A Review on Modeling of Hydrogen Production System with Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis

doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2024.02.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis is adaptable to power fluctuation owing to its advantages of fast response and wide power adjustment range. It can be used as a flexible and adjustable resource to match the dynamic power grid supply and demand, and improve the penetration of renewable energy. This study summarizes and analyzes the modeling methods and research progress of the PEM water electrolysis system, expounds the basis for selecting parameters, and prospects the improvement direction of the PEM water electrolysis system from four aspects of water, heat, electricity, and gas. The model is an essential tool in the model development of the electrolysis hydrogen production system. In this study, the static performances and dynamic behaviors of the PEM water electrolysis system can be clarified by modeling, which can effectively support the design, operation, and control optimization of the system. This research review has certain theoretical value and guiding significance for the model establishment, development, and simulation analysis of the PEM electrolysis hydrogen production system.

Key words: proton exchange membrane electrolysis hydrogen production, system modeling, electrolyzer modeling, water-heat-electricity-gas

CLC Number:

TK91

SONG Jie, GAO Jie, LIANG Danxi, LI Gendi, DENG Zhanfeng, XU Guizhi, ZHANG Leiqi, XIE Changjun, XU Chao. A Review on Modeling of Hydrogen Production System with Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis[J]. ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 45(2): 58-78.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1 Dynamic characteristic curve of PEM electrolysis hydrogen production system

Fig.2 Schematic of PEM electrolysis cell

Fig.3 Principle of PEM electrolysis hydrogen production system

Fig.4 Structure of PEM hydrogen production electrolysis system

Fig.5 Composition of electrolysis cell operating voltage

Table 1 Value table of exchange current density and charge transfer coefficient in anode and cathode

Table 2 Other voltage models

Table 3 Value table of electric permeability coefficient

Table 4 Value table of porosity

Table 5 Other Membrane hydration models

Fig.6 Hydrogen/oxygen separator model

Fig.7 Heat transfer model with electrolysis as object

Fig.8 Heat transfer model with electrolysis system as the object

Fig.9 Electric model of electrolysis system

Fig.10 Gas flow model of electrolysis system

Fig.11 Model coupling diagram

References 89

[1]	GRIFFITHS S, SOVACOOL B K, KIM J, et al. Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: a critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021, 80: 102208.
[2]	INAL O B, ZINCIR B, DENIZ C. Investigation on the decarbonization of shipping: an approach to hydrogen and ammonia[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(45): 19888-19900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.189 URL
[3]	OLIVEIRA A M, BESWICK R R, YAN Y S. A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2021, 33: 100701. doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2021.100701 URL
[4]	LOTT P, WAGNER U, KOCH T, et al. Hydrogen combustion engines-chances and challenges on the way towards a decarbonized mobility[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2022, 94(3): 217-229. doi: 10.1002/cite.v94.3 URL
[5]	张焱, 郝振波, 朱振涛, 等. 海上风能岸上制氢的经济可行性分析[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(3): 148-154. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.03.015
	ZHANG Yan, HAO Zhenbo, ZHU Zhentao, et al. Economic feasibility analysis of onshore hydrogen production using offshore wind power[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(3): 148-154. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.03.015
[6]	王士博, 孔令国, 蔡国伟, 等. 电力系统氢储能关键应用技术现状、挑战及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(17): 6660-6681.
	WANG Shibo, KONG Lingguo, CAI Guowei, et al. Current status, challenges, and prospects of key application technologies for hydrogen storage in power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(17): 6660-6681.
[7]	李建林, 张则栋, 李光辉, 等. 基于模型层级分析的质子交换膜电解槽建模研究进展[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49(3): 1105-1117.
	LI Jianlin, ZHANG Zedong, LI Guanghui, et al. Research on modeling of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer based on model hierarchical analysis[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2023, 49(3): 1105-1117.
[8]	FALCÃO D S, PINTO A M F R. A review on PEM electrolyzer modelling: guidelines for beginners[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261: 121184. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121184 URL
[9]	OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA P B. Low-temperature electrolysis system modelling: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78: 280-300. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.099 URL
[10]	MAJUMDAR A, HAAS M, ELLIOT I, et al. Control and control-oriented modeling of PEM water electrolyzers: a review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(79): 30621-30641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.204 URL
[11]	吴启亮, 章雷其, 赵波. 可再生能源制氢建模技术研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2023, 42(5): 18-33.
	WU Qiliang, ZHANG Leiqi, ZHAO Bo. A study of the modeling technology of hydrogen production from renewable energy sources[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2023, 42(5): 18-33.
[12]	温昶, 张博涵, 王雅钦, 等. 高效质子交换膜电解水制氢技术研究进展[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(1): 111-122.
	WEN Chang, ZHANG Bohan, WANG Yaqin, et al. Research progress of high efficiency proton exchange membrane water electrolysis technology[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(1): 111-122.
[13]	任和, 刘宏伟, 顾亚京, 等. 基于Hammerstein模型的PEM电解槽动态模型[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2022, 43(9): 2324-2332.
	REN He, LIU Hongwei, GU Yajing, et al. Dynamic modeling of PEM electrolyzer based on Hammerstein model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(9): 2324-2332.
[14]	OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA B. Modelling, simulation and analysis of a PEM electrolysis system[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(12): 1014-1019.
[15]	YAVUZ H. Modelling and simulation of a heaving wave energy converter based PEM hydrogen generation and storage system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(50): 26413-26425. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.099 URL
[16]	GÖßLING S, STYPKA S, BAHR M, et al. Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis modeling for system simulation and degradation analysis[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2018, 90(10): 1437-1442. doi: 10.1002/cite.v90.10 URL
[17]	SUERMANN M, SCHMIDT T J, BÜCHI F N. Cell performance determining parameters in high pressure water electrolysis[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 211: 989-997. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.120 URL
[18]	MORADI NAFCHI F, AFSHARI E, BANIASADI E, et al. A parametric study of polymer membrane electrolyser performance, energy and exergy analyses[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(34): 18662-18670. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.081 URL
[19]	HAN B, MO J K, KANG Z Y, et al. Effects of membrane electrode assembly properties on two-phase transport and performance in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 188: 317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.139 URL
[20]	张顺星, 苑易伟, 胡平, 等. 光伏-PEM直接耦合电解水制氢系统研究[J]. 工业仪表与自动化装置, 2022(3): 49-52.
	ZHANG Shunxing, YUAN Yiwei, HU Ping, et al. Research on photovoltaic-PEM electrolytic water hydrogen direct coupling system[J]. Industrial Instrumentation & Automation, 2022(3): 49-52.
[21]	JING K, LIU C. Online observer of the voltage components of the PEM electrolyzer based on the time-varying linearization of the semi-empirical model[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 299-307.
