A Review on Modeling of Hydrogen Production System with Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis

SONG Jie, GAO Jie, LIANG Danxi, LI Gendi, DENG Zhanfeng, XU Guizhi, ZHANG Leiqi, XIE Changjun, XU Chao

Electric Power Construction ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 58-78.

PDF(7174 KB)
PDF(7174 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 58-78. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2024.02.006
Smart Grid

A Review on Modeling of Hydrogen Production System with Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis is adaptable to power fluctuation owing to its advantages of fast response and wide power adjustment range. It can be used as a flexible and adjustable resource to match the dynamic power grid supply and demand, and improve the penetration of renewable energy. This study summarizes and analyzes the modeling methods and research progress of the PEM water electrolysis system, expounds the basis for selecting parameters, and prospects the improvement direction of the PEM water electrolysis system from four aspects of water, heat, electricity, and gas. The model is an essential tool in the model development of the electrolysis hydrogen production system. In this study, the static performances and dynamic behaviors of the PEM water electrolysis system can be clarified by modeling, which can effectively support the design, operation, and control optimization of the system. This research review has certain theoretical value and guiding significance for the model establishment, development, and simulation analysis of the PEM electrolysis hydrogen production system.

Key words

proton exchange membrane electrolysis hydrogen production / system modeling / electrolyzer modeling / water-heat-electricity-gas

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jie SONG , Jie GAO , Danxi LIANG , et al . A Review on Modeling of Hydrogen Production System with Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2024, 45(2): 58-78 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2024.02.006

References

[1]
GRIFFITHS S, SOVACOOL B K, KIM J, et al. Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: a critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021, 80: 102208.
[2]
INAL O B, ZINCIR B, DENIZ C. Investigation on the decarbonization of shipping: an approach to hydrogen and ammonia[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(45): 19888-19900.
[3]
OLIVEIRA A M, BESWICK R R, YAN Y S. A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2021, 33: 100701.
[4]
LOTT P, WAGNER U, KOCH T, et al. Hydrogen combustion engines-chances and challenges on the way towards a decarbonized mobility[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2022, 94(3): 217-229.
[5]
张焱, 郝振波, 朱振涛, 等. 海上风能岸上制氢的经济可行性分析[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(3): 148-154.
Abstract
我国沿海地区经济发达,能源需求量大,探索海上风电制氢为其他行业供能具有现实意义。比较了海上风电输电上岸后的两种利用模式:1)风电售电模式;2)风电制氢模式。首先通过比较碱性(alkaline,ALK)电解槽和质子交换膜(proton exchange membrane,PEM)电解槽的工作特性,建立了制氢系统产氢量模型。其次,建立两种模式的经济分析模型;最后,结合净现值和平准化制氢成本比较了不同风能利用模式的经济性。结果表明在当前技术情景下,氢价取46.93元/kg、风电上网电价取0.531 8元/(kW·h)时,风电制氢模式比风电售电模式更具有经济性,氢价是影响制氢模式经济性的最大因素,而氢价取决于未来氢市场的供需关系,不确定性较大。
ZHANG Yan, HAO Zhenbo, ZHU Zhentao, et al. Economic feasibility analysis of onshore hydrogen production using offshore wind power[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(3): 148-154.

The coastal areas of China are economically developed and have a large energy demand. It is of practical significance to explore the production of hydrogen using offshore wind power to supply energy to other industries. This paper compares two utilization modes of offshore wind power after transmission on shore, i.e., direct sales and use for hydrogen production. Firstly, by comparing the power characteristics of alkaline (ALK) and proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers, the hydrogen production model is established. Secondly, the economic models of the two modes are established. Finally, the economy of different wind energy utilization modes are compared using net present value (NPV) and levelized cost of hydrogen production (LCOH). The results show that, under the current technical scenario, when the hydrogen price is 46.93 yuan/kg and the feed-in electricity price of wind power is 0.5318 yuan/(kW·h), the wind power used for hydrogen production is more economical than the wind power sales mode. The hydrogen price is the biggest factor affecting the economics of the hydrogen production model, where the hydrogen price depends on the supply and demand relationship in the future hydrogen market, and there is great uncertainty.

