Optimal PMU Placement Method for Active Distribution Networks Considering Wideband Oscillation Modal Energy Weighting

HUANG Xianda, WANG Lei, JIANG Weijian

Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 88-100.

PDF(2083 KB)
PDF(2083 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 88-100. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.08.007
Planning & Construction

Optimal PMU Placement Method for Active Distribution Networks Considering Wideband Oscillation Modal Energy Weighting

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] To address the sub-synchronous wideband oscillation problem caused by the high penetration of grid-forming distributed energy resources in active distribution networks, traditional phasor measurement unit (PMU) placement methods based on pure topology suffer from severe dynamic monitoring blind spots. Therefore, an optimal PMU placement method considering wideband oscillation modal energy weighting is proposed. [Methods] This paper establishes a high-order nonlinear differential-algebraic equation model of an active distribution network containing multiple virtual synchronous generators (VSGs) to accurately screen high-risk wideband target modes by extracting the system state-space matrix. Subsequently, a modal energy-weighted Fisher information matrix (FIM) is formulated based on modal eigenvectors and the inverse of the damping ratio, enabling the quantitative evaluation of the spatial localization characteristics of nodal wideband dynamic observability. Building upon this, an improved greedy placement algorithm integrating dynamic FIM scores and static topological gains is proposed, incorporating a spatial large-adjacency penalty mechanism to strictly ensure the global dispersion of measurement nodes. [Results] Tests on a modified IEEE 33-node extreme weak-ring network demonstrate that, under the strict investment constraint of K=14, the proposed method achieves a significant advantage in capturing total wideband dynamic energy compared to traditional integer linear programming (ILP) and unweighted FIM algorithms. The comprehensive observability for the worst-case mode consistently exceeds the safety margin. Both time-domain reconstructed waveforms and empirical mode decomposition-Hilbert-Huang transform (EMD-HHT) frequency-domain integrations verify that the method effectively eliminates the transient monitoring blind spots inherent in traditional configurations. Furthermore, across 50 Monte Carlo parameter perturbation tests, the system maintains exceptional robustness with zero failures. [Conclusions] The proposed method breaks through the physical limitations of pure topological placement, overcomes the low-frequency bias trap of conventional full-state algorithms, and accurately identifies the antinodes of wideband resonant energy. It achieves superior robustness in full-band dynamic perception while ensuring a full-rank static topology, providing rigorous theoretical support for the planning of wide-area dynamic monitoring systems in next-generation distribution networks.

Key words

active distribution network / wideband oscillation / phasor measurement unit (PMU) / Fisher information matrix (FIM) / optimal placement / robustness

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Xianda , WANG Lei , JIANG Weijian. Optimal PMU Placement Method for Active Distribution Networks Considering Wideband Oscillation Modal Energy Weighting[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2026, 47(8): 88-100 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.08.007

References

[1]
张智刚, 康重庆. 碳中和目标下构建新型电力系统的挑战与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2818.
Zhang Zhigang, Kang Chongqing. Challenges and prospects for constructing the new-type power system towards a carbon neutrality future[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2818.
[2]
国家能源局. 新型电力系统发展蓝皮书[R]. 北京: 国家能源局, 2023.
[3]
严胜. 电网结构形态演化分析方法研究及应用[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2023.
Yan Sheng. Research and application of power grid structure evolution analysis method[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2023.
[4]
鲍红焉, 刘吉成, 刘子毅, 等. 考虑电氢混合储能容量配置的主动配电网双层优化模型[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(10): 27-38.
Bao Hongyan, Liu Jicheng, Liu Ziyi, et al. A two-layer optimization model for active distribution networks considering electric-hydrogen hybrid energy storage capacity allocation[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(10): 27-38.
[5]
张启亮, 李开灿, 孔维娜, 等. 基于分布鲁棒的主动配电网多时间尺度优化调度[J]. 山东电力技术, 2025, 52(10): 34-45.
Zhang Qiliang, Li Kaican, Kong Weina, et al. Multi-time scale optimal dispatch of active distribution network based on distributionally robust optimization[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2025, 52(10): 34-45.
[6]
王家武, 赵佃云, 刘长锋, 等. 基于目标级联法的多主体主动配电网自治协同优化[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 214-226.
Wang Jiawu, Zhao Dianyun, Liu Changfeng, et al. Analytical target cascading based active distribution network level multi-agent autonomous collaborative optimization[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(7): 214-226.
[7]
蒋春容, 朱博汶, 周旭峰, 等. 基于分布式光伏集群控制的主动配电网电压优化策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(3): 188-200.
Jiang Chunrong, Zhu Bowen, Zhou Xufeng, et al. Voltage optimization strategy for active distribution network based ondistributed photovoltaic cluster control[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44(3): 188-200.
[8]
马浩然, 袁至, 王维庆, 等. 考虑数据中心和储能接入的主动配电网经济调度研究[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46(4): 748-757.
Abstract
目的 为了提高电网新能源消纳能力、降低发电企业运营成本,解决大规模可再生能源馈入配电网时网损增大和新能源消纳率降低等问题,提出一种考虑数据中心(data center,DC)和储能协同调度的主动式配电网经济调度策略。 方法 首先,通过利用DC的时空可调特性,以及储能设备能够缓解电网发用电两侧矛盾的作用,充分协同调度DC和储能来达到削峰填谷;其次,为提高算法的搜索性能,在麻雀搜索算法中引入了Tent混沌初始化和多种群竞争等机制;然后,考虑到需求响应机制分时电价的影响,在储能成本、运行成本等多个约束条件下利用改进型麻雀搜索算法对模型进行优化调度,最大程度实现灵活性负荷与新能源的最优化匹配;最后,以改进IEEE 30和33节点系统为算例,仿真验证所提策略的有效性。 结果 提出的协同调度策略能够有效降低配电网综合运行成本,提高新能源消纳率。 结论 该策略可以为配电网经济调度的相关研究提供一定参考价值。
Ma Haoran, Yuan Zhi, Wang Weiqing, et al. Research on economic scheduling of active distribution networks with inclusion of data center and energy storage[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(4): 748-757.

Objectives To improve the new energy consumption capacity of the power grid, reduce operational costs for power generation companies, and address issues such as increased network losses and reduced new energy consumption when large-scale renewable energy is integrated into the distribution networks, an economic scheduling strategy for active distribution networks with the inclusion of the coordinated scheduling of data center (DC) and energy storage is proposed. Methods Firstly, by utilizing the spatiotemporal adjustability of DC and the role of energy storage devices in alleviating the imbalance between grid supply and demand, the coordinated scheduling of DC and energy storage is fully leveraged to achieve peak shaving and valley filling. Secondly, the search performance of the sparrow search algorithm is improved by incorporating Tent Chaos initialization and multi-population competition mechanisms into the algorithm. Then, considering the impact of time-of-use pricing on the demand response mechanism, the model is optimized using an improved sparrow search algorithm under constraints such as energy storage costs and operational costs, aiming to achieve the optimal matching of flexible loads and new energy. Finally, the improved IEEE 30 and IEEE 33 node systems are taken as examples to verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Results The proposed cooperative scheduling strategy can effectively reduce the overall operational costs of the distribution networks and improve the new energy consumption rate. Conclusions The strategy can provide some reference value for the related research of economic dispatch of distribution network.

[9]
焦昊, 殷岩岩, 吴晨, 等. 基于安全强化学习的主动配电网有功-无功协调优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(3):43-50.
Jiao Hao, Yin Yanyan, Wu Chen, et al. Coordinated optimization of active and reactive power of active distribution network based on safety reinforcement learning[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(3): 43-50.
[10]
谭科, 王志承, 刘肇熙, 等. 考虑分布式储能的主动配电网需求侧管理机制与可靠优化方法[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37(12):129-137.
Tan Ke, Wang Zhicheng, Liu Zhaoxi, et al. Demand side management mechanism and robust optimization method for active distribution networks considering distributed energy storage system[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37(12):129-137.
[11]
颜湘武, 徐越, 张辉, 等. 计及阻尼控制的受端构网型换流器调频关键参数估测方法[J]. 电力建设, 2026, 47(4): 1-15.
Yan Xiangwu, Xu Yue, Zhang Hui, et al. Key parameter estimation method for frequency modulation of receiving-end grid-forming converters considering damping control[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2026, 47(4): 1-15.
[12]
Yang C R, Huang L B, Xin H H, et al. Placing grid-forming converters to enhance small signal stability of PLL-integrated power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021, 36(4): 3563-3573.
[13]
孙华东, 许涛, 郭强, 等. 英国“8·9”大停电事故分析及对中国电网的启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(21): 6183-6191.
Sun Huadong, Xu Tao, Guo Qiang, et al. Analysis on blackout in Great Britain power grid on August 9th, 2019 and its enlightenment to power grid in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(21): 6183-6191.
[14]
马宁宁, 谢小荣, 贺静波, 等. 高比例新能源和电力电子设备电力系统的宽频振荡研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(15): 4720-4731.
Ma Ningning, Xie Xiaorong, He Jingbo, et al. Review of wide-band oscillation in renewable and power electronics highly integrated power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(15): 4720-4731.
[15]
张瑶, 邱伟, 杨秋爽, 等. 基于复合本征噪声辅助分解的新型电力系统宽频振荡源定位[J]. 电力建设, 2026, 47(4): 152-162.
Zhang Yao, Qiu Wei, Yang Qiushuang, et al. Wideband oscillation source localization of new power system based on compound intrinsic noise-assisted decomposition[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2026, 47(4): 152-162.
[16]
De La Ree J, Centeno V, Thorp J S, et al. Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2010, 1(1): 20-27.
[17]
Phadke A G, Thorp J S. Synchronized phasor measurements and their applications[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[18]
Von Meier A, Stewart E, McEachern A, et al. Precision micro-synchrophasors for distribution systems: a summary of applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 8(6): 2926-2936.
[19]
Gou B. Optimal placement of PMUs by integer linear programming[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1525-1526.
[20]
Theodorakatos N P. Optimal phasor measurement unit placement for numerical observability using branch-and-bound and a binary-coded genetic algorithm[J]. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2019, 47(4/5): 357-371.
[21]
Ali A, Abdul Wahab N I, Othman M L, et al. Optimal µ-PMU placement and voltage estimation in distribution networks: evaluation through multiple case studies[J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(24): 11036.
This study optimizes the placement of μ-PMUs using the BPSO and BGWO algorithms for the IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus systems, with a focus on minimizing deployment costs while ensuring robust system observability. Three case studies are analysed: Case 1 (normal conditions), Case 2 (single μ-PMU outage), and Case 3 (Zero Injection Buses, ZIBs). In Case 1, both algorithms identified 24 μ-PMUs as the optimal placement for the IEEE 69-bus system, achieving the minimum PMUs required for full observability. For Case 2, redundancy requirements increased the μ-PMU count to 24 μ-PMUs for the IEEE 33-bus system and 51 μ-PMUs for the IEEE 69-bus system, ensuring full observability even under a single μ-PMU failure. Case 3, leveraging Zero Injection Buses (ZIBs), reduced the μ-PMU count to 20 μ-PMUs for both BPSO and BGWO, optimizing the system configuration while maintaining observability. A trade-off analysis was performed to examine the trade-off between redundancy and PMU count, showing that increasing the number of μ-PMUs improves system resilience. Voltage and current channels were measured from the optimized placements to ensure accurate voltage measurement in all case studies. Subsequently, the Weighted Least Squares algorithm was applied for voltage estimation, serving as a peripheral to the main objective of the optimal μ-PMU placement. Voltage estimation was conducted under three noise levels: 0.01 STD for basic analysis and 0.02 and 0.04 STD to observe the impact of varying measurement noise. The results highlight that higher μ-PMU placements improve voltage estimation accuracy, particularly under higher noise levels. Statistical analysis confirms that BGWO outperforms BPSO in terms of computational efficiency, stability, and convergence, especially in large-scale systems. By enhancing grid monitoring and state estimation, this research directly contributes to the development of more resilient and efficient power networks, which is a fundamental prerequisite for integrating renewable energy sources and advancing overall power system sustainability. This research emphasizes the balance between cost and reliability in μ-PMU placement and provides a comprehensive methodology for state estimation in modern power systems.
[22]
Gholami M, Abbaspour A, Fattaheian-Dehkordi S, et al. Optimal allocation of PMUs in active distribution network considering reliability of state estimation results[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2020, 14(18): 3641-3651.
[23]
Tian S X, Zhu F, Shen J H, et al. Distributed state estimation of active distribution network considering mixed-frequency measurement data hierarchical encryption[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 388: 125661.
[24]
Alghassab M A, Hatata A Y, Sokrana A H, et al. Optimal location of PMUs for full observability of power system using coronavirus herd immunity optimizer[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(11): e31832.
[25]
晁婉萌, 刘灏, 毕天姝, 等. 考虑N-1故障重构下的配电网PMU优化配置方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(2): 569-581.
Chao Wanmeng, Liu Hao, Bi Tianshu, et al. An optimal PMU allocation method for distribution networks under considering N-1 fault reconfiguration[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, 46(2): 569-581.
[26]
朱咏明, 何龙, 王清彬, 等. 基于灰狼优化算法的PMU配置模型[J]. 电力设备管理, 2024(18): 202-204.
Zhu Yongming, He Long, Wang Qingbin, et al. PMU configuration model based on grey wolf optimization algorithm[J]. Electric Power Equipment Management, 2024(18): 202-204.
[27]
杭鲁庆, 刘敏. 基于改进鲸鱼优化算法的同步相量测量单元多目标优化配置[J]. 现代电力, 2024, 41(4): 652-658.
Hang Luqing, Liu Min. Multi-objective optimization configuration of synchronized phasor measurement units based on improved whale optimization algorithm[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2024, 41(4): 652-658.
[28]
郑明忠, 张道农, 张小易, 等. 基于节点集合的PMU优化配置方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(13): 138-142.
Zheng Mingzhong, Zhang Daonong, Zhang Xiaoyi, et al. PMU optimal placement based on node set[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(13): 138-142.
[29]
Qi J J, Sun K, Kang W. Optimal PMU placement for power system dynamic state estimation by using empirical observability gramian[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 30(4): 2041-2054.
[30]
Huang T, Wu M, Xie L. Prioritization of PMU location and signal selection for monitoring critical power system oscillations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(4): 3919-3929.
[31]
Kazma M H, Taha A F. Revisiting the optimal PMU placement problem in multimachine power networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2025, 33(2): 493-511.
[32]
Dehghani M, Shayanfard B, Khayatian A R. PMU ranking based on singular value decomposition of dynamic stability matrix[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 2263-2270.
[33]
Yaghmaei A, Yazdanpanah M J. Structure preserving observer design for port-Hamiltonian systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2019, 64(3): 1214-1220.
[34]
Xygkis T, Korres G, Manousakis N M. Fisher information based meter placement in distribution grids via the D-optimal experimental design[C]// 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech. IEEE, 2017: 1.
[35]
Schubert S, Sovljanski V, Spertino F, et al. Accurate parameter estimation on photovoltaic modules using fisher information matrix and D-optimal design[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 212378-212406.
[36]
Zhao J B, Gómez-Expósito A, Netto M, et al. Power system dynamic state estimation: motivations, definitions, methodologies, and future work[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(4): 3188-3198.
[37]
Abdolahi A, Taghizadegan N, Banaei M R, et al. A reliability-based optimal μ-PMU placement scheme for efficient observability enhancement of smart distribution grids under various contingencies[J]. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2021, 15(8): 663-680.
[38]
Hu Y, Bu S Q, Zhou B, et al. Impedance-based oscillatory stability analysis of high power electronics-penetrated power systems: a survey[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 120774-120787.
[39]
Nemhauser G L, Wolsey L A, Fisher M L. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions: I[J]. Mathematical Programming, 1978, 14(1): 265-294.
[40]
Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971): 903-995.
[41]
IEEE Std C37.118.1-2011 IEEE standard for synchrophasor measurements for power systems[S]. New York: IEEE, 2011.

Footnotes

利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests) 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

作者贡献声明(Authors' Contributions) 黄贤达进行了实验研究并分析数据,完成论文撰写;王磊提出研究思路、研究方案和论文框架,指导论文修订;江伟建进行文献调研与整理,完成论文审核。所有作者均阅读并同意了论文终稿内容。

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(61873159)
PDF(2083 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Recommended

/