[22]	SARTORY M, WALLNÖFER-OGRIS E, SALMAN P, et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of an asymmetric high pressure PEM water electrolyser up to 155 bar[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(52): 30493-30508. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.112 URL
[23]	AUBRAS F, DESEURE J, KADJO J J A, et al. Two-dimensional model of low-pressure PEM electrolyser: two-phase flow regime, electrochemical modelling and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(42): 26203-26216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.211 URL
[24]	阮景昕, 王跃社, 张俊峰, 等. 基于氢储能的风光氢能源系统能质转换优化策略[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44(2): 413-421.
	RUAN Jingxin, WANG Yueshe, ZHANG Junfeng, et al. Energy-mass conersion optimization strategy of wind-solar-hydrogen energy system based on hydrogen energy storage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2023, 44(2): 413-421.
[25]	CHEN Q, WANG Y, YANG F, et al. Two-dimensional multi-physics modeling of porous transport layer in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer for water splitting[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(58): 32984-32994. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.148 URL
[26]	陈锦洲, 林飞, 何洪文, 等. 质子交换膜燃料电池/电解槽系统建模及负荷追踪策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(S2): 636-643.
	CHEN Jinzhou, LIN Fei, HE Hongwen, et al. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell/electrolyzer hybrid power system modeling and load tracking strategy[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(S2): 636-643.
[27]	FOLGADO F J, GONZÁLEZ I, CALDERÓN A J. Simulation platform for the assessment of PEM electrolyzer models oriented to implement digital Replicas[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 267: 115917. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115917 URL
[28]	TIJANI A S, BINTI KAMARUDIN N A, BINTI MAZLAN F A. Investigation of the effect of charge transfer coefficient (CTC) on the operating voltage of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(19): 9119-9132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.111 URL
[29]	SANTARELLI M G, TORCHIO M F. Experimental analysis of the effects of the operating variables on the performance of a single PEMFC[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007, 48(1): 40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.013 URL
[30]	MARANGIO F, SANTARELLI M, CALÌ M. Theoretical model and experimental analysis of a high pressure PEM water electrolyser for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(3): 1143-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.083 URL
[31]	ABDIN Z, WEBB C J, GRAY E M. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(39): 13243-13257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.129 URL
[32]	YIGIT T, SELAMET O F. Mathematical modeling and dynamic Simulink simulation of high-pressure PEM electrolyzer system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(32): 13901-13914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.022 URL
[33]	BERNARDI D M, VERBRUGGE M W. Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte[J]. AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(8): 1151-1163. doi: 10.1002/aic.v37:8 URL
[34]	LEE J, ALAM A, JU H. Multidimensional and transient modeling of an alkaline water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(26): 13678-13690. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.133 URL
[35]	WANG Q Q, TANG F M, LI B, et al. Numerical analysis of static and dynamic heat transfer behaviors inside proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 488: 229419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229419 URL
[36]	FERREIRA R B, FALCÃO D S, PINTO A M F R. Simulation of membrane chemical degradation in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell by computational fluid dynamics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(1): 1106-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.179 URL
[37]	TOGHYANI S, FAKHRADINI S, AFSHARI E, et al. Optimization of operating parameters of a polymer exchange membrane electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(13): 6403-6414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.186 URL
[38]	TSUKAMOTO T, AOKI T, KANESAKA H, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of full-scale proton exchange membrane fuel cells at high current densities[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 488: 229412. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229412 URL
[39]	AGBLI K S, PÉRA M C, HISSEL D, et al. Multiphysics simulation of a PEM electrolyser: energetic macroscopic representation approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(2): 1382-1398. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.10.069 URL
[40]	CHOI P, BESSARABOV D G, DATTA R. A simple model for solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) water electrolysis[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 175(1/2/3/4): 535-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.01.076 URL
[41]	HWANG J J, LAI L K, WU W, et al. Dynamic modeling of a photovoltaic hydrogen fuel cell hybrid system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(23): 9531-9542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.100 URL
[42]	POLVERINO P, PIANESE C. Model-based prognostic algorithm for online RUL estimation of PEMFCs[C]// 2016 3rd Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol). IEEE, 2016: 599-604.
[43]	MARR C, LI X. An engineering model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance[J]. ARI - an International Journal for Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1997, 50(4): 190-200. doi: 10.1007/s007770050014 URL
[44]	NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(10): 2748-2756. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.018 URL
[45]	HARRISON K W, HERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO E, MANN M, et al. Semiempirical model for determining PEM electrolyzer stack characteristics[J]. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2006, 3(2): 220-223. doi: 10.1115/1.2174072 URL
[46]	HERNÁNDEZ-GÓMEZ Á, RAMIREZ V, GUILBERT D, et al. Development of an adaptive static-dynamic electrical model based on input electrical energy for PEM water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 18817-18830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.182 URL
[47]	HERNÁNDEZ-GÓMEZ Á, RAMIREZ V, GUILBERT D, et al. Cell voltage static-dynamic modeling of a PEM electrolyzer based on adaptive parameters: development and experimental validation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163: 1508-1522. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.106 URL
[48]	RAKOUSKY C, REIMER U, WIPPERMANN K, et al. Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 342: 38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.118 URL
[49]	苏昕, 徐立军, 胡兵. 考虑多变量因素影响的光伏PEM制氢系统建模与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 521-529. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0168
	SU Xin, XU Lijun, HU Bing. Modelling and analysis of photovoltaic pem hydrogen production system considering multivariable factors[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 521-529. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0168
[50]	ZAWODZINSKI T A Jr, NEEMAN M, SILLERUD L O, et al. Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1991, 95(15): 6040-6044. doi: 10.1021/j100168a060 URL
[51]	ZAWODZINSKI T A, DAVEY J, VALERIO J, et al. The water content dependence of electro-osmotic drag in proton-conducting polymer electrolytes[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 1995, 40(3): 297-302. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)00277-8 URL
[52]	周嫣. 质子交换膜燃料电池建模与动态响应仿真分析[J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2022(14): 113-117.
	ZHOU Yan. Modeling and dynamic response simulation analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, 2022(14): 113-117.
[53]	ATLAM Ö, DÜNDAR G. A practical equivalent electrical circuit model for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(24): 13230-13239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.108 URL
[54]	LEBBAL M E, LECŒUCHE S. Identification and monitoring of a PEM electrolyser based on dynamical modelling[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(14): 5992-5999. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.003 URL
[55]	RUUSKANEN V, KOPONEN J, HUOMAN K, et al. PEM water electrolyzer model for a power-hardware-in-loop simulator[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16): 10775-10784. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.046 URL
[56]	KAYA M F, DEMIR N. Numerical investigation of PEM water electrolysis performance for different oxygen evolution electrocatalysts[J]. Fuel Cells, 2017, 17(1): 37-47. doi: 10.1002/fuce.v17.1 URL
[57]	OLIVIER P, BOURASSEAU C, BOUAMAMA B. Dynamic and multiphysic PEM electrolysis system modelling: a bond graph approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(22): 14872-14904. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.002 URL
[58]	SHEN M Z, BENNETT N, DING Y L, et al. A concise model for evaluating water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(22): 14335-14341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.029 URL
[59]	AOUALI F Z, BECHERIF M, RAMADAN H S, et al. Analytical modelling and experimental validation of proton exchange membrane electrolyser for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(2): 1366-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.101 URL
[60]	BIAKU C Y, DALE N V, MANN M D, et al. A semiempirical study of the temperature dependence of the anode charge transfer coefficient of a 6 kW PEM electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(16): 4247-4254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.006 URL
[61]	SÁNCHEZ M, AMORES E, ABAD D, et al. Aspen Plus model of an alkaline electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(7): 3916-3929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.027 URL
[62]	WANG J T, YUAN J L, SUNDEN B. Modeling of inhomogeneous compression effects of porous GDL on transport phenomena and performance in PEM fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2017, 41(7): 985-1003. doi: 10.1002/er.v41.7 URL
[63]	KHAN M J, IQBAL M T. Modelling and analysis of electro-chemical, thermal, and reactant flow dynamics for a PEM fuel cell system[J]. Fuel Cells, 2005, 5(4): 463-475. doi: 10.1002/fuce.v5:4 URL
[64]	SAEED E W, WARKOZEK E G. Modeling and analysis of renewable PEM fuel cell system[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 74: 87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.527 URL
[65]	陈建业. 非并网风电制氢系统建模与控制研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2022.
	CHEN Jianye. Research on modeling and control of non-grid-connected wind power hydrogen production system[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[66]	ABOMAZID A M, EL-TAWEEL N A, FARAG H E Z. Novel analytical approach for parameters identification of PEM electrolyzer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(9): 5870-5881. doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3132941 URL
[67]	LEE W K, SHIMPALEE S, VAN ZEE J W. Verifying predictions of water and current distributions in a serpentine flow field polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2003, 150(3): A341. doi: 10.1149/1.1545455 URL
[68]	AWASTHI A, SCOTT K, BASU S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(22): 14779-14786. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.045 URL
[69]	密路祥. 风电电解水制氢系统的电解特性的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
	MI Luxiang. Study on electrolytic characteristics of hydrogen production system by water electrolysis of wind power[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021.
