基于改进Pareto最优算法的海上风电场多目标微观选址规划

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000－7229.2017.04.014

电力建设 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 103-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000－7229.2017.04.014

基于改进Pareto最优算法的海上风电场多目标微观选址规划

谭茂强1，黄伟2，车文学2，闫彬禹2，谭任深1

1.中国能源建设集团广东省电力设计研究院，广州市 510663；

2.华北电力大学电气与电子工程学院，北京市 102206

出版日期:2017-04-01
作者简介:谭茂强（1957），男，教授级高级工程师，主要研究方向为火电、核电、变电及换流站电气设计，近年来重点关注新能源并网研究；黄伟（1962），男，博士，教授，主要研究方向为电力系统运行与规划、微网控制、新能源并网；车文学（1991），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为新能源并网规划；闫彬禹（1992），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为电力系统分析，新能源并网；谭任深（1988），男，工程师，主要研究方向为风力发电、微电网运行。
基金资助:

Improved Pareto Optimality Based on Multi-Objective Micro-Siting Planning of Offshore Wind Farm

TAN Maoqiang1, HUANG Wei2, CHE Wenxue2, YAN Binyu2, TAN Renshen1

1.China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. Guangzhou 510663, China;

2.School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Online:2017-04-01
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 摘要：〖JP2〗为了在海上风电场初步规划时可以兼顾考虑风机尾流影响、集电系统的经济性和可靠性，用风机层数表征集电系统可靠性，以风电场尾流折减系数、海缆投资、风机层数为优化目标，建立海上风电场多目标微观选址规划模型，并通过改进Pareto多目标优化算法求解最优解集，最后应用层次分析法进行最终优化决策。以某海上风电场的风资源分布状况为实例，验证了风机尾流、连接海缆及风机层数之间的相互制约关系，在规划时应予以综合考虑，同时证明了模型和方法的可行性，改进Pareto最优算法可以求出均匀分布的备选方案，层次分析法可以根据不同要求选择出对应的最优方案。

关键词: , , 海上风电场, 微观选址, Pareto最优, 集电系统

Abstract: To take the wind turbines wake effect, the economy and reliability of the collector system into account when starting to plan an offshore wind farm, the reliability of the collector system should be characterized by the number of wind

Turbine’s layers. With the wind turbine wake loss coefficient, the cost of submarine cables, and the number of wind turbine’s layers as the optimization targets, this paper establishes the multi-objective micro-siting planning model of the offshore wind farm, and obtains the optimal solution set through improved Pareto multi-objective optimization algorithm, finally makes the final optimization decision by analytic hierarchy process. Taking the distribution of wind resources in an offshore wind farm as an example, it verifies the mutual restraint relationship between the wind turbine wake loss, the connection submarine cables and the number of wind turbines layers, which should be taken into account in the planning progress. And the feasibility of the model and method is proved, evenly distributed alternative scheme can be obtained by improved Pareto optimization algorithm, analytic hierarchy process can choose the best plan based on the different requirements.

Key words: , offshore wind farm, micro-siting, Pareto optimality, collection system

中图分类号:

TM 614

谭茂强，黄伟，车文学，闫彬禹，谭任深. 基于改进Pareto最优算法的海上风电场多目标微观选址规划[J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(4): 103-.

TAN Maoqiang, HUANG Wei, CHE Wenxue, YAN Binyu, TAN Renshen. Improved Pareto Optimality Based on Multi-Objective Micro-Siting Planning of Offshore Wind Farm

[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2017, 38(4): 103-.

参考文献

［1］徐乾耀, 康重庆, 张宁, 等. 海上风电出力特性及其消纳问题探讨［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35（22）: 54-59.

XU Qianyao, KANG Chongqing, ZHANG Ning, et al. A discussion on offshore wind power output characteristics and its accommodation［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35（22）: 54-59.

［2］王锡凡, 王碧阳, 王秀丽, 等. 面向低碳的海上风电系统优化规划研究［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2014, 38（17）: 4-13, 19.

WANG Xifan, WANG Biyang, WANG Xiuli, et al. Study of optimal planning methods for offshore wind power systems oriented low-carbon［J］. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2014, 38（17）: 4-13, 19.

［3］刘林, 葛旭波, 张义斌, 等. 我国海上风电发展现状及分析［J］. 能源技术经济, 2012, 24（3）: 66-72.

LIU Lin, GE Xubo, ZHANG Yibin, et al. Analysis on status quo of China’s offshore wind power development［J］. Energy Technology and Economics, 2012, 24（3）: 66-72.

［4］WANG Z X, JIANG C W, AI Q, et al. The key technology of offshore wind farm and its new development in China［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13（1）: 216-222.

［5］GONZALE J S, PAYAN M B, SANTOS J M R, et al. A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30: 133-144.

［6］GRADY S A, HUSSAINI M Y, ABDULLAH M M. Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms［J］. Renewable energy, 2005, 30（2）: 259-270.

［7］许昌, 杨建川, 李辰奇, 等. 复杂地形风电场微观选址优化［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33（31）: 58-64.

XU Chang, YANG Jianchuan, LI Chenqi, et al. Optimization of wind farm layout in complex terrain ［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33（31）: 58-64.

［8］严彦, 许昌, 刘德友, 等. 基于遗传算法的风电场微观选址优化研究［J］. 太阳能学报, 2013, 34（3）: 526-532.

YAN Yan, XU Chang, LIU Deyou, et al. Optimization research of wind farm micro sitting based on genetic algorithm［J］. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2013, 34（3）: 526-532.

［9］QUINONEZ-VARELA G, AULT G W, ANAYA-LARA O, et al. Electrical collector system options for large offshore wind farms［J］. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2007, 1（2）: 107-114.

［10］ACKERMANN T. Transmission system for offshore wind farms［J］. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 2002, 22（12）:23-27.

［11］符杨, 吴靖, 魏书荣. 大型海上风电场集电系统拓扑结构优化与规划［J］. 电网技术, 2013, 37（9）: 2553-2558.

FU Yang, WU Jing, WEI Shurong. Topology optimization and planning of power collection system for large-scale offshore wind farm［J］. Power System Technology, 2013, 37（9）: 2553-2558.

［12］黄玲玲, 符杨, 郭晓明. 海上风电场集电系统可靠性评估［J］. 电网技术, 2010, 34（7）: 169-174.

HUANG Lingling, FU Yang, GUO Xiaoming. Reliability evaluation of wind power collection system for offshore wind farm［J］. Power System Technology, 2010, 34（7）: 169-174.

［13］WU Y, LEE C, CHEN C, et al. Optimization of the wind turbine layout and transmission system planning for a large-scale offshore wind farm by AI technology［J］. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2014, 50（3）: 2071-2080.

［14］王一, 程浩忠. 计及输电阻塞的帕累托最优多目标电网规划［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28（13）: 132-138.

WANG Yi, CHENG Haozhong. Pareto optimality based multi-objective transmission planning considering transmission congestion［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28（13）: 132-138.

［15］盛四清, 范林涛, 李兴, 等. 基于帕累托最优的配电网多目标规划［J］. 电力系统自动化, 2014, 38（15）: 51-57.

SHENG Siqing, FAN Lintao, LI Xing, et al. Multi-objective planning of distribution network based on Pareto optimality［J］. Automation of Electric Power Sytems, 2014, 38（15）: 51-57.

[1]	汤吉鸿, 章德, 丛凡超, 田国梁, 吴贵烘, 李宇骏, 禹海峰. 基于线性二次型最优控制的多端直流最优功率调制方案[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(8): 32-39.
[2]	赵洱岽, 王浩, 林弘杨. 现货市场中基于演化博弈的火电企业阶梯报价策略[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(8): 68-71.
[3]	宋建，束洪春，董俊，梁雨婷，李雨龙，杨博. 基于GM(1，1)与BP神经网络的综合负荷预测[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(5): 75-80.
[4]	祁兵，叶欣，李彬，陈宋宋，李源非，石坤. 考虑IEC标准的用户侧电力物联网体系架构研究[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(5): 92-99.
[5]	钟永洁，谢东亮，孙永辉，翟苏巍，常福刚，张明理. 考虑能源子系统与储能的综合能源系统优化分析[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(8): 59-68.
[6]	杨军，林洋佳，陈杰军，李逸欣，詹祥澎. 未来城市共享电动汽车发展模式[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(4): 49-59.
[7]	江帆，杨洪耕. 基于选择性贝叶斯分类的非侵入式负荷识别方法[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(2): 94-.
[8]	刘中原，王维庆，王海云，袁成玉，王亮，李永钦，丁文彬. 基于VSG技术的VSC-HVDC输电系统受端换流器控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(2): 100-.
[9]	林伟芳，易俊，贾俊川，王安斯，余芳芳，方诗卉. 故障后半波长输电线路的稳态过电压控制措施[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(2): 109-.
[10]	崔树银，陆奕，常啸. 考虑信用评分机制的电力碳排放交易区块链模型[J]. 电力建设, 2019, 40(1): 104-111.
[11]	黄裕春，王宏，王珂，文福拴. 考虑电动汽车充电设施接入的居民配电系统供电容量最优规划[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(6): 1-.
[12]	常巩, 邓友均, 杨洪明, 文福拴, 赖明勇. 充换电站模式下电动汽车参与物流配送的电能补给方式规划[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(6): 7-.
[13]	刘洵源, 齐峰, 文福拴, 冯昌森, 王蕾，邹波，张西竹. 光伏不平衡接入的配电系统中电动汽车有序充电策略[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(6): 21-.
[14]	杨文涛, 王蕾, 邹波, 张西竹, 文福拴, 程敏 . 基于大数据服务平台的电动汽车有序充放电管理[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(6): 28-.
[15]	郑涛，张滋行. 基于半桥子模块的模块化多电平换流器内部故障诊断及对策[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(6): 42-.

基于改进Pareto最优算法的海上风电场多目标微观选址规划

Improved Pareto Optimality Based on Multi-Objective Micro-Siting Planning of Offshore Wind Farm

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价