Double-Round Bidding Game Model for P2P Electricity Transactions

doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.07.003

Abstract

Abstract:

P2P transactions are a new transaction mode suitable for distributed electricity prosumers participating in the electricity market. Considering the economic benefits to prosumers and the local consumption of distributed clean energy, a P2P electricity transaction process was developed based on a double-round bidding game, and a game model with the goals of economic benefit and clearing energy was established. An example analysis was conducted for a community with different types of distributed electricity prosumers such as residents, offices, and commerce. Compared with continuous bilateral auctions, one-round bidding games, and P2G, the results of P2P transactions with a double-round bidding game showed that economic benefits increased by 19.01%, 28.78%, and 56.81%, and the local consumption rate of distributed clean energy increased by 10.51%, 24.05%, and 85.10%, respectively. In conclusion, adopting a bidding method and strategy can increase the revenue of distributed electricity prosumers, improve the efficiency of P2P transactions, promote the local consumption of distributed clean energy, and help realize the “double carbon” goal.

Key words: distributed clean energy, P2P electricity transactions, double-round bidding game, economic benefit, local consumption

CLC Number:

TM76

YU Di, HU Jian, ZHANG Xiaojie, JI Ruiqiang. Double-Round Bidding Game Model for P2P Electricity Transactions[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 44(7): 21-32.

Figures/Tables 13

References 30

[1]	TUSHAR W, YUEN C, SAHA T K, et al. Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: a review of recent advances and emerging challenges[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 282: 116131. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116131 URL
[2]	RUAN H B, GAO H J, QIU H F, et al. Distributed operation optimization of active distribution network with P2P electricity trading in blockchain environment[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 331: 120405. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120405 URL
[3]	国家发展改革委, 国家能源局. 关于印发“十四五”可再生能源发展规划的通知[EB/OL].[2022-08-10]. http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/2021-10/21/c_1310611148.htm.
	National Development, and Reform Commission,National Energy Administration. Notice on the issuance of the 14th Five-Year renewable energy development plan[EB/OL]. [2022-08-10]. http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/2021-10/21/c_1310611148.htm.
[4]	SOTO E A, BOSMAN L B, WOLLEGA E, et al. Peer-to-peer energy trading: a review of the literature[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 283: 116268. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116268 URL
[5]	CUTORE E, VOLPE R, SGROI R, et al. Energy management and sustainability assessment of renewable energy communities: the Italian context[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 278: 116713. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116713 URL
[6]	ZHENG B S, WEI W, CHEN Y, et al. A peer-to-peer energy trading market embedded with residential shared energy storage units[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 308: 118400. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118400 URL
[7]	GUO H Y, CHEN Q X, SHAHIDEHPOUR M, et al. Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy[J]. Energy, 2022, 250: 123793. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123793 URL
[8]	詹祥澎, 杨军, 沈一民, 等. 基于价值认同的需求侧电能共享分布式交易策略[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(8): 141-149. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.08.014
	ZHAN Xiangpeng, YANG Jun, SHEN Yimin, et al. Distributed trading strategy based on value recognition mechanism for power sharing at demand side[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2022, 43(8): 141-149. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.08.014
[9]	BANDARA K Y, THAKUR S, BRESLIN J. Flocking-based decentralised double auction for P2P energy trading within neighbourhoods[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2021, 129: 106766. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106766 URL
[10]	SINGH K, GADH R, SINGH A, et al. Design of an optimal P2P energy trading market model using bilevel stochastic optimization[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 328: 120193. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120193 URL
[11]	LI Z P, MA T. Peer-to-peer electricity trading in grid-connected residential communities with household distributed photovoltaic[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 278: 115670. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115670 URL
[12]	LI Z P, MA T. Distributed photovoltaics with peer-to-peer electricity trading[J]. Energy and Built Environment, 2022, 3(4): 424-432. doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2021.04.004 URL
[13]	AN J, HONG T, LEE M. Determining the optimal trading price of electricity for energy consumers and prosumers[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 154: 111851. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111851 URL
[14]	AN J, LEE M, YEOM S, et al. Determining the peer-to-peer electricity trading price and strategy for energy prosumers and consumers within a microgrid[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114335. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114335 URL
[15]	王健, 周念成, 王强钢, 等. 基于区块链和连续双向拍卖机制的微电网直接交易模式及策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(17): 5072-5084, 5304.
	WANG Jian, ZHOU Niancheng, WANG Qianggang, et al. Electricity direct transaction mode and strategy in microgrid based on blockchain and continuous double auction mechanism[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(17): 5072-5084, 5304.
[16]	张凡, 高红均, 吴子豪, 等. 局域能源市场多产消者P2P交易框架设计[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(12): 17-25.
	ZHANG Fan, GAO Hongjun, WU Zihao, et al. Design of P2P trading framework for multiple prosumers in local energy market[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(12): 17-25.
[17]	高红均, 张凡, 刘俊勇, 等. 考虑多产消者差异化特征的社区微网系统P2P交易机制设计[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(4): 1455-1470.
	GAO Hongjun, ZHANG Fan, LIU Junyong, et al. Design of P2P transaction mechanism considering differentiation characteristics of multiple prosumers in community microgrid system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(4): 1455-1470.
[18]	TUSHAR W, SAHA T K, YUEN C, et al. Peer-to-peer energy trading with sustainable user participation: a game theoretic approach[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 62932-62943. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 URL
[19]	LI J K, GE S Y, XU Z Y, et al. A network-secure peer-to-peer trading framework for electricity-carbon integrated market among local prosumers[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 335: 120420. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120420 URL
[20]	李刚, 赵琳颖, 关雪, 等. 基于博弈策略的能源区块链安全交易机制[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(12): 127-135. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2021.12.014
	LI Gang, ZHAO Linying, GUAN Xue, et al. Security transaction mechanism of energy blockchain applying game strategy[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2021, 42(12): 127-135. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2021.12.014
[21]	CHEN Y L, LI Y F, CHEN Q, et al. Energy trading scheme based on consortium blockchain and game theory[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2023, 84: 103699. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2022.103699 URL
[22]	DONG J Y, SONG C H, LIU S, et al. Decentralized peer-to-peer energy trading strategy in energy blockchain environment: a game-theoretic approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 325: 119852. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119852 URL
[23]	WANG J, DOU X, GUO Y M, et al. Purchase strategies for power retailers based on the non-cooperative game[J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 6652-6657. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.039 URL
[24]	JIANG Y N, ZHOU K L, LU X H, et al. Electricity trading pricing among prosumers with game theory-based model in energy blockchain environment[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 271: 115239. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115239 URL
[25]	曹萱. 基于区块链技术的分布式能源交易平台架构设计与实现[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2021.
	CAO Xuan. Design and implementation of distributed energy trading platform architecture based on blockchain technology[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2021.
[26]	路尧, 胡健, 张晓杰, 等. 基于DPoA共识机制的分布式电力交易信用激励[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(1): 116-123.
	LU Yao, HU Jian, ZHANG Xiaojie, et al. Credit incentives of distributed power transaction based on DPoA consensus mechanism[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(1): 116-123.
[27]	DZOBO O, MALILA B, SITHOLE L. Proposed framework for blockchain technology in a decentralised energy network[J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2021, 6(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s41601-021-00209-8
[28]	GE S Y, LI J F, HE X T, et al. Joint energy market design for local integrated energy system service procurement considering demand flexibility[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 297: 117060. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117060 URL
[29]	WU C Y, GU W, YI Z K, et al. Non-cooperative differential game and feedback Nash equilibrium analysis for real-time electricity markets[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2023, 144: 108561. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108561 URL
[30]	LEE W P, HAN D J, WON D. Grid-oriented coordination strategy of prosumers using game-theoretic peer-to-peer trading framework in energy community[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 326: 119980. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119980 URL

