Optimization Strategy for Battery Swapping Station Scheduling Considering Coupling of Power Market and New Energy Source

WANG Yongli, ZHU Mingyang, ZHANG Yunfei, DONG Huanran, JIANG Sichong, LI Dexin, ZHU Jinrong, GUI Jiangyi

Electric Power Construction ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 38-48.

PDF(1989 KB)
PDF(1989 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 38-48. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2025.06.004
Key Technologies for Optimal Operation and Scheduling of New Energy Vehicles Based on Artificial Intelligence·Hosted by YANG Bo, YAO Wei, JIANG Lin and YANG Qiang·

Optimization Strategy for Battery Swapping Station Scheduling Considering Coupling of Power Market and New Energy Source

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] To fully exploit the flexible and adjustable potential of the charging load of a taxi battery swapping station, a charging optimization scheduling strategy is proposed. This strategy aims to ease the conflict between the charging load, peak and valley pressures on the power grid, and new energy consumption. It considers the coupling between the power market and new energy sources. [Methods] The strategy is based on two main goals: providing auxiliary services in the power market and addressing the abandonment and consumption of new energy. A coordinated operation framework is constructed, linking battery swapping stations, power grids, and new energy stations. An optimization mechanism is designed, incorporating peak response, time-of-use tariff matching, and dynamic tracking of battery SOC. Taking 96 time slots as the scheduling granularity, a dual-objective model—maximizing economic benefits and optimizing new energy consumption—was established, and an improved Harris Hawk optimization algorithm was introduced to solve the problem. [Results] Results from a case study show that the proposed strategy increases the economic benefit of the battery swapping station by 25%. It also raises new energy consumption by 16.5%. Additionally, the charging load during grid peak hours is significantly reduced. This helps achieve peak shaving and valley filling. [Conclusions] By dynamically matching new energy abandonment with time-of-use tariffs, the proposed strategy enhances both economic efficiency and the station's ability to consume new energy. It also reduces grid pressure during peak periods. The proposed market-new energy synergy framework offers a new approach for battery swapping stations to participate in power system regulation.

Key words

power exchange stations / charging optimization strategy / new energy consumption / electricity market

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Yongli , ZHU Mingyang , ZHANG Yunfei , et al . Optimization Strategy for Battery Swapping Station Scheduling Considering Coupling of Power Market and New Energy Source[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2025, 46(6): 38-48 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2025.06.004