[6]
王士博, 孔令国, 蔡国伟, 等. 电力系统氢储能关键应用技术现状、挑战及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(17): 6660-6681.
WANG Shibo, KONG Lingguo, CAI Guowei, et al. Current status, challenges, and prospects of key application technologies for hydrogen storage in power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(17): 6660-6681.
[7]
李建林, 张则栋, 李光辉, 等. 基于模型层级分析的质子交换膜电解槽建模研究进展[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49(3): 1105-1117.
LI Jianlin, ZHANG Zedong, LI Guanghui, et al. Research on modeling of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer based on model hierarchical analysis[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2023, 49(3): 1105-1117.
[8]
FALCÃO D S, PINTO A M F R. A review on PEM electrolyzer modelling: guidelines for beginners[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261: 121184.
[9]
OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA P B. Low-temperature electrolysis system modelling: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78: 280-300.
[10]
MAJUMDAR A, HAAS M, ELLIOT I, et al. Control and control-oriented modeling of PEM water electrolyzers: a review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(79): 30621-30641.
[11]
吴启亮, 章雷其, 赵波. 可再生能源制氢建模技术研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2023, 42(5): 18-33.
WU Qiliang, ZHANG Leiqi, ZHAO Bo. A study of the modeling technology of hydrogen production from renewable energy sources[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2023, 42(5): 18-33.
[12]
温昶, 张博涵, 王雅钦, 等. 高效质子交换膜电解水制氢技术研究进展[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(1): 111-122.
WEN Chang, ZHANG Bohan, WANG Yaqin, et al. Research progress of high efficiency proton exchange membrane water electrolysis technology[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(1): 111-122.
[13]
任和, 刘宏伟, 顾亚京, 等. 基于Hammerstein模型的PEM电解槽动态模型[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2022, 43(9): 2324-2332.
REN He, LIU Hongwei, GU Yajing, et al. Dynamic modeling of PEM electrolyzer based on Hammerstein model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(9): 2324-2332.
[14]
OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA B. Modelling, simulation and analysis of a PEM electrolysis system[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(12): 1014-1019.
[15]
YAVUZ H. Modelling and simulation of a heaving wave energy converter based PEM hydrogen generation and storage system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(50): 26413-26425.
[16]
GÖßLING S, STYPKA S, BAHR M, et al. Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis modeling for system simulation and degradation analysis[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2018, 90(10): 1437-1442.
[17]
SUERMANN M, SCHMIDT T J, BÜCHI F N. Cell performance determining parameters in high pressure water electrolysis[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 211: 989-997.
[18]
MORADI NAFCHI F, AFSHARI E, BANIASADI E, et al. A parametric study of polymer membrane electrolyser performance, energy and exergy analyses[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(34): 18662-18670.
[19]
HAN B, MO J K, KANG Z Y, et al. Effects of membrane electrode assembly properties on two-phase transport and performance in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 188: 317-326.
[20]
张顺星, 苑易伟, 胡平, 等. 光伏-PEM直接耦合电解水制氢系统研究[J]. 工业仪表与自动化装置, 2022(3): 49-52.
ZHANG Shunxing, YUAN Yiwei, HU Ping, et al. Research on photovoltaic-PEM electrolytic water hydrogen direct coupling system[J]. Industrial Instrumentation & Automation, 2022(3): 49-52.
[21]
JING K, LIU C. Online observer of the voltage components of the PEM electrolyzer based on the time-varying linearization of the semi-empirical model[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 299-307.
[22]
SARTORY M, WALLNÖFER-OGRIS E, SALMAN P, et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of an asymmetric high pressure PEM water electrolyser up to 155 bar[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(52): 30493-30508.
[23]
AUBRAS F, DESEURE J, KADJO J J A, et al. Two-dimensional model of low-pressure PEM electrolyser: two-phase flow regime, electrochemical modelling and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(42): 26203-26216.
[24]
阮景昕, 王跃社, 张俊峰, 等. 基于氢储能的风光氢能源系统能质转换优化策略[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44(2): 413-421.
RUAN Jingxin, WANG Yueshe, ZHANG Junfeng, et al. Energy-mass conersion optimization strategy of wind-solar-hydrogen energy system based on hydrogen energy storage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2023, 44(2): 413-421.
[25]
CHEN Q, WANG Y, YANG F, et al. Two-dimensional multi-physics modeling of porous transport layer in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer for water splitting[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(58): 32984-32994.
[26]
陈锦洲, 林飞, 何洪文, 等. 质子交换膜燃料电池/电解槽系统建模及负荷追踪策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(S2): 636-643.
CHEN Jinzhou, LIN Fei, HE Hongwen, et al. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell/electrolyzer hybrid power system modeling and load tracking strategy[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(S2): 636-643.
[27]
FOLGADO F J, GONZÁLEZ I, CALDERÓN A J. Simulation platform for the assessment of PEM electrolyzer models oriented to implement digital Replicas[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 267: 115917.
[28]
TIJANI A S, BINTI KAMARUDIN N A, BINTI MAZLAN F A. Investigation of the effect of charge transfer coefficient (CTC) on the operating voltage of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(19): 9119-9132.
[29]
SANTARELLI M G, TORCHIO M F. Experimental analysis of the effects of the operating variables on the performance of a single PEMFC[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007, 48(1): 40-51.
[30]
MARANGIO F, SANTARELLI M, CALÌ M. Theoretical model and experimental analysis of a high pressure PEM water electrolyser for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(3): 1143-1158.
[31]
ABDIN Z, WEBB C J, GRAY E M. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(39): 13243-13257.
[32]
YIGIT T, SELAMET O F. Mathematical modeling and dynamic Simulink simulation of high-pressure PEM electrolyzer system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(32): 13901-13914.
[33]
BERNARDI D M, VERBRUGGE M W. Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte[J]. AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(8): 1151-1163.
[34]
LEE J, ALAM A, JU H. Multidimensional and transient modeling of an alkaline water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(26): 13678-13690.
[35]
WANG Q Q, TANG F M, LI B, et al. Numerical analysis of static and dynamic heat transfer behaviors inside proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 488: 229419.