交易时段	交易轮次	场景1		场景2		场景3
交易时段	交易轮次	交易电价	交易电量	交易电价	交易电量	交易电价	交易电量
6	第一轮	-0.52	11	-0.43	8	-0.43	8
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		-0.45	3
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	-0.55	3	0	0
7	第一轮	0.41	3	0.44	10	0.44	10
	第二轮	0.40	5	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.42	2			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
8	第一轮	0.40	10	0	0	0	0
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0.42	20
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.41	17
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	27	0.39	7
9	第一轮	0	0	0.46	126	0.46	126
	第二轮	0.42	175	无^①		0.44	49
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	49	0	0
10	第一轮	0.44	80	0.45	261	0.45	261
	第二轮	0.41	64	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.40	90			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0.39	27	0	0	0	0
11	第一轮	0.43	123	0.44	305	0.44	305
	第二轮	0.40	100	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.42	82
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
12	第一轮	0.40	158	0.42	286	0.42	286
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.41	148			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	20	0.39	20
13	第一轮	0.40	170	0.43	267	0.43	267
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0.41	77
	第三轮	0.41	104			无^②
	第四轮	0.44	70
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	77	0	0
14	第一轮	0	0	0.42	174	0.42	174
	第二轮	0.40	68	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.41	50
	第五轮	0.43	56
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
15	第一轮	0.42	99	0.45	185	0.45	185
	第二轮	0.40	40	无^①		0.43	20
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0.44	66
	P2G	0	0	0.39	20	0	0
16	第一轮	0	0	0.46	116	0.46	116
	第二轮	0.43	60	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0.39	56	0	0	0	0

交易时段	交易轮次	场景1		场景2		场景3
交易时段	交易轮次	交易电价	交易电量	交易电价	交易电量	交易电价	交易电量
6	第一轮	-0.52	11	-0.43	8	-0.43	8
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		-0.45	3
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	-0.55	3	0	0
7	第一轮	0.41	3	0.44	10	0.44	10
	第二轮	0.40	5	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.42	2			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
8	第一轮	0.40	10	0	0	0	0
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0.42	20
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.41	17
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	27	0.39	7
9	第一轮	0	0	0.46	126	0.46	126
	第二轮	0.42	175	无^①		0.44	49
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	49	0	0
10	第一轮	0.44	80	0.45	261	0.45	261
	第二轮	0.41	64	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.40	90			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0.39	27	0	0	0	0
11	第一轮	0.43	123	0.44	305	0.44	305
	第二轮	0.40	100	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.42	82
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
12	第一轮	0.40	158	0.42	286	0.42	286
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0.41	148			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	20	0.39	20
13	第一轮	0.40	170	0.43	267	0.43	267
	第二轮	0	0	无^①		0.41	77
	第三轮	0.41	104			无^②
	第四轮	0.44	70
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0.39	77	0	0
14	第一轮	0	0	0.42	174	0.42	174
	第二轮	0.40	68	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0.41	50
	第五轮	0.43	56
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0	0	0	0	0	0
15	第一轮	0.42	99	0.45	185	0.45	185
	第二轮	0.40	40	无^①		0.43	20
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0.44	66
	P2G	0	0	0.39	20	0	0
16	第一轮	0	0	0.46	116	0.46	116
	第二轮	0.43	60	无^①		0	0
	第三轮	0	0			无^②
	第四轮	0	0
	第五轮	0	0
	第六轮	0	0
	P2G	0.39	56	0	0	0	0