• CSCD核心库收录期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊

Electric Power Construction ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 33-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7229.2017.08.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis and Comparison of DC Fault Handling Strategies for Hybrid HVDC System

LU Yi1, LI Jihong1, QIU Peng1, XIAO Huangqing2, LIU Gaoren2, XU Zheng2#br#   

  1. (1. Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Company, Hangzhou 310014, China;
    2. College of Electric Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)
  • Online:2017-08-01
  • Supported by:
     

Abstract: ABSTRACT: The hybrid high voltage direct current (hybrid HVDC) transmission system based on line commutated converter (LCC) and modular multilevel converter (MMC) is a feasible solution for long distance bulk power transmission. In order to handle the DC short-circuit fault, two kinds of methods can be adopted. The first one is to use the sub-modules (SMs) which have the capability of DC-fault clearance in inverter side converter, such as full-bridge SMs and clamp-double SMs. The second one is to arrange high-power diode at the MMC DC port to cut off the current flow path after the fault. Through analyzing the physical mechanism and control flow of different DC fault handling strategies, this paper studies its feasibility and applicability. The typical testing system is built in PSCAD/EMTDC, the system response under DC fault is investigated, and the system transient characteristics under different strategies are compared. In addition, the non-block DC-fault-handling strategy based on full-bridge SMs is simulated and verified. The results show that this kind of solution is not suitable for the bipolar HVDC system and the DC fault current can not be blocked thoroughly.

Key words:  line commutated converter (LCC), modular multilevel converter (MMC), hybrid high voltage direct current transmission system, DC fault, non-block DC-fault-handling strategy

CLC Number: