A Dynamic Bifurcation-Based Method for Improving Solution Quality in Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flow

LIU Ruimin, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Qi, WANG Peng, DIAO Qixian, WANG Mengxue

Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11) : 30-45.

PDF(4822 KB)
PDF(4822 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11) : 30-45. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.11.003
Planning & Construction

A Dynamic Bifurcation-Based Method for Improving Solution Quality in Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flow

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] To address the limitation that local optimization search methods for alternating-current optimal power flow (AC-OPF) generally converge only to local optima and struggle to obtain higher-quality feasible solutions, this paper investigates a method that can deterministically escape from an obtained local optimum and continue searching for better solutions. [Methods] An augmented quotient gradient system (AQGS) bifurcation-based superior solution search method (ABS) was proposed based on the bifurcation behavior of the AQGS. By analyzing the bifurcation-induced disappearance mechanism of stable equilibrium points corresponding to suboptimal solutions in AC-OPF, this study revealed the influence of penalty-parameter adjustment on the equilibrium-point structure of the AQGS. Furthermore, the saddle-node bifurcation between a stable equilibrium point and a type-1 unstable equilibrium point was exploited to eliminate the stable equilibrium point corresponding to the current local optimum, thereby guiding the system trajectory to converge to a new optimal solution. [Results] The proposed method was validated on multi-solution test systems with 2, 3, 9, and 300 buses. Numerical results show that ABS successfully obtains feasible local optima with lower objective function values from given local optima in all tested cases, achieving maximum objective-function improvements of 2.92%, 0.21%, 27.60%, and 2.46%, respectively. [Conclusions] The proposed ABS method uses the bifurcation behavior of the AQGS to achieve deterministic escape from local optima and improve solution quality. It provides a new analytical perspective and computational method for multi-solution search and local optimum improvement in AC-OPF, verifying its effectiveness in complex multi-solution power flow optimization problems.

Key words

alternating-current optimal power flow(AC-OPF) / local optimum / augmented quotient gradient system / bifurcation

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Ruimin , WANG Zhiyuan , WANG Qi , et al . A Dynamic Bifurcation-Based Method for Improving Solution Quality in Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flow[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2026, 47(11): 30-45 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.11.003

References

[1]
Chiang H D, Wang T. On the existence of and lower bounds for the number of optimal power flow solutions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(2): 1116-1126.
[2]
Bukhsh W A, Grothey A, McKinnon K I M, et al. Local solutions of the optimal power flow problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(4): 4780-4788.
[3]
林哲, 胡泽春, 宋永华. 最优潮流问题的凸松弛技术综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(13): 3717-3728.
Lin Zhe, Hu Zechun, Song Yonghua. Convex relaxation for optimal power flow problem: a recent review[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(13): 3717-3728.
[4]
陈一丰, 黄铭浩, 董树锋. 计及配电侧分布式电源的输配协同高收敛性最优潮流研究[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43(4): 36-44.
Chen Yifeng, Huang Minghao, Dong Shufeng. Research on improving the convergence of optimal power flow of transmission-distribution-coupled networks[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2024, 43(4): 36-44.
[5]
韦延宏, 夏小琴, 任先成, 等. 基于可行空间并行的安全约束最优潮流[J]. 电力工程技术, 2021, 40(6): 205-209.
Wei Yanhong, Xia Xiaoqin, Ren Xiancheng, et al. Security constrained optimal power flow based on parallel adjustment space[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2021, 40(6): 205-209.
[6]
Kardoš J, Kourounis D, Schenk O, et al. BELTISTOS: a robust interior point method for large-scale optimal power flow problems[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2022, 212: 108613.
[7]
朱泽安, 王承民, 马明, 等. 基于拉格朗日函数鞍距分配的广义内点法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(5): 18-24.
Zhu Zean, Wang Chengmin, Ma Ming, et al. Generalized interior-point method based on Lagrange function saddle space distribution[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(5): 18-24.
[8]
Wächterchter A, Biegler L T. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming[J]. Mathematical Programming, 2006, 106(1): 25-57.
[9]
黄兴华, 张功林, 陈飞雄, 等. 计及分布式电源仿射模型的配电网高斯迭代潮流算法[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2025, 40(2): 89-99.
Huang Xinghua, Zhang Gonglin, Chen Feixiong, et al. Gaussian iterative power flow algorithm for distribution network considering affine model of distributed generation[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2025, 40(2): 89-99.
[10]
陈谦, 陈杉桐, 张裕, 等. 基于统一潮流控制器的负序抑制最优潮流算法[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2025, 40(1): 47-54.
Chen Qian, Chen Shantong, Zhang Yu, et al. Optimal power flow algorithm with negative-sequence suppression based on unified power flow controller[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2025, 40(1): 47-54.
[11]
王海军, 邢东峰, 朱宏超, 等. 基于PSD-BPA的无功潮流收敛性二阶段自动调整方法[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37(11): 72-82.
Wang Haijun, Xing Dongfeng, Zhu Hongchao, et al. Two-stage automatic adjustment method for reactive power flow convergence based on PSD-BPA[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37(11): 72-82.
[12]
易海琼, 刘宏杨, 王梓怡, 等. 基于灵敏度因子的随机电网规划方法[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37(2): 1-9.
Yi Haiqiong, Liu Hongyang, Wang Ziyi, et al. Stochastic power grid planning using sensitivity factors[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37(2): 1-9.
[13]
Bakirtzis A G, Biskas P N, Zoumas C E, et al. Optimal power flow by enhanced genetic algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 17(2): 229-236.
[14]
欧阳晨, 卫志农, 孙国强. 基于树木生长算法的含UPFC的最优潮流计算[J]. 电力工程技术, 2020, 39(3): 84-91.
Ouyang Chen, Wei Zhinong, Sun Guoqiang. Optimal power flow with UPFC based on tree growth algorithm[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2020, 39(3): 84-91.
[15]
Low S H. Convex relaxation of optimal power flow: part I: formulations and equivalence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 2014, 1(1): 15-27.
[16]
Low S H. Convex relaxation of optimal power flow: part II: exactness[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 2014, 1(2): 177-189.
[17]
Gan L W, Li N, Topcu U, et al. Exact convex relaxation of optimal power flow in radial networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015, 60(1): 72-87.
[18]
Coffrin C, Hijazi H L, Van Hentenryck P. The QC relaxation: a theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(4): 3008-3018.
[19]
Venzke A, Chatzivasileiadis S, Molzahn D K. Inexact convex relaxations for AC optimal power flow: towards AC feasibility[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2020, 187: 106480.
[20]
Molzahn D K. Computing the feasible spaces of optimal power flow problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(6): 4752-4763.
[21]
Skolfield J K, Escobedo A R. Operations research in optimal power flow: a guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 300(2): 387-404.
[22]
刘承锡, 徐慎凯, 赖秋频. 基于全纯嵌入法的非迭代电力系统最优潮流计算[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(11): 2870-2882.
Liu Chengxi, Xu Shenkai, Lai Qiupin. Non-iterative optimal power flow calculation based on holomorphic embedding method[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(11): 2870-2882.
[23]
Wu D, Molzahn D K, Lesieutre B C, et al. A deterministic method to identify multiple local extrema for the AC optimal power flow problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(1): 654-668.
[24]
Wu W P, Hu Z C, Song Y H. A new method for OPF combining interior point method and filled function method[C]// 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 2016: 1-5.
[25]
Zhang Y F, Chiang H D, Wang T. A novel TRUST-TECH-enabled trajectory-unified methodology for computing multiple optimal solutions of constrained nonlinear optimization: theory and computation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(1): 473-484.
[26]
Branin F H. Widely convergent method for finding multiple solutions of simultaneous nonlinear equations[J]. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 1972, 16(5): 504-522.
[27]
Shashikala H, Sancheti N K, Keerthi S S. A new approach to global optimization using ideas from nonlinear stability theory[C]// 1992 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, 1992: 2817-2820.
[28]
Wah B W, Chang Y J. Trace-based methods for solving nonlinear global optimization and satisfiability problems[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 10(2): 107-141.
[29]
Chiang H D, Chu C C. A systematic search method for obtaining multiple local optimal solutions of nonlinear programming problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 1996, 43(2): 99-109.
[30]
Lee J, Chiang H D. A dynamical trajectory-based methodology for systematically computing multiple optimal solutions of general nonlinear programming problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2004, 49(6): 888-899.
[31]
王志远, 李腾木, 吕宪龙, 等. 基于增广商梯度系统的鲁棒高效交流最优潮流算法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(2): 532-544.
Wang Zhiyuan, Li Tengmu, Lyu Xianlong, et al. Robust and efficient AC optimal power flow algorithm based on augmented quotient gradient systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, 46(2): 532-544.
[32]
衣涛, 王承民, 谢宁, 等. 电力系统的多重(维)鞍结分岔点及其特征分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2015, 30(20): 145-150.
Yi Tao, Wang Chengmin, Xie Ning, et al. Power system multiple saddle-node bifurcation point and its characteristic analysis[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2015, 30(20): 145-150.
[33]
姜涛, 张明宇, 崔晓丹, 等. 电力系统静态电压稳定域边界快速搜索的优化模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(17): 4167-4179.
Jiang Tao, Zhang Mingyu, Cui Xiaodan, et al. A novel optimization model to explore static voltage stability region boundary in bulk power systems[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(17): 4167-4179.
[34]
Wu Z Y, Bai F S, Yang X Q, et al. An exact lower order penalty function and its smoothing in nonlinear programming[J]. Optimization, 2004, 53(1): 51-68.
[35]
Chiang H D, Alberto L F C. Stability regions of nonlinear dynamical systems: theory, estimation, and applications[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[36]
Chiang H D, Jiang C Y. Feasible region of optimal power flow: characterization and applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(1): 236-244.
[37]
Dobson I, Chiang H D. Towards a theory of voltage collapse in electric power systems[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 1989, 13(3): 253-262.

Footnotes

利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests): 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

作者贡献声明(Authors' Contributions): 刘睿敏提出研究思路,建立研究模型,完成方法设计、程序开发、算例分析与结果验证,绘制图表并撰写、修改论文;王志远参与研究方案设计与理论分析,负责项目管理及经费支持,并对论文进行审阅和修改;王琦参与研究结果讨论与算例结果检验,对论文内容及技术表述进行审阅和修改;王鹏参与研究资料整理、算例设置及数据合理性分析,并对论文进行审阅;刁其先提供工程应用背景及相关技术资料,参与实际运行场景和研究结果合理性讨论,并对论文提出修改建议;王梦雪参与文献资料收集、数据整理及图表校核,协助完成论文格式检查和文字修改。所有作者均阅读并同意了论文最终稿内容。

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52407109)
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20240593)
PDF(4822 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Recommended

/

〈 〉