[36]
FERREIRA R B, FALCÃO D S, PINTO A M F R. Simulation of membrane chemical degradation in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell by computational fluid dynamics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(1): 1106-1120.
[37]
TOGHYANI S, FAKHRADINI S, AFSHARI E, et al. Optimization of operating parameters of a polymer exchange membrane electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(13): 6403-6414.
[38]
TSUKAMOTO T, AOKI T, KANESAKA H, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of full-scale proton exchange membrane fuel cells at high current densities[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 488: 229412.
[39]
AGBLI K S, PÉRA M C, HISSEL D, et al. Multiphysics simulation of a PEM electrolyser: energetic macroscopic representation approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(2): 1382-1398.
[40]
CHOI P, BESSARABOV D G, DATTA R. A simple model for solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) water electrolysis[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 175(1/2/3/4): 535-539.
[41]
HWANG J J, LAI L K, WU W, et al. Dynamic modeling of a photovoltaic hydrogen fuel cell hybrid system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(23): 9531-9542.
[42]
POLVERINO P, PIANESE C. Model-based prognostic algorithm for online RUL estimation of PEMFCs[C]// 2016 3rd Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol). IEEE, 2016: 599-604.
[43]
MARR C, LI X. An engineering model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance[J]. ARI - an International Journal for Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1997, 50(4): 190-200.
[44]
NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(10): 2748-2756.
[45]
HARRISON K W, HERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO E, MANN M, et al. Semiempirical model for determining PEM electrolyzer stack characteristics[J]. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2006, 3(2): 220-223.
A semiempirical equation was used to represent the performance characteristics of a 20-cell proton exchange membrane electrolyzer stack. The coefficients of the equation are the exchange current densities and membrane conductivity. These coefficients were determined using experimental data and a nonlinear curve fitting method. The anode exchange current density was found to be 1.65×10−8Acm−2, the cathode exchange current density 0.09Acm−2, and the membrane conductivity 0.075Scm−1. External programmable power supplies were used to obtain the (I‐V) characteristic curve of a commercial proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Stack current, voltage, and system temperature were monitored while 1A current steps were applied to the electrolyzer stack.
[46]
HERNÁNDEZ-GÓMEZ Á, RAMIREZ V, GUILBERT D, et al. Development of an adaptive static-dynamic electrical model based on input electrical energy for PEM water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 18817-18830.
[47]
HERNÁNDEZ-GÓMEZ Á, RAMIREZ V, GUILBERT D, et al. Cell voltage static-dynamic modeling of a PEM electrolyzer based on adaptive parameters: development and experimental validation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163: 1508-1522.
[48]
RAKOUSKY C, REIMER U, WIPPERMANN K, et al. Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 342: 38-47.
[49]
苏昕, 徐立军, 胡兵. 考虑多变量因素影响的光伏PEM制氢系统建模与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 521-529.
Abstract
针对复杂工况对光伏制氢系统性能产生不确定性的影响,提出考虑多变量因素影响的光伏制氢系统模型,探索辐照度、温度、膜厚、压力等因素对光伏质子交换膜(PEM)制氢系统的影响。系统首先建立考虑辐照度、温度、膜厚、压力等因素影响的光伏-质子交换膜电解槽-氢储罐的光伏制氢模型,之后对系统进行定量计算和定性分析,并依据实际光伏数据进行实验验证。结果表明,在额定功率范围内,太阳电池输出电流和功率随辐照度的增加而增大,随温度的升高而降低。质子交换膜电解槽电压随辐照度、膜厚、压力的增加而增大,随温度的升高而减小。太阳电池输出功率、质子交换膜电解槽电压的变化趋势与辐照度变化趋势具有一致性。最终计算得到太阳电池系统、质子交换膜电解槽系统和总系统效率分别为16.8%、72.2%和12.1%。
SU Xin, XU Lijun, HU Bing. Modelling and analysis of photovoltaic pem hydrogen production system considering multivariable factors[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 521-529.
For the uncertain influence of complicated working conditions on the photovoltaic hydrogen production system performance, this paper puts forward a photovoltaic hydrogen production system model that takes into account the influence of multivariable factors and explores the effects of the light intensity, temperature, film thickness, pressure and other factors on the photovoltaic-proton exchange membrane (PEM) hydrogen production system. The PV hydrogen production model of solar cell-proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, which considers the solar irradiance, temperature, film thickness and pressure and other factors, is first established in the system. Then, the system is quantitatively calculated and qualitatively analyzed and is also experimentally verified based on the actual PV data. The results show that within the rated power range, the solar cell output current and power increase with light intensity and decrease with the temperature increase. In addition, the PEM electrolyzer voltage increases with light intensity, film thickness and pressure, and decreases with temperature. The trend of the solar cell output power and PEM electrolyzer voltage are consistent with the trends of the light intensity. At last, the calculation show that there are 16.8%, 72.2% and 12.1% efficiencies for the solar cell system, the PEM electrolyzer system and the total system, respectively.
[50]
ZAWODZINSKI T A Jr, NEEMAN M, SILLERUD L O, et al. Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1991, 95(15): 6040-6044.
[51]
ZAWODZINSKI T A, DAVEY J, VALERIO J, et al. The water content dependence of electro-osmotic drag in proton-conducting polymer electrolytes[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 1995, 40(3): 297-302.
[52]
周嫣. 质子交换膜燃料电池建模与动态响应仿真分析[J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2022(14): 113-117.
ZHOU Yan. Modeling and dynamic response simulation analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, 2022(14): 113-117.
[53]
ATLAM Ö, DÜNDAR G. A practical equivalent electrical circuit model for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(24): 13230-13239.
[54]
LEBBAL M E, LECŒUCHE S. Identification and monitoring of a PEM electrolyser based on dynamical modelling[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(14): 5992-5999.
[55]
RUUSKANEN V, KOPONEN J, HUOMAN K, et al. PEM water electrolyzer model for a power-hardware-in-loop simulator[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16): 10775-10784.
[56]
KAYA M F, DEMIR N. Numerical investigation of PEM water electrolysis performance for different oxygen evolution electrocatalysts[J]. Fuel Cells, 2017, 17(1): 37-47.
[57]
OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA B. Dynamic and multiphysic PEM electrolysis system modelling: a bond graph approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(22): 14872-14904.