[70]	HERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO E, SINGH D, HUTTON P N, et al. A macro-level model for determining the performance characteristics of solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 138(1/2): 174-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.051 URL
[71]	ZHU H Y, KEE R J. A general mathematical model for analyzing the performance of fuel-cell membrane-electrode assemblies[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 117(1/2): 61-74. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00358-6 URL
[72]	MEDINA P, SANTARELLI M. Analysis of water transport in a high pressure PEM electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(11): 5173-5186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.130 URL
[73]	LI X J, QU S G, YU H M, et al. Membrane water-flow rate in electrolyzer cells with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE)[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 190(2): 534-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.147 URL
[74]	GARCÍA-VALVERDE R, ESPINOSA N, URBINA A. Simple PEM water electrolyser model and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1927-1938. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.027 URL
[75]	FRAGIACOMO P, GENOVESE M. Modeling and energy demand analysis of a scalable green hydrogen production system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(57): 30237-30255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.186 URL
[76]	ZHAO D Q, HE Q J, YU J, et al. A data-driven digital-twin model and control of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(14): 8687-8699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.233 URL
[77]	ESPINOSA-LÓPEZ M, DARRAS C, POGGI P, et al. Modelling and experimental validation of a 46 kW PEM high pressure water electrolyzer[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 119: 160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.081 URL
[78]	YANG B, LI J L, LI Y L, et al. A critical survey of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system control: summaries, advances, and perspectives[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(17): 9986-10020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.065 URL
[79]	WANG Y X, CHEN Q, OU K, et al. Time delay thermal control of a compact proton exchange membrane fuel cell against disturbances and noisy measurements[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 244: 114444. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114444 URL
[80]	YUAN Z, WANG W Q, HE S, et al. Interval-based LQR strategy for optimal control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system with interval uncertainties[J]. ISA Transactions, 2020, 100: 334-345. doi: S0019-0578(19)30496-3 pmid: 31791614
[81]	闫庆友, 史超凡, 秦光宇, 等. 基于近端策略优化算法的电化学/氢混合储能系统双层配置及运行优化[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(8): 22-32. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.08.003
	YAN Qingyou, SHI Chaofan, QIN Guangyu, et al. Research on two-layer configuration and operation optimization based on proximal policy optimization for electrochemical/hydrogen hybrid energy storage system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2022, 43(8): 22-32. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.08.003
[82]	贺旭辉, 王灿, 李欣然, 等. 计及CLHG-SOFC碳捕集的多能源系统低碳优化调度[J]. 智慧电力, 2023, 51(5): 57-64.
	HE Xuhui, WANG Can, LI Xinran, et al. Low carbon optimal scheduling of multi-energy system considering CLHG-SOFC carbon capture[J]. Smart Power, 2023, 51(5): 57-64.
[83]	檀勤良, 单子婧, 丁毅宏, 等. 考虑蓄电池与电制氢的多能源微网灵活性资源配置双层优化模型[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(2): 38-49. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.02.004
	TAN Qinliang, SHAN Zijing, DING Yihong, et al. Bi-level optimal configuration for flexible resources of multi-energy microgrid considering storage battery and P2H[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(2): 38-49. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2023.02.004
[84]	MAIER M, SMITH K, DODWELL J, et al. Mass transport in PEM water electrolysers: a review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(1): 30-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.013 URL
[85]	陈鸿琳, 刘新苗, 余浩, 等. 基于近似动态规划的海上风电制氢微网实时能量管理策略[J]. 电力建设, 2022, 43(12): 94-102. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.12.010
	CHEN Honglin, LIU Xinmiao, YU Hao, et al. Real-time energy management strategy based on approximate dynamic programming for offshore wind power-to-hydrogen microgrid[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2022, 43(12): 94-102. doi: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.12.010
[86]	周涣, 田易之. 光伏-PEM储氢系统建模与仿真[J]. 机床与液压, 2023, 51(2): 180-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2023.02.029
	ZHOU Huan, TIAN Yizhi. Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic-PEM hydrogen storage system[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2023, 51(2): 180-184.
[87]	张开鹏, 杨雪梅, 张宏甜, 等. 考虑“光伏-储能” 耦合参与调峰的配电网氢储能优化配置[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2023, 39(10): 95-103, 112.
	ZHANG Kaipeng, YANG Xuemei, ZHANG Hongtian, et al. A study on the optimal configuration of hydrogen energy storage in the distribution network considering “photovoltaic-energy storage” coupling participating and peak shaving[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2023, 39(10): 95-103, 112.
[88]	OJONG E T, KWAN J T H, NOURI-KHORASANI A, et al. Development of an experimentally validated semi-empirical fully-coupled performance model of a PEM electrolysis cell with a 3-D structured porous transport layer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(41): 25831-25847. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.183 URL
[89]	ZHAO D Q, HE Q J, YU J, et al. Dynamic behaviour and control strategy of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells (HT-PEMECs) for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(51): 26613-26622. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.155 URL