Evaluation and Provincial Comparative Analysis of New-Type Power System Based on Four-Side Joint Calculation Factors

GAO Qian, TANG Weijia, YANG Junyi, LI Qiang, ZHANG Ningyu, XUE Heyu

Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 45-61.

PDF(2408 KB)
PDF(2408 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 45-61. DOI: 10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.09.004
Planning & Construction

Evaluation and Provincial Comparative Analysis of New-Type Power System Based on Four-Side Joint Calculation Factors

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] To address the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks for new power systems, such as the inadequate representation of “generation-grid-load-storage” synergy and overly simplistic evaluation dimensions, this paper develops a comprehensive evaluation system capable of scientifically quantifying the level of four-side collaborative development. [Methods] An evaluation matrix comprising 14 indicators across 12 aspects was constructed based on the five core characteristics of the new power system. A “four-side joint calculation factor” was innovatively introduced to deeply embed the collaborative relationships of generation-grid-load-storage into the indicator calculation process. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, combined with reference value methods, was employed to achieve a quantitative assessment of provincial-level systems. [Results] Case studies demonstrate that the framework effectively reveals developmental disparities between provinces. Province A leads in clean and low-carbon performance; however, its renewable energy installation structure results in poor generation-load temporal matching and insufficient flexibility resources. In contrast, Province B excels in supply-demand coordination and intelligent flexibility, though its energy transition progress and economic efficiency are relatively constrained. Sensitivity analysis confirms that new energy storage configuration, wind and solar installation scales, and demand response capacity are key factors influencing the overall system performance, validating the reliability and robustness of the proposed model. [Conclusions] The proposed evaluation system, based on the “four-side joint calculation factor,” achieves a precise quantitative characterization of collaborative development across generation, grid, load, and storage. It effectively identifies regional system bottlenecks and provides a quantitative basis for the planning, construction, and differentiated policy-making of new power systems.

Key words

new-type power system / generation-grid-load-storage / coordinated development / evaluation system / four-side joint calculation factors

Cite this article

Download Citations
GAO Qian , TANG Weijia , YANG Junyi , et al . Evaluation and Provincial Comparative Analysis of New-Type Power System Based on Four-Side Joint Calculation Factors[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2026, 47(9): 45-61 https://doi.org/10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2026.09.004