References

[1]
LI G J, LUO T, SONG Y Q. Climate change mitigation efficiency of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China: from the perspective of energy transition and circular economy[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 179: 106048.
[2]
国务院新闻办. 国务院新闻办发布会介绍2023年工业和信息化发展情况[EB/OL].(2024-01-19)[2024-04-10]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202401/content_6927371.htm.
State Council Information Office. State Council Information Office Conference on the development of industry and informatisation in 2023[EB/OL]. (2024-01-19)[2024-04-10]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202401/content_6927371.htm.
[3]
CUI D S, WANG Z P, LIU P, et al. Operation optimization approaches of electric vehicle battery swapping and charging station: a literature review[J]. Energy, 2023, 263: 126095.
[4]
胡珏, 韦钢, 袁洪涛, 等. 电动汽车充换储一体站的建模[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41(6): 44-51.
Abstract
电动汽车充换储一体站是集充电站、换电站和梯级储能电站于一体的电动汽车(electric vehicle ,EV)集中型综合供储能电站,可以发挥充电站和换电站的可调度潜力,并能够减小功率波动。提出了一种新型电动汽车充换储一体站模型,该模型综合考虑了电动汽车快充站、换电站和梯级储能电站。首先,基于快充用户的行驶行为特点,建立了电动汽车快充站模型;其次,根据城市道路速度流量实用模型,建立了电动汽车换电站模型;最后,结合梯级储能模型,构建了集成的电动汽车充换储一体站模型。以某地区公交线路实际道路情况为仿真算例,验证了提出的一体站模型能够满足电动汽车充电负荷的需求,且具有降低运维成本和抑制功率波动的优势。
HU Jue, WEI Gang, YUAN Hongtao, et al. Modeling of EV charging-swapping-storage integrated station[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2020, 41(6): 44-51.
The electric vehicle (EV) charging-swapping-storage integrated station (CSSIS) is an electric vehicle centralized integrated energy storage and power station that integrates charging stations, power conversion stations and cascade energy storage power stations, which can reduce system power fluctuations. This paper proposes a model of electric vehicle CSSIS considering fast charging station, battery swapping station and cascade energy storage station. Firstly, according to the behavior characteristics of fast-charging users, a model of EV fast charging station is established. Secondly, on the basis of speed-flow practical model of city roads, a model of EV battery swapping station is established. Finally, combined with the cascade energy storage model, an integrated electric vehicle CSSIS model is constructed. Taking the actual road conditions of bus lines in a city into account, a case verifies that the integrated station model proposed in this paper can meet the demand of electric vehicle charging load, and has the advantages of reducing the daily total operation cost and suppressing power fluctuation.
[5]
黄敏丽, 于艾清. 基于改进布谷鸟算法的电动汽车换电站有序充电策略研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(4): 1075-1083, 1284.
HUANG Minli, YU Aiqing. Study on coordinated charging strategy for battery swapping station based on improved cuckoo search algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(4): 1075-1083, 1284.
[6]
林湘宁, 王伟名, 随权, 等. 主动配电网-充换电站群-智慧社区群分层优化调度策略[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37(10): 25-37.
LIN Xiangning, WANG Weiming, SUI Quan, et al. Hierarchical optimal scheduling strategy for active power distribution network, charging and switching station cluster and smart community cluster[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37(10): 25-37.
[7]
王伟杰, 黄海宇, 徐远途, 等. 电动汽车参与主动配电网电压调控的策略研究[J]. 广东电力, 2023, 36(10): 93-104.
WANG Weijie, HUANG Haiyu, XU Yuantu, et al. Strategy research on electric vehicles participating in active distribution network voltage regulation[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2023, 36(10): 93-104.
[8]
程慧琳, 武剑, 张晶, 等. 计及电动汽车充放电时空分布的输配网协同降损低碳策略研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2024, 61(11): 122-132.
CHENG Huilin, WU Jian, ZHANG Jing, et al. Research on the low-carbon strategy of coordinated loss reduction of transmission and distribution network considering the temporal-spatial distribution of EV charging and discharging[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2024, 61(11): 122-132.
[9]
张文昕, 栗然, 臧向迪, 等. 基于强化学习的电动汽车换电站实时调度策略优化[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(10): 134-141.
ZHANG Wenxin, LI Ran, ZANG Xiangdi, et al. Real-time scheduling strategy optimization for electric vehicle battery swapping station based on reinforcement learning[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(10): 134-141.
[10]
文艺林, 胡泽春, 宁剑, 等. 基于分布鲁棒机会约束的充电运营商参与调峰市场投标策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(7): 23-32.
WEN Yilin, HU Zechun, NING Jian, et al. Bidding strategy of charging operator participating in peak regulation market based on distributionally robust chance constraint[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(7): 23-32.
[11]
NAYAK D S, MISRA S. An operational scheduling framework for electric vehicle battery swapping station under demand uncertainty[J]. Energy, 2024, 290: 130219.
[12]
庞松岭, 赵海龙, 张晨佳. 计及充电需求差异的电动汽车充电设施协同优化配置[J]. 电测与仪表, 2024, 61(12): 171-177.
PANG Songling, ZHAO Hailong, ZHANG Chenjia. Collaborative optimization configuration of electric vehicle charging facilities considering differences in charging demand[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2024, 61(12): 171-177.
[13]
李慧玲, 王维军, 廖亚特, 等. 基于电动汽车充电管理的村级光伏发电系统公用储能配置优化研究[J]. 广东电力, 2023, 36(12): 30-38.
