碳发展水平综合评价[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(2): 141-148.

含高渗透率间歇性电源的电力网络规划评价体系初探

A Preliminary Investigation on Power Network Planning Evaluation System with High-Penetration Intermittent Generation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价