References

[1]
康重庆, 杜尔顺, 郭鸿业, 等. 新型电力系统的六要素分析[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(5): 1741-1750.
Kang Chongqing, Du Ershun, Guo Hongye, et al. Primary exploration of six essential factors in new power system[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47(5): 1741-1750.
[2]
肖小龙, 史明明, 吴凡, 等. 配电网格虚拟电厂动态频率聚合控制策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2026, 45(2): 80-92.
Xiao Xiaolong, Shi Mingming, Wu Fan, et al. Dynamic frequency aggregation control strategy of meshed distribution virtual power plant[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2026, 45(2): 80-92.
[3]
国家能源局. 国家能源局综合司关于公开征求《新型电力系统发展蓝皮书(征求意见稿)》意见的通知[EB/OL]. (2023-01-04).[2025-10-25]. https://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/2023-01/04/c_1310688702.htm.
[4]
黄河, 王建学, 肖云鹏, 等. 新型电力系统电力电量平衡分析关键技术与研究框架[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(9): 1-12.
Abstract
随着新型电力系统加速构建,可再生能源发电装机与电量占比不断攀升。如何在源荷双重强不确定性下实现准确、高效、实用的电力电量平衡分析,是新型电力系统调控与规划中的基础与关键问题。通过对电力电量平衡分析在研究对象、分析模型与方法、评价指标与应用等方面的综述,总结了现有研究在平衡状态刻画和分析计算方面的不足。针对“强随机性与策略性下的电力电量平衡状态刻画”与“集中调控-协调自治平衡机制下的电力电量平衡分析与计算”两大关键科学问题,首先提出了涵盖“平衡边界生成-平衡分析计算-平衡状态评估-平衡预警-平衡能力提升”的新型电力系统电力电量平衡分析研究内容体系,接着阐述随机性平衡场景生成、多周期协调解耦的平衡分析、平衡状态评估指标体系设计、多时空分级平衡能力预警和新型平衡协作机制的研究思路与技术方案。最后总结并展望了新型电力系统电力电量平衡分析研究中需要重点突破的关键技术。
Huang He, Wang Jianxue, Xiao Yunpeng, et al. Key technologies and research framework for the power andEnergy balance analysis in new-type power systems[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(9): 1-12.
[5]
董昱, 孙大雁, 许丹, 等. 新型电力系统电力电量平衡的挑战、应对与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(6): 2039-2056.
Dong Yu, Sun Dayan, Xu Dan, et al. Challenges, response and prospects for power balance in new power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(6): 2039-2056.
[6]
陈典, 陆润钊, 张松涛, 等. 新型电力系统电力电量平衡计算分析技术综述[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(10): 3952-3970.
Chen Dian, Lu Runzhao, Zhang Songtao, et al. Review of new power system power balance calculation and analysis techniques[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47(10): 3952-3970.
[7]
李宛洳, 郭瑾程, 王建学, 等. 新型电力系统电力电量平衡概率性分析实用方法研究[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(9): 1-12.
Li Wanru, Guo Jincheng, Wang Jianxue, et al. A practical method for probabilistic analysis of electric power and energy balance of new power system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2025, 46(9): 1-12.
[8]
李聚聪, 李荣敏, 荀超, 等. 新型电力系统指标体系研究[J]. 电气工程学报, 2025, 20(3): 188-198.
Li Jucong, Li Rongmin, Xun Chao, et al. Research on the new power system index system[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2025, 20(3): 188-198.
[9]
Peng L Q, Mauzerall D L, Zhong Y D, et al. Heterogeneous effects of battery storage deployment strategies on decarbonization of provincial power systems in China[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 4858.
Battery storage is critical for integrating variable renewable generation, yet how the location, scale, and timing of storage deployment affect system costs and carbon dioxide (CO) emissions is uncertain. We improve a power system model, SWITCH-China, to examine three nationally uniform battery deployment strategies (Renewable-connected, Grid-connected, and Demand-side) and a heterogeneous battery deployment strategy where each province is allowed to utilize any of the three battery strategies. Here, we find that the heterogeneous strategy always provides the lowest system costs among all four strategies, where provinces with abundant renewable resources dominantly adopt Renewable-connected batteries while those with limited renewables dominantly adopt Demand-side batteries. However, which strategy achieves the lowest CO emissions depends on carbon prices. The Renewable-connected strategy achieves the lowest CO emissions when carbon prices are relatively low, and the heterogeneous strategy results in the lowest CO emissions only at extremely high carbon prices.© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
[10]
刘科, 杨兴森, 杨淼, 等. 计及低碳需求响应的源网荷储协同优化调度[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2025, 44(7): 51-61.
Liu Ke, Yang Xingsen, Yang Miao, et al. Optimal scheduling for source-grid-load-storage coordination considering low-carbon demand response[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2025, 44(7): 51-61.
As the construction of the novel power system continues to advance, the cooperative development of source-grid-load-storage is inevitable. However, under the background of “dual-carbon”, the existing source-grid-load-storage cooperative optimization scheduling method does not take into account enough factors such as carbon emission. It is difficult to support the low-carbon development of the novel power system. In this paper, firstly, dynamic carbon emission factors are introduced to propose a low-carbon demand response mechanism driven by both benefits and low carbon, and a low-carbon demand response model is built to accommodate the economic cost and low carbon emission. Secondly, based on the theory of carbon emission flow, a source-grid-load-storage synergistic day-ahead economic dispatch model is constructed considering the carbon flow constraints, which helps the power system to operate with carbon reduction. Subsequently, in order to deal with the nonlinearities introduced by the consideration of carbon flow constraints, a decomposition method is used to deal with them, which is solved by alternating iterations of the two subproblems: low-carbon scheduling and carbon flow calculation. Finally, through the IEEE-14 node system, we implemented the cooperative optimization scheduling for source-grid-load-storage coordination considering low-carbon demand response. The results show that the proposed model and method can effectively balance the carbon and economy, and promote the cooperative development of each section of source-grid-load-storage in the context of the “dual-carbon”.
[11]
程其云, 李峰, 罗澍忻, 等. 新型电力系统规划方法框架及关键支撑技术[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(6): 2219-2231.
Cheng Qiyun, Li Feng, Luo Shuxin, et al. Research on the planning methodology framework and key supporting technologies for new power systems[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(6): 2219-2231.
[12]
娄奇鹤, 李彦斌, 王登政, 等. 现代智慧配电网发展方向与关键技术框架研究[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(5): 69-83.
Lou Qihe, Li Yanbin, Wang Dengzheng, et al. Framework for the development direction and key technologies of modern smart distribution networks[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2025, 46(5): 69-83.
[13]
柴天佑, 钱锋, 管晓宏, 等. 面向“双碳”目标的自动化和智能化理论与技术[J]. 中国科学基金, 2024, 38(4): 560-570.
Chai Tianyou, Qian Feng, Guan Xiaohong, et al. Theory and technology of automation and intelligence for dual carbon target[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2024, 38(4): 560-570.
[14]
康俊杰, 赵春阳, 周国鹏, 等. 基于熵权-德尔菲法的源网荷储多能互补项目布局评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 120-131.
Kang Junjie, Zhao Chunyang, Zhou Guopeng, et al. A layout evaluation method for source-network-load-storage and multi-energy complementary projects based on entropy weight and Delphi method[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(12): 120-131.
[15]
卢锦玲, 张津, 丁茂生. 含风电的电力系统调度经济性评价[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(8): 2258-2264.
Lu Jinling, Zhang Jin, Ding Maosheng. Economic evaluation of power system dispatch integrated with wind power[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(8): 2258-2264.
[16]
刘宇, 樊玮, 霍嘉兴, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS的风电并网友好特性评价方法[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2025(5): 625-635.
Liu Yu, Fan Wei, Huo Jiaxing, et al. Evaluation method for grid-friendly characteristics of wind power integration based on improved TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2025(5): 625-635.
[17]
张爱军, 刘石川, 慕腾, 等. 新能源发电富集地区输电系统规划方案的综合评价[J]. 智慧电力, 2025, 53(2): 16-24.
Zhang Aijun, Liu Shichuan, Mu Teng, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of transmission system planning schemes in renewable energy generation enrichment region[J]. Smart Power, 2025, 53(2): 16-24.
[18]
李小双, 冷亚军, 吴坚. 基于多目标投影寻踪模型的电力发展水平评价方法[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2024, 39(5): 46-57.
Li Xiaoshuang, Leng Yajun, Wu Jian. Evaluating method for power development level based on multi-objective projection pursuit model[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2024, 39(5): 46-57.
[19]
赵艳, 柳伟, 唐鹏程, 等. 数据模型双驱动的负荷调节潜力评估及预测方法[J]. 电力工程技术, 2026, 45(3): 116-126.
Zhao Yan, Liu Wei, Tang Pengcheng, et al. Data-driven and model-driven evaluation and prediction methods for load regulation potential[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2026, 45(3): 116-126.
[20]
刘海鹏, 杨晓静, 陆涛, 等. 考虑分布式新能源的电网运行风险评估指标体系构建方法[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(12): 1-14.
Liu Haipeng, Yang Xiaojing, Lu Tao, et al. A method for constructing a risk assessment indicator system for grid operation considering distributed new energy sources[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43(12): 1-14.
[21]
旷嘉庆, 汤迪霏, 王晗, 等. 计及光储充的电动汽车充电服务可靠性时序评估[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(6): 94-102.
Kuang Jiaqing, Tang Difei, Wang Han, et al. Temporal evaluation of electric vehicle charging services reliability considering photovoltaic-storage-charging integration[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44(6): 94-102.
[22]
肖勇, 陆文升, 李云涛, 等. 城市配电网发展形态指标体系及其评估方法研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(1): 62-71.
Xiao Yong, Lu Wensheng, Li Yuntao, et al. Research on index system and its evaluation methods of urban distribution network development form[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(1): 62-71.
[23]
宫云鹏, 李宏艳, 于会凤. 智能电网规划评价指标体系的构建及分析[J]. 电力设备管理, 2020(3): 42-43, 58.
Gong Yunpeng, Li Hongyan, Yu Huifeng. Construction and analysis of smart grid planning evaluation index system[J]. Electric Power Equipment Management, 2020(3): 42-43, 58.
[24]
郑玉平, 王俊, 杨志宏, 等. 城镇能源互联网示范应用综述: 现状、经验及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(17): 153-166.
Zheng Yuping, Wang Jun, Yang Zhihong, et al. Review on demonstration application of urban energy internet: present situation, experience and prospect[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(17): 153-166.
[25]
安洪光, 董博, 郑媛媛, 等. 新型电力系统中基于发电设备状态的容量参数和指标体系研究[J]. 新型电力系统, 2024, 2(4): 418-433.
An Hongguang, Dong Bo, Zheng Yuanyuan, et al. Research on capacity parameters and indicator system based on power generation equipment status in new power systems[J]. New Type Power Systems, 2024, 2(4): 418-433.
[26]
闫群民, 屈晨光, 王磊, 等. 考虑双碳目标的新型电力系统源-网-荷-储评价体系研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(12): 469-482.
Yan Qunmin, Qu Chenguang, Wang Lei, et al. Study on source-grid-load-storage evaluation system of new-type power system under carbon peaking and carbon-neutral goal[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2025, 46(12): 469-482.
[27]
易俊, 林伟芳, 任萱, 等. 新型电力系统发展水平指标体系构建及综合评价方法研究[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(9): 3758-3768.
Yi Jun, Lin Weifang, Ren Xuan, et al. Research on construction of index system and comprehensive evaluation method of development level of new power system[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48(9): 3758-3768.
[28]
阮前途. 面向省级新型电力系统的发展评价方法及目标形态研究[J]. 新型电力系统, 2024, 2(1): 26-35.
Ruan Qiantu. Research on development evaluation method and target forms for provincial new power system[J]. New Type Power Systems, 2024, 2(1): 26-35.
[29]
王绪利, 潘东, 施天成, 等. 新型电力系统背景下源网荷储一体化项目友好性评估方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(1): 72-82.
Wang Xuli, Pan Dong, Shi Tiancheng, et al. A friendliness evaluation method for the source-network-load-storage integration project under the background of new power system[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2024, 40(1): 72-82.
[30]
高子寒, 张思瑞, 成岭, 等. 近零碳园区的综合能源系统优化与评价方法[J]. 分布式能源, 2025, 10(2): 25-35.
Abstract
为降低园区综合能源系统碳排放,基于园区能源需求和负荷特性,设计了基于电能替代技术的综合能源系统方案,建立全工况仿真模型。通过非支配排序遗传算法和Gurobi求解器对多目标协同优化问题进行求解,并采用熵权-优劣解距离法进行综合评价决策,从而确定最优系统容量配置和运行策略。案例分析表明:所提方案使园区碳排放强度降低77%,满足近零碳园区要求;年能源净成本降低61.2%,能源自给率提升至71.3%。优化后的综合能源系统显著提升了能源利用效率和安全性,降低了碳排放,增强了园区能源独立性。
Gao Zihan, Zhang Sirui, Cheng Ling, et al. Optimization and evaluation method of integrated energy system for near-zero carbon park[J]. Distributed Energy, 2025, 10(2): 25-35.

