SCR脱硝系统烟气中SO3测试采样方法对比研究

郭阳,李媛,汪永威,李东梅

电力建设 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 69-72.

PDF(534 KB)
PDF(534 KB)
电力建设 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 69-72.
发电技术

SCR脱硝系统烟气中SO3测试采样方法对比研究

  • 郭阳,李媛,汪永威,李东梅
作者信息 +

Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System

  • GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, LI Dongmei
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

介绍了采用冷凝控制法和80%异丙醇吸收法分别对选择性催化还原(selective catalytic reduction,SCR)脱硝系统烟气中的SO3进行采样,再用高氯酸钡-钍试剂法分别测定烟气中SO3浓度的过程。对2种采样方法的准确度以及影响因素进行了试验研究。实例试验结果表明,使用冷凝控制法采样测得的SO3浓度偏低,使用80%异丙醇吸收法采样,再用高氯酸钡-钍试剂测定SO3浓度的方法简单、快捷、准确,便于现场监测控制。

Abstract

The sampling and concentration determination of SO3 in flue gas for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitration system is introduced, separately with controlled condensation method and 80% isopropanol absorption method to sample and barium perchlorate-thorin indicator titration method to measure. The accuracy and influencial factors of these two sampling methods were studied and analyzed. The experimental results show that the concentration of SO3 sampled with controlled condensation method is lower than that with 80% isopropanol absorption method. The method that firstly samples SO3 with 80% isopropanol absorption method, then measures the SO3 concentration with barium perchlorate-thorin method, is simple, fast, accurate, and easy to on-site monitoring.

关键词

选择性催化还原(SCR) / 脱硝 / SO3 / 采样 / 冷凝控制法 / 80%异丙醇吸收法

Key words

selective catalytic reduction (SCR) / denitration / SO3 / sampling / controlled condensation method / 80% isopropanol absorption method

引用本文

导出引用
郭阳,李媛,汪永威,李东梅. SCR脱硝系统烟气中SO3测试采样方法对比研究[J]. 电力建设. 2013, 34(6): 69-72
GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, LI Dongmei. Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2013, 34(6): 69-72

参考文献

[1]刘进雄,曾令大.锅炉尾部烟道脱硝技术[C]//2009年火电厂环境保护综合治理技术研讨会论文集. 北京:中国电力杂志社,2009:154-157.

[2]Svachula  J, Alemany U,Ferlazzo N,et al. Oxidation of SO2 to SO3 over honeycomb denoxing catalysts[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem.Res. 1994,33(6):1 644.

[3]Forzattip, Nova I, Beretta A.Catalytic properties in deNOx and SO2-SO3reactions [J].Catalysis Today, 2000, 56 (4):431-441.

[4]Srivastava P K, Miller C A,Erickson C,et al.Emission of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants[J]. Air Waste Manage, 2004, 54(6):750-762.

[5]章新伟, Fuel Tech公司脱硝技术及应用[C]//中电建调试专委会火电厂脱硝技术研讨会论文集.广州:中电建调试专委会,2009.

[6]王智,贾莹光,祁宁.燃煤电站锅炉及SCR脱硝中SO3的生成及危害[J].东北电力技术,2005(9):1-3.

[7]Nervers N D. Air pollution control engineering [M].第2版.北京:麦格劳·希尔 公司,2000:199.

[8]Environmental Protection Agency. EPA METHOD 8-Determination of sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide emissions from stationary sources[S].USA:EPA.

[9]Environmental Protection Agency.EPA METHOD 8A-Determination of sulfuric acid vapor or mist and sulfur dioxide emissions from kraft recovery furnaces[S].USA:EPA.

[10]郭斌.SCR系统的调试、优化及试验[C]//中电建调试专委会火电厂脱硝技术研讨会论文集.广州:中电建调试专委会,2009.

[11]唐志永,金保升,孙克勤,等.湿法脱硫后净烟气酸露点计算公式的比较和评估[J].动力工程,2005(10):18-21.

[12]黄梅芬,沈十林.烟气中二氧化硫及三氧化硫测定方法的研究[J].理化检验:化学分册, 1994,30 (3):138-140.

PDF(534 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章
AI小编
你好!我是《电力建设》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?

/