[58]
SHEN M Z, BENNETT N, DING Y L, et al. A concise model for evaluating water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(22): 14335-14341.
[59]
AOUALI F Z, BECHERIF M, RAMADAN H S, et al. Analytical modelling and experimental validation of proton exchange membrane electrolyser for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(2): 1366-1374.
[60]
BIAKU C Y, DALE N V, MANN M D, et al. A semiempirical study of the temperature dependence of the anode charge transfer coefficient of a 6 kW PEM electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(16): 4247-4254.
[61]
SÁNCHEZ M, AMORES E, ABAD D, et al. Aspen Plus model of an alkaline electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(7): 3916-3929.
[62]
WANG J T, YUAN J L, SUNDEN B. Modeling of inhomogeneous compression effects of porous GDL on transport phenomena and performance in PEM fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2017, 41(7): 985-1003.
[63]
KHAN M J, IQBAL M T. Modelling and analysis of electro-chemical, thermal, and reactant flow dynamics for a PEM fuel cell system[J]. Fuel Cells, 2005, 5(4): 463-475.
[64]
SAEED E W, WARKOZEK E G. Modeling and analysis of renewable PEM fuel cell system[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 74: 87-101.
[65]
陈建业. 非并网风电制氢系统建模与控制研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2022.
CHEN Jianye. Research on modeling and control of non-grid-connected wind power hydrogen production system[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[66]
ABOMAZID A M, EL-TAWEEL N A, FARAG H E Z. Novel analytical approach for parameters identification of PEM electrolyzer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(9): 5870-5881.
[67]
LEE W K, SHIMPALEE S, VAN ZEE J W. Verifying predictions of water and current distributions in a serpentine flow field polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2003, 150(3): A341.
[68]
AWASTHI A, SCOTT K, BASU S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(22): 14779-14786.
[69]
密路祥. 风电电解水制氢系统的电解特性的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
MI Luxiang. Study on electrolytic characteristics of hydrogen production system by water electrolysis of wind power[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021.
[70]
HERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO E, SINGH D, HUTTON P N, et al. A macro-level model for determining the performance characteristics of solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 138(1/2): 174-186.
[71]
ZHU H Y, KEE R J. A general mathematical model for analyzing the performance of fuel-cell membrane-electrode assemblies[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 117(1/2): 61-74.
[72]
MEDINA P, SANTARELLI M. Analysis of water transport in a high pressure PEM electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(11): 5173-5186.
[73]
LI X J, QU S G, YU H M, et al. Membrane water-flow rate in electrolyzer cells with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE)[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 190(2): 534-537.
[74]
GARCÍA-VALVERDE R, ESPINOSA N, URBINA A. Simple PEM water electrolyser model and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1927-1938.
[75]
FRAGIACOMO P, GENOVESE M. Modeling and energy demand analysis of a scalable green hydrogen production system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(57): 30237-30255.
[76]
ZHAO D Q, HE Q J, YU J, et al. A data-driven digital-twin model and control of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(14): 8687-8699.
[77]
ESPINOSA-LÓPEZ M, DARRAS C, POGGI P, et al. Modelling and experimental validation of a 46 kW PEM high pressure water electrolyzer[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 119: 160-173.
[78]
YANG B, LI J L, LI Y L, et al. A critical survey of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system control: summaries, advances, and perspectives[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(17): 9986-10020.
[79]
WANG Y X, CHEN Q, OU K, et al. Time delay thermal control of a compact proton exchange membrane fuel cell against disturbances and noisy measurements[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 244: 114444.
[80]
YUAN Z, WANG W Q, HE S, et al. Interval-based LQR strategy for optimal control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system with interval uncertainties[J]. ISA Transactions, 2020, 100: 334-345.
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) are a type of the increasingly developed sustainable energy systems which have been turned into one of the most popular of them in the last decade. The performance of these types of fuel cells is the best among the others; however, they can be better by an authentic control to maintain in the maximum efficiency in the operative points during the current ripples. To do this and also to improve the value of the output voltage, the two-phase interleaved boost converter is utilized. Since boost converter has uncertain parameters and disturbances in their essence, using the ordinary methods for the control of them can ignore some of the principal parameters. In this study, a new technique is utilized for optimal control of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells with interval uncertain parameters. Here, we consider the uncertainties in the converter inherent. Because of considering the uncertainties in the system, controllability of the system is first testified based on interval arithmetic. Then, an extended version of the linear quadratic regulator strategy using interval analysis is employed for achieving a reliable and optimal solution. Chebyshev inclusion method is utilized for solving the Pontryagins problem of the LQR problem. Eventually, by solving the interval version of the Riccati equations, the robust range for optimal control of the PEMFC is obtained. The results of the proposed system are finally compared with Monte Carlo method for showing the efficiency of the presented technique.Copyright © 2019 ISA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[81]
闫庆友, 史超凡, 秦光宇, 等. 基于近端策略优化算法的电化学/氢混合储能系统双层配置及运行优化[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(8): 22-32.
Abstract
针对电化学储能和氢储能的互补特性,提出了一种包含电化学和氢储能的混合储能系统配置和运行的综合优化模型,并提出了智能算法进行求解。该模型基于双层决策优化问题,将混合储能系统配置及运行2个不同时间维度的问题分上下层进行综合求解,并考虑了两者间的相互影响,采用强化学习近端策略优化(proximal policy optimization,PPO)算法求解该双层优化模型。以甘肃省某地区的风光数据,通过对比应用多种传统算法求解结果,验证了所用算法在复杂环境下适应度最高且收敛速度最快。研究结果表明,应用该模型最大可降低24%的弃风、弃光率,有效提升系统综合效益。氢储能作为容量型储能配置不受地形因素限制,适用于多样的应用场景,从而为氢储能这一新型储能形态在全国的广泛配置提供了应用示范。
YAN Qingyou, SHI Chaofan, QIN Guangyu, et al. Research on two-layer configuration and operation optimization based on proximal policy optimization for electrochemical/hydrogen hybrid energy storage system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2022, 43(8): 22-32.