LI Huiling, WANG Weijun, LIAO Yate, et al. Optimization study of public energy storage configuration for village photovoltaic power generation system based on electric vehicle charging management[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2023, 36(12): 30-38.
[14]
刘秀兰, 陈熙, 张倩, 等. 充电桩充电模块功率器件故障诊断研究综述[J]. 高压电器, 2024, 60(7): 191-200.
LIU Xiulan, CHEN Xi, ZHANG Qian, et al. Review of power device fault diagnosis for charging module of charging pile[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2024, 60(7): 191-200.
[15]
王子奇, 侯思祖, 郭威. 考虑库存电池的光储换电站优化充电策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(10): 142-148, 176.
WANG Ziqi, HOU Sizu, GUO Wei. Optimal charging strategy of PV-BESS-based battery swapping station considering inventory batteries[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(10): 142-148, 176.
[16]
程杉, 杨堃, 汪业乔, 等. 含风力发电的电动汽车充电站区间优化调度[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2021, 25(6): 101-109.
CHENG Shan, YANG Kun, WANG Yeqiao, et al. Interval optimization scheduling of electric vehicle charging station including wind power generation[J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2021, 25(6): 101-109.
[17]
周星月, 黄向敏, 张勇军, 等. 基于需求响应潜力模糊评估的电动汽车实时调控优化模型[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(10): 30-37.
ZHOU Xingyue, HUANG Xiangmin, ZHANG Yongjun, et al. Real-time scheduling and optimization model of electric vehicles based on fuzzy evaluation of demand response potential[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(10): 30-37.
[18]
杨景旭, 张勇军. 基于有序充电启动机制和补贴机制的充电负荷接纳能力优化[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(11): 122-130.
YANG Jingxu, ZHANG Yongjun. Optimization of charging load acceptance capacity based on ordered charging start-up mechanism and subsidy mechanism[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(11): 122-130.
[19]
赵显秋, 徐青山, 杨永标, 等. 考虑不确定性的新型电池充换电站多时间尺度能量管理策略[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(3): 1007-1017.
ZHAO Xianqiu, XU Qingshan, YANG Yongbiao, et al. Multi-time scale energy management strategy of new battery charging and replacing power station considering uncertainty[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(3): 1007-1017.
[20]
杨康, 石璐杉, 周航, 等. 含电动汽车集群的微电网多时间尺度优化调度[J]. 分布式能源, 2024, 9(3): 21-30.
YANG Kang, SHI Lushan, ZHOU Hang, et al. Multi-time scale optimization scheduling for microgrids containing electric vehicle clusters[J]. Distributed Energy, 2024, 9(3): 21-30.
[21]
陈文颖, 刘蓓迪. 基于粒子群算法的电动汽车有序充放电优化[J]. 山东电力技术, 2023, 50(1): 52-58.
CHEN Wenying, LIU Beidi. Sequential charging and discharging optimization of electric vehicles based on particle swarm optimization[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2023, 50(1): 52-58.
[22]
罗红梅, 张祥成, 李媛媛, 等. 考虑充放电策略的风电-碳捕集-充换电站虚拟电厂低碳经济调度[J]. 现代电力, 2025, 42(1): 54-63.
LUO Hongmei, ZHANG Xiangcheng, LI Yuanyuan, et al. Low-carbon economic dispatching of virtual power plant of wind power-carbon capture-charging power station considering charge and discharge strategy[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2025, 42(1): 54-63.
[23]
粟世玮, 杨玄, 曹申, 等. 考虑新能源消纳的电动汽车有序充电研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 84-89.
SU Shiwei, YANG Xuan, CAO Shen, et al. Research on coordinated charging for electric vehicles considering new energy accommodation[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 41(5): 84-89.
[24]
黄景光, 郑钦杰, 林湘宁, 等. 电动汽车与风电协同入网的双层优化策略[J]. 可再生能源, 2021, 39(4): 514-520.
HUANG Jingguang, ZHENG Qinjie, LIN Xiangning, et al. A bi-layer optimal strategy of electric vehicle and wind power collaborative access to the grid[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2021, 39(4): 514-520.
[25]
MENG W Q, SONG D R, HUANG L S, et al. Distributed energy management of electric vehicle charging stations based on hierarchical pricing mechanism and aggregate feasible regions[J]. Energy, 2024, 291: 130332.
[26]
孙大雁, 史新红, 冯树海, 等. 全国统一电力市场环境下的电力辅助服务市场体系设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(4): 13-24.
SUN Dayan, SHI Xinhong, FENG Shuhai, et al. Design of auxiliary service market system under national unified electricity market[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(4): 13-24.
[27]
高爽, 戴如鑫. 电动汽车集群参与调频辅助服务市场的充电调控策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47(18): 60-67.
GAO Shuang, DAI Ruxin. Charging control strategy for electric vehicle aggregation participating in frequency regulation ancillary service market[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47(18): 60-67.
[28]
黄伟, 叶波. 综合能源系统环境下电动汽车分群优化调度[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42(4): 27-39.
Abstract
电动汽车(electric vehicles, EV)的大规模接入,给综合能源系统调度带来了机遇和挑战。文章考虑电-热-气混合潮流和电动汽车的调度灵活性,建立了含电动汽车的综合能源系统两层嵌套调度模型,对电动汽车进行分群分层调度,合理制定每辆汽车的充放电策略。调度计划层以调度方案成本最小、能量波动最小和环保性最优为目标函数,采用改进的多目标粒子群优化(multi-objective particle swarm optimization, MOPSO)算法求解日前调度计划。EV调度层以用户满意度为目标,采用粒子群(particle swarm optimization, PSO)算法制定出各集群的充放电计划,集群内根据动态优先级制定每辆EV的充放电策略。算例分析表明,所建立的调度模型可有效求解含电动汽车的综合能源系统调度问题,且计算维度小、速度快,具有实用性。
HUANG Wei, YE Bo. Optimal scheduling of electric vehicle clusters in integrated energy system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2021, 42(4): 27-39.

Large-scale electric vehicles (EV) accessing to the system brings opportunities and challenges to the scheduling of integrated energy system. With the power-heat-gas multi-energy flow and the scheduling flexibility of electric vehicles taken into consideration, this paper establishes a two-level scheduling model for integrated energy system with electric vehicles, performing grouped and hierarchical scheduling to make a rational charge-discharge strategy for each EV. Minimum scheduling plan cost, the smallest energy fluctuation and the best environmental protection are taken as objective functions in the scheduling plan level. Improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is adopted to solve the day-ahead scheduling plan. The EV scheduling level uses particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to make the charge-discharge plan of each EV cluster with the goal of user satisfaction. According to the dynamic priority, the charge-discharge strategy of each EV in the cluster is solved. The analysis of case shows that the established scheduling model can effectively solve the scheduling problem of integrated energy system with electric vehicles, which has less calculation dimension, shorter simulation time and better practicality.

[29]
曾宪锴, 杨苹, 刘璐瑶, 等. 电力现货市场环境下电动汽车充换电站的优化调控策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(10): 38-45.
ZENG Xiankai, YANG Ping, LIU Luyao, et al. Optimal regulation strategy of battery charging and swapping station for electric vehicles under electricity spot market environment[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(10): 38-45.
[30]
李咸善, 詹梓澳, 李飞, 等. 考虑换电需求响应的换电站参与电能量-调频市场竞价策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(8): 207-215.
LI Xianshan, ZHAN Ziao, LI Fei, et al. Bidding strategy for battery swapping station participating in electricity energy and frequency regulation market considering demand response of battery swapping[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(8): 207-215.
[31]
沙广林, 刘璐, 马春艳, 等. 考虑车网互动的电动汽车有序充电策略[J]. 供用电, 2023, 40(10): 46-54.
SHA Guanglin, LIU Lu, MA Chunyan, et al. Orderly charging strategy for electric vehicles considering the vehicle-network interaction[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2023, 40(10): 46-54.
[32]
侯慧, 何梓姻, 罗超, 等. 计及需求响应潜力的电动汽车聚合商多主体日前投标策略[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2024, 7(2): 220-227.
HOU Hui, HE Ziyin, LUO Chao, et al. Multi-agent day-ahead bidding strategy of electric vehicle aggregators upon demand response potential[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2024, 7(2): 220-227.
[33]
杨景旭, 唐渊, 姚蓝霓, 等. 考虑服务能力和削峰任务约束的换电站削峰方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022,46(15:29-36)
YANG Jingxu, TANG Yuan, YAO Lanni, et al. Peak-shavingmethod for battery swap station considering service capacity and peak-shaving task constraints[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(15):29-36.
[34]
詹祥澎, 杨军, 韩思宁, 等. 考虑电动汽车可调度潜力的充电站两阶段市场投标策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(10): 86-96.
ZHAN Xiangpeng, YANG Jun, HAN Sining, et al. Two-stage market bidding strategy of charging station considering schedulable potential capacity of electric vehicle[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(10): 86-96.
[35]
CHEN X J, YANG Y, WANG J X, et al. Battery valuation and management for battery swapping station[J]. Energy, 2023, 279:128120.
[36]
庞松岭, 赵雨楠, 张瑞恩, 等. 市场环境下计及用户响应的电动汽车充电站优化运行策略[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(10): 59-68.
PANG Songling, ZHAO Yunan, ZHANG Ruien, et al. The optimal operation strategy of electric vehicle charging stations considering user response in market environment[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(10): 59-68.
[37]
李恒杰, 夏强强, 史一炜, 等. 考虑目标充电站选择冲突的电动汽车充电引导策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(5): 68-74.
LI Hengjie, XIA Qiangqiang, SHI Yiwei, et al. Electric vehicle charging guidance strategy considering selection conflict of target charging stations[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(5): 68-74.
[38]
HEIDARI A A, MIRJALILI S, FARIS H, et al. Harris Hawks optimization: algorithm and applications[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 97: 849-872.
In this paper, a novel population-based, nature-inspired optimization paradigm is proposed, which is called Harris Hawks Optimizer (HHO). The main inspiration of HHO is the cooperative behavior and chasing style of Harris' hawks in nature called surprise pounce. In this intelligent strategy, several hawks cooperatively pounce a prey from different directions in an attempt to surprise it. Harris hawks can reveal a variety of chasing patterns based on the dynamic nature of scenarios and escaping patterns of the prey. This work mathematically mimics such dynamic patterns and behaviors to develop an optimization algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed HHO optimizer is checked, through a comparison with other nature-inspired techniques, on 29 benchmark problems and several real-world engineering problems. The statistical results and comparisons show that the HHO algorithm provides very promising and occasionally competitive results compared to well-established metaheuristic techniques. Source codes of HHO are publicly available at http://www.alimirjalili.com/HHO.html and http://www.evo-ml.com/2019/03/02/hho. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V.
[39]
黄霖, 符强, 童楠. 基于自适应调整哈里斯鹰优化算法求解机器人路径规划问题[J]. 计算机应用, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3847.
Abstract
针对启发式算法在机器人路径规划过程中存在路径长度不稳定和易陷入局部极小点的问题,提出一种基于自适应调整哈里斯鹰优化(AAHHO)算法。首先,利用收敛因子调整策略,调节全局搜索阶段和局部搜索阶段的平衡,同时利用自然常数为底数,提高搜索效率和收敛精度;其次,在全局搜索阶段,采用精英合作引导搜索策略,通过3个精英哈里斯鹰合作引导其他个体更新位置以提高搜索性能,通过3个最优位置加强种群间的信息交流;最后,通过模拟种内竞争策略增强哈里斯鹰跳出局部最优的能力。函数测试和机器人路径规划对比实验结果表明,所提算法无论是函数测试还是机器人路径规划都优于IHHO(Improve Harris Hawk Optimization)和CHHO(Chaotic Harris Hawk Optimization)等对比算法,对于求解机器人的路径规划具有较好的有效性、可行性和稳定性。
HUANG Lin, FU Qiang, TONG Nan. Solving robot path planning problem by adaptively adjusted Harris hawk optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3847.

Aiming at the problem that the heuristic algorithms have unstable path lengths and are easy to fall into local minimum in the process of robot path planning, an Adaptively Adjusted Harris Hawk Optimization (AAHHO) algorithm was proposed. Firstly, the convergence factor adjustment strategy was used to adjust the balance between the global search stage and the local search stage, and the natural constant was used as the base to improve the search efficiency and convergence accuracy. Then, in the global search phase, the elite cooperation guided search strategy was adopted, by three elite Harris hawks cooperatively guiding other individuals to update the positions, so that the search performance was enhanced, and the information exchange among the populations was enhanced through the three optimal positions. Finally, by simulating the intraspecific competition strategy, the ability of the Harris hawks to jump out of the local optimum was improved. The comparative experimental results of function testing and robot path planning show that the proposed algorithm is superior to comparison algorithms such as IHHO(Improve Harris Hawk Optimization) and CHHO(Chaotic Harris Hawk Optimization), in both function testing and path planning, and it has better effectiveness, feasibility and stability in robot path planning.

[40]
TANYILDIZI E, DEMIR G. Golden sine algorithm: a novel math-inspired algorithm[J]. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017, 17(2): 71-78.
[41]
逯苗, 何登旭, 曲良东. 非线性参数的精英学习灰狼优化算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(4): 55-67.
LU Miao, HE Dengxu, QU Liangdong. Grey wolf optimization algorithm based on elite learning for nonlinear parameters[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 39(4): 55-67.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(72371101)
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Program of the Ministry Education(22YJA630093)
Science and Technology Program of State Grid Jilin Electric Power Company Limited(B32342210003)
PDF(1989 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/