PDF(792 KB)
PDF(792 KB)
PDF(792 KB)
基于层次分析法的带电跨越方式选择
Live-Wire Crossing Method Selection Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
在进行带电跨越施工时,选择合适的方式很关键。围绕着带电跨越方式选择这一核心问题,对层次分析法中1—9标度法、10/10—18/2标度法和9/9—9/1标度法这3种标度法进行比较,计算结果表明10/10—18/2标度法较优。基于改进的层次分析法,构造了选择带电跨越方式的层次分析结构模型,并以某条线路施工为例,对3种带电跨越方式进行综合评估和计算,计算结果表明,该条线路施工中最优的带电跨越方式为索道跨越。
It is crucial to choose the appropriate way in live-wire crossing construction. Closely centered on the issue of live-wire crossing method selection, three scale methods of 1-9, 10/10-18/2 and 9/9-9/1 in analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are compared, whose results showed that the scale method of 10/10-18/2 is better. Based on the improved AHP, the hierarchy model for live-wire crossing method was constructed. Finally, three live-wire crossing methods were comprehensive evaluated and calculated by taking a power transmission line construction as an example, which showed that the cableway crossing is the best.
层次分析法(AHP) / 标度法 / 带电跨越 / 索道跨越 / 权重
analytic hierarchy process (AHP) / scale method / live-wire crossing / cableway crossing / weight
[1]陈曦鸣. 几种不停电跨越施工方案比较[J]. 安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报, 2007(3):36-41.
AI小编
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |