PDF(2465 KB)
Data-Driven Identification of Critical Nodes and Prediction of Disturbance Propagation
WU Qian, ZHANG Dongxia, LONG Wangcheng, WANG Ning, RAO Jianye
Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 39-48.
PDF(2465 KB)
PDF(2465 KB)
Data-Driven Identification of Critical Nodes and Prediction of Disturbance Propagation
[Objective] Power system data demonstrates features of high stochasticity, strong interaction, and multi-dimensional coupling. Traditional mechanistic modeling and simulation analyses, which rely on conditional assumptions and model simplifications, fail to meet the real-time defense requirements of large-scale power grids in terms of timeliness. By fully leveraging wide-area spatiotemporal sequence information from power grids, we can enhance analysis accuracy and timeliness while transcending the limitations of mechanistic models. This approach enables multi-level situational awareness of the physical operational states of power systems, facilitating more effective real-time defense strategies. [Methods] This paper presents a method to promote the safe and stable operation of the power grid. Based on the dynamic characteristics of the power grid, the spatiotemporal data are analyzed and excavated by random matrix theory. This method overcomes the limitations of the traditional grid-based physical topology, realizing the real-time assessment and identification of critical nodes in the system. According to assessment results of critical nodes, the disturbance propagation is predicted based on data-driven Markov chain. The method achieves the personalized risk assessment of grid nodes and collective predictive analysis of grid situations. [Results] This paper focuses on personalized risk assessment of nodes in the power grid, identifying risk nodes or key nodes in the system. By using the method proposed in this paper to explore the transition from monitoring and warning to predictive warning. The effectiveness and rationality of the proposed method can be verified through case analysis by using Markov chain to predict the propagation of disturbances relative to disturbed nodes. This study enables early warning of the disturbance propagation when the power grid disturbance occurs, and focuses on the critical nodes that will cause serious accidents in advance. Compared with other identification methods, the proposed approach takes into account both the electrical characteristics and topological properties of the system, with its identification results dynamically adapting to changes in system operating conditions. [Conclusions] Prevention and control are conducted in advance to ensure the safe and stable operation of the system, which is of great significance to the defense of blackouts.
data mining / stochastic matrix / critical nodes / disturbance propagation
| [1] |
王锡凡. 现代电力系统分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
|
| [2] |
艾渊, 杨昊, 杨晓华, 等. 面向新型电力系统N-1静态安全评估的深度时空数据驱动模型研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62(11): 103-110.
|
| [3] |
王伟胜, 林伟芳, 何国庆, 等. 美国得州2021年大停电事故对我国新能源发展的启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(12): 4033-4043.
|
| [4] |
陈星霖, 邵光正, 童凡杰, 等. 基于“情景-应对”的城市大面积停电应急联动机制与策略[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2023, 25(3): 99-105.
|
| [5] |
刘道伟, 李柏青, 邵广惠, 等. 基于大数据及人工智能的大电网智能调控系统框架[J]. 电力信息与通信技术, 2019, 17(3): 14-21.
|
| [6] |
韩广炀, 孙贤明, 耿俊琪, 等. 基于改进盈利主导者算法的电网脆弱线路辨识[J]. 供用电, 2025, 42(3): 68-75, 85.
|
| [7] |
刘文霞, 刘岩东, 李承泽, 等. 基于随机优化的城市供电网络拓扑场景集合建模与关键节点辨识[J/OL]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2024:1-20.(2024-09-13) [2025-09-11] https://link.cnki.net/urlid/13.1212.tm.20240912.1803.002.
|
| [8] |
鞠文云, 李银红. 基于最大流传输贡献度的电力网关键线路和节点辨识[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36(9): 6-12.
|
| [9] |
王佳裕, 顾雪平, 王涛, 等. 一种综合潮流追踪和链接分析的电力系统关键节点识别方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(6): 22-29.
|
| [10] |
王涛, 高成彬, 顾雪平, 等. 基于功率介数的电网关键环节辨识[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(7): 1907-1913.
|
| [11] |
王德林, 王晓茹. 电力系统中机电扰动的传播特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(19): 18-24.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
史进. 基于复杂网络理论的电力系统网络模型及网络性能分析的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2008.
|
| [14] |
杨胜春, 汤必强, 姚建国, 等. 基于态势感知的电网自动智能调度架构及关键技术[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(1): 3635-3641.
|
| [15] |
田世明, 陈希, 朱朝阳, 等. 电力应急管理理论与技术对策[J]. 电网技术, 2007, 31(24): 22-27.
|
| [16] |
王波, 马富齐, 王红霞. 新型并网主体安全风险辨识的数据特征、关键技术及防控挑战[J]. 南方电网技术, 2025, 19(7): 15-29.
在“双碳”目标驱动下,新型电力系统用户侧因分布式光伏、电动汽车充电桩、储能设备等新型并网主体的大规模接入面临多维安全风险挑战。首先系统分析了新型并网主体大规模接入引发的设备安全、电网安全及社会安全等问题,并指出了当前技术与管理层面的核心瓶颈,如设备质量不均、跨模态数据融合困难、安全防护缺失等。针对多模态数据的异构性、语义差异及关联特性,提出了多模态大模型构建技术,涵盖数据增强生成、跨模态语义对齐及参数高效微调方法,以提升风险感知精度。此外,从网架优化、智能运维、韧性提升三方面提出一体化安全防控对策,为新型电力系统安全治理提供了理论支撑与实践路径,助力“双碳”目标下能源转型与安全协同发展。
Driven by the "dual carbon" goals, the user side of the new power system faces multidimensional security risks due to the large-scale integration of new grid-connected entities such as distributed photovoltaic systems, electric vehicle charging stations, and energy storage equipment.Firstly, the challenges to equipment safety, grid security, and societal safety posed by the massive integration of these new entities are systematically analyzed, core bottlenecks at the technical and managerial levels, such as uneven equipment quality, difficulties in cross-modal data fusion, and insufficient safety protections, are highlighted. To address the heterogeneity, semantic differences, and correlation characteristics of multimodal data, a multimodal large model construction technology is proposed, incorporating data augmentation generation, cross-modal semantic alignment, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods to enhance risk perception accuracy. Furthermore, integrated security prevention and control strategies are introduced from three perspectives: grid optimization, intelligent operation and maintenance, and resilience enhancement. These measures provide theoretical support and practical pathways for the security governance of the new power system, facilitating the coordinated development of energy transition and security under the "dual carbon" objectives. |
| [17] |
李柏青, 刘道伟, 秦晓辉, 等. 信息驱动的大电网全景安全防御概念及理论框架[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(21): 5796-5805, 6022.
|
| [18] |
吴茜, 张东霞, 刘道伟, 等. 基于随机矩阵理论的电网静态稳定态势评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(20): 5414-5420, 5717.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
徐心怡, 贺兴, 艾芊, 等. 基于随机矩阵理论的配电网运行状态相关性分析方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(3): 781-790.
|
| [21] |
魏大千, 王波, 刘涤尘, 等. 高维随机矩阵描述下的量测大数据建模与异常数据检测方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(增刊): 59-66.
|
| [22] |
严英杰, 盛戈皞, 王辉, 等. 基于高维随机矩阵大数据分析模型的输变电设备关键性能评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 435-445, 600.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
廖瑞金, 肖中男, 巩晶, 等. 应用马尔科夫模型评估电力变压器可靠性[J]. 高电压技术, 2010, 36(2): 322-328.
|
| [27] |
谢开贵, 马怀冬, 胡博, 等. 基于马尔可夫状态空间图法的换流变系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(9): 71-78.
|
| [28] |
张雪松, 王超, 程晓东. 基于马尔可夫状态空间法的超高压电网继电保护系统可靠性分析模型[J]. 电网技术, 2008, 32(13): 94-99.
|
| [29] |
刘耀, 王明新, 曾南超. 高压直流输电保护装置冗余配置可靠性的接续分析[J]. 电网技术, 2010, 34(11): 93-99.
|
| [30] |
王韶, 周家启. 双回平行输电线路可靠性模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(9): 53-56.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
熊俊, 肖先勇. 一种基于半马尔柯夫过程的配电系统可靠性经济评估方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2006, 34(12): 57-62.
|
| [33] |
刘文茂, 杨昆, 刘达, 等. 基于隐马尔科夫误差校正的日前电价预测[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2009, 33(10): 34-37.
|
| [34] |
丁明, 徐宁舟. 基于马尔可夫链的光伏发电系统输出功率短期预测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(1): 152-157.
|
利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests) 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |