Energy Planning Methods and Proposals Considering Carbon Budget and Carbon Cycle

doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2021.10.001

Abstract

Abstract:

Carbon reduction in energy sectors is the key to achieve carbon neutrality. This paper firstly expounds the relationship between carbon neutrality and carbon budget. Secondly, a method of energy planning considering the carbon budget and carbon cycle is put forward under carbon neutrality targets. Then, this method is compared with other energy planning methods in terms of planning objectives, research paradigms, carbon constraints, and market factors. Finally, some proposals for future energy planning, such as coupled gas and power, carbon price setting, etc., are advanced. The methods proposed in this paper can provide references for subsequent energy planning considering carbon neutrality.

Key words: carbon neutrality, carbon budget, carbon cycle, energy planning, development scenarios

CLC Number:

TM61

WU Wei, ZHAO Teng, LI Jun, GAO Yi, JIANG Han, GAO Chao. Energy Planning Methods and Proposals Considering Carbon Budget and Carbon Cycle[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 42(10): 1-8.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1 Illustration of carbon neutrality and carbon budget

Fig.2 Comparison among different decarbonization paths

Fig.3 Energy planning process considering carbon budget and carbon cycle

Fig.4 Illustration of carbon cycle between electricity and methane systems

Table 1 Comparison among different energy planning methods

Fig.5 Illustration of strategic and energy triangles

References 29

[1]	European Commision. A European green deal[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
[2]	习近平. 习近平在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2020-09/22/c_1126527647.htm.
[3]	Executive Department State of California. Executive order B-55-18 to achieve carbon neutrality[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://www.ca.gov/archive/gov39/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/9.10.18-Executive-Order.pdf.
[4]	DAVIS S J, LEWIS N S, SHANER M, et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems[J]. Science, 2018, 360(6396): eaas9793. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9793 URL
[5]	Our Worldi n Data. Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from?[EB/OL]. [2021-02-25]. https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector.
[6]	IEA. CO₂ emissions by sector, European Union[EB/OL]. [2021-02-25]. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=EU28&fuel=CO2%20emissions&indicator=CO2BySector.
[7]	European Commision. National energy and climate plans (NECPs)[EB/OL]. [2021-02-26]. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-strategy/national-energy-climate-plans_en.
[8]	全球能源互联网发展合作组织. 欧洲能源互联网研究与展望[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2019: 6-10.
	全球能源互联网发展合作组织. 欧洲能源互联网研究与展望[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2019.
[9]	ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G. TYNDP 2020 scenario report[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://tyndp.entsoe.eu/scenarios.
[10]	李政, 陈思源, 董文娟, 等. 现实可行且成本可负担的中国电力低碳转型路径[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(2): 1-7.
	LI Zheng, CHEN Siyuan, DONG Wenjuan, et al. Feasible and affordable pathways to low-carbon power transition in China[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2021, 27(2): 1-7.
[11]	黄畅, 张攀, 王卫良, 等. 燃煤发电产业升级支撑我国节能减排与碳中和国家战略[J]. 热力发电, 2021, 50(4): 1-6.
	HUANG Chang, ZHANG Pan, WANG Weiliang, et al. The upgradation of coal-fired power generation industry supports China's energy conservation, emission reduction and carbon neutrality[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2021, 50(4): 1-6.
[12]	国网能源研究院有限公司. 全球能源分析与展望-2020[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2020.
[13]	中国石油经济技术研究院. 2050年世界与中国能源展望[R]. 北京: 中国石油经济技术研究院, 2020.
[14]	日本经济产业省. 2050年碳中和绿色发展战略[R]. 东京日本: 日本经济产业省, 2012.
[15]	California Air Resources Board. Achieving carbon neutrality in California[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/e3_cn_draft_report_aug2020.pdf.
[16]	ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G. TYNDP 2020 scenario building guidelines final report[EB/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://tyndp.entsoe.eu/scenarios.
[17]	ALLEN M R, FRAME D J, HUNTINGFORD C, et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne[J]. Nature, 2009, 458(7242): 1163-1166. doi: 10.1038/nature08019 URL
[18]	MATTHEWS H D, GILLETT N P, STOTT P A, et al. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions[J]. Nature, 2009, 459(7248): 829-832. doi: 10.1038/nature08047 URL
[19]	MEINSHAUSEN M, MEINSHAUSEN N, HARE W, et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 ℃[J]. Nature, 2009, 458(7242): 1158-1162. doi: 10.1038/nature08017 URL
[20]	陈晓婷, 陈迎. 从科学和政策视角看碳预算对全球气候治理的作用[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(6): 632-639.
	CHEN Xiaoting, CHEN Ying. The scientific and political views of carbon budget for global climate governance[J]. Climate Change Research, 2018, 14(6): 632-639.
[21]	崔学勤, 王克, 傅莎, 等. 2℃和1.5℃目标下全球碳预算及排放路径[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(11): 4353-4362.
	CUI Xueqin, WANG Ke, FU Sha, et al. Global carbon budget and emissions pathway of 2 ℃ and 1.5 ℃ target[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(11): 4353-4362.
[22]	HÖHNE N, DEN ELZEN M, ESCALANTE D. Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: A comparison of studies[J]. Climate Policy, 2014, 14(1): 122-147. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.849452 URL
[23]	RAUPACH M R, DAVIS S J, PETERS G P, et al. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(10): 873-879. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2384 URL
[24]	WINKLER H, LETETE T, MARQUARD A. Equitable access to sustainable development: Operationalizing key criteria[J]. Climate Policy, 2013, 13(4): 411-432. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.777610 URL
[25]	王慧慧, 刘恒辰, 何霄嘉, 等. 基于代际公平的碳排放权分配研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(6): 1895-1904.
	WANG Huihui, LIU Hengchen, HE Xiaojia, et al. Allocation of carbon emissions right based on the intergenerational equity[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(6): 1895-1904.
[26]	鲍泳宏, 杨钟馗, 杨俊. 国外能源经济学研究综述[J]. 工业技术经济, 2010, 29(6): 27-32.
	BAO Yonghong, YANG Zhongkui, YANG Jun. Summary of foreign energy economics research[J]. Industrial Technology & Economy, 2010, 29(6): 27-32.
[27]	黄毅贤, 张朝晖, 章健强. 基于LEAP模型的厦门市能源规划研究[C]// 2018中国城市规划年会论文集. 杭州, 2018: 274-280.
[28]	BHATTACHARYYA S C. Energy Economics: Concepts, issues, markets and governance[M]. London, UK: Springer, 2019:735-749.
[29]	舒印彪, 薛禹胜, 蔡斌, 等. 关于能源转型分析的评述 (一)转型要素及研究范式[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(9): 7-21.
	SHU Yinbiao, XUE Yusheng, CAI Bin, et al. A review of energy transition analysis part one elementsand paradigms[J]. Automation of ELectric Power Systems, 2018, 42(9): 7-21.