According to the complementary characteristics of electrochemical energy storage and hydrogen storage, an integrated optimization model for the configuration and operation of a hybrid energy storage system is given, including electrochemical energy storage, hydrogen storage proposed and an intelligent algorithm. The model is based on a two-layer decision optimization problem, in which two different time dimensions of the hybrid energy storage system configuration and operation are solved in upper and lower layers, and the interaction between them is considered. A reinforcement learning proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm is used to solve the two-layer optimization model. By comparing the results of applying various traditional algorithms to solve the scenery data of a region in Gansu Province, it is verified that the used algorithm has the highest adaptability and the fastest convergence speed in a complex environment. The results show that the application of this model can reduce the abandoning rate of wind and solar power by 24% and effectively improve the comprehensive benefit of the system, and that hydrogen storage as a capacity-based energy storage configuration is not limited by topographical factors and is suitable for diverse application scenarios, thus providing an application demonstration for the widespread deployment of hydrogen storage, a new form of energy storage, in the whole country.

[82]
贺旭辉, 王灿, 李欣然, 等. 计及CLHG-SOFC碳捕集的多能源系统低碳优化调度[J]. 智慧电力, 2023, 51(5): 57-64.
HE Xuhui, WANG Can, LI Xinran, et al. Low carbon optimal scheduling of multi-energy system considering CLHG-SOFC carbon capture[J]. Smart Power, 2023, 51(5): 57-64.
[83]
檀勤良, 单子婧, 丁毅宏, 等. 考虑蓄电池与电制氢的多能源微网灵活性资源配置双层优化模型[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(2): 38-49.
Abstract
高比例可再生能源的间歇性进一步加剧了电力系统安全稳定运行风险,使得灵活性资源配置愈发关键,因此有必要开展电力系统灵活性资源规划配置研究。文章提出了一种考虑蓄电池与电制氢设备特性的微网灵活性资源配置与运行协同优化双层模型。上层目标为系统年碳排放量最小与年化综合利润最大,下层目标为系统日运营利润最大,开展满足电-氢负荷下的容量规划案例分析,并设置不同灵活性技术成本下降情景,设计经济性、清洁性、灵活性指标对比评判不同情景下两种技术的竞争力。结果表明:所提优化配置方法能够以较小的经济代价实现系统环境效益的大幅提升,目前蓄电池相较电制氢技术更具综合性优势,但后者在未来具有更大的获益空间和市场潜力。
TAN Qinliang, SHAN Zijing, DING Yihong, et al. Bi-level optimal configuration for flexible resources of multi-energy microgrid considering storage battery and P2H[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(2): 38-49.

The intermittence of high proportion of renewable energy further aggravates the insecure operation of power system, which makes flexible resources configuration more critical. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research on flexible resources planning and configuration of power system. For the multi-energy microgrid, a bi-level collaborative optimization method of configuration and operation of flexible resources is proposed in this paper, considering the characteristics of storage battery and power to hydrogen (P2H) equipment. Taking the minimum total annual carbon emissions and the maximum comprehensive annual profit as the objective functions for the outer layer model, and choosing maximum daily operating profit for the inner layer model, a case study under electricity-hydrogen load is carried out. Then cost reduction scenarios of these two flexibility technologies is depicted, and economic, cleanliness and flexibility indices are designed to compare and evaluate the competitiveness of the two technologies in different conditions. The results show that the proposed optimal configuration method can prominently improve the environmental benefits of the microgrid with less economic cost. At present, compared with P2H technology, storage battery technology has overwhelming advantages, but the former will have greater profit margins and market potential in the future.

[84]
MAIER M, SMITH K, DODWELL J, et al. Mass transport in PEM water electrolysers: a review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(1): 30-56.
[85]
陈鸿琳, 刘新苗, 余浩, 等. 基于近似动态规划的海上风电制氢微网实时能量管理策略[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(12): 94-102.
Abstract
电解水制氢(power-to-hydrogen,PtH)装置耦合海上风电运行,在促进风电消纳的同时可以制备绿色氢能,推进工业领域的无碳化进程,因而备受关注。文章开展海上风电制氢微网的实时能量管理策略研究。首先,构建海上风电制氢微网的实时能量管理模型,包含海上风电、电制氢装置以及储氢罐等元件。然后,提出基于近似动态规划(approximate dynamic programming,ADP)的微网实时能量管理策略,采用分段线性函数近似状态值函数以应对不确定性因素。最后,通过算例验证所提策略的有效性和优越性。在所提策略下,海上风电通过电制氢装置就地消纳,实现氢气的提前制备和存储。以具备精准预测技术的理想算例为基准,所提策略在满足正态分布的实时测试场景下,优化准确率平均值大于99%。
CHEN Honglin, LIU Xinmiao, YU Hao, et al. Real-time energy management strategy based on approximate dynamic programming for offshore wind power-to-hydrogen microgrid[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2022, 43(12): 94-102.

Introducing power-to-hydrogen (PtH) into offshore wind farms can assist the integration of wind power and produce green hydrogen, which accelerates decarbonization in industrial sectors and has attracted attention worldwide. In these circumstances, this paper studies the real-time energy management strategy of the offshore wind PtH microgrid. First, the real-time energy management model of the offshore wind PtH microgrid is proposed, including offshore wind farms, PtH devices and hydrogen storage tanks. Then, real-time energy management strategy based on approximate dynamic programming (ADP) is proposed. The value function is approximated by piece-wise linear functions (PLFs) to cope with uncertainties in the microgrid. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed strategy is verified by case studies. Under the proposed strategy, offshore wind power can be consumed by PtH, achieving production and storage of hydrogen in advance. On the basis of the ideal case with perfect forecasting, the proposed strategy has an average optimization accuracy of more than 99% in real-time test scenarios with normal distribution.

[86]
周涣, 田易之. 光伏-PEM储氢系统建模与仿真[J]. 机床与液压, 2023, 51(2): 180-184.
Abstract
光伏发电存在间歇性的缺点,需要一个可持续的储能系统来满足需求。介绍光伏-PEM(质子交换膜)储氢系统,将电能转化为氢气储存,后期再通过PEM 燃料电池将氢气转化为电能。该系统包含光伏发电系统、PEM制氢电解槽以及燃料电池等,通过电解水产生氢气,氢气在高压下储存在压缩储罐中以备后用,后期系统有需要时,氢气将通过PEM燃料电池重新转化为电能。光伏发电系统的输出电流由PI控制器控制,以稳定电解槽的输入电流。对于光伏-PEM储氢系统,主要问题是对天气条件的依赖。通过系统建模来模拟光伏-PEM储氢系统的运行过程,评估与太阳能光伏输出电流相关的光照强度对氢气生产、氢气储存以及后期氢气再电气化的影响,为后续有助于缓解与太阳能、风力发电和其他间歇性发电相关的储能问题奠定基础。
ZHOU Huan, TIAN Yizhi. Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic-PEM hydrogen storage system[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2023, 51(2): 180-184.
[87]
张开鹏, 杨雪梅, 张宏甜, 等. 考虑“光伏-储能” 耦合参与调峰的配电网氢储能优化配置[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2023, 39(10): 95-103, 112.
ZHANG Kaipeng, YANG Xuemei, ZHANG Hongtian, et al. A study on the optimal configuration of hydrogen energy storage in the distribution network considering “photovoltaic-energy storage” coupling participating and peak shaving[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2023, 39(10): 95-103, 112.
[88]
OJONG E T, KWAN J T H, NOURI-KHORASANI A, et al. Development of an experimentally validated semi-empirical fully-coupled performance model of a PEM electrolysis cell with a 3-D structured porous transport layer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(41): 25831-25847.
[89]
ZHAO D Q, HE Q J, YU J, et al. Dynamic behaviour and control strategy of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells (HT-PEMECs) for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(51): 26613-26622.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFB1506800)
Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China(52110421005H)
PDF(7174 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/