To reduce the carbon emissions of the park's integrated energy system, an integrated energy system scheme based on electric energy substitution technology is designed according to the park's energy demand and load characteristics. A full-working condition simulation model is also established. Firstly, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA) and Gurobi solver are employed to address the multi-objective cooperative optimization problem. Subsequently, the entropy weight-solution distance method is utilized for comprehensive evaluation and decision-making, thereby determining the optimal system capacity allocation and operational strategy. Case analysis demonstrates that the proposed scheme decreases the park's carbon emission intensity by 77%, satisfying the requirements for a near-zero carbon park. Additionally, the annual net energy cost is reduced by 61.2%, while the energy self-sufficiency rate is increased to 71.3%. The optimized integrated energy system significantly enhances energy efficiency and security, reduces carbon emissions, and strengthens the park's energy independence.

[31]
陈志君, 李智革, 覃惠玲, 等. 面向零碳建筑的多维度综合评价方法[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2025, 8(5): 542-551.
Chen Zhijun, Li Zhige, Qin Huiling, et al. Multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation method for zero carbon buildings[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2025, 8(5): 542-551.
[32]
任卓亚, 郭宁, 解佗, 等. 我国清洁能源发展规律分析及其与经济系统的协调发展评价[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(12): 128-134.
Ren Zhuoya, Guo Ning, Xie Tuo, et al. A study on the development patterns of clean energy in China and evaluation of its coordinated development with the economic system[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2024, 40(12): 128-134.
[33]
建设更高水平开放型经济新体制推动能耗双控逐步转向碳排放双控[N]. 人民日报, 2023-07-12( 1).
[34]
国家发展改革委. 加快构建新型电力系统行动方案(2024-2027)[EB/OL].(2024-07-25)[2025-10-25]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_6966863.htm.
[35]
潘也, 任胜钢. 我国新能源产业区域协同发展的建设路径与对策[J]. 中国工程科学, 2025, 27(6): 286-302.
Abstract
以风能和太阳能为代表的新能源正逐步重塑能源消费结构,推动我国能源体系向绿色低碳方向转型;加快构建新能源产业区域协同发展的新格局,对保障国家能源安全与实现“双碳”战略目标具有重要意义。本文在系统分析我国新能源产业区域协同发展内在需求的基础上,全面识别当前我国新能源产业区域协同发展的现状和面临的挑战,并针对性地提出协同发展的建设路径与重点举措。研究表明,我国新能源产业区域协同发展面临能源资源与需求空间错配、产业链上下游空间割裂、国际能源竞争加剧等现实需求,在支撑“源 – 网 – 荷 – 储 – 数”一体化发展的基础工程、配套工程和市场体系建设方面存在诸多挑战。为此,坚持“全链条整合 – 全空间联动 – 全过程优化”的系统思维,本文提出了新能源产业区域协同发展的建设路径,即以区域内优化布局、区域间协调联动为两大着力点,聚焦资源开发、输电调度、负荷响应与市场交易4个关键技术突破方向,推进“源 – 网 – 荷 – 储 – 数”一体化路径创新与工程示范建设。研究建议,因地制宜科学布局风光大基地、强化跨区 – 省内 – 局域电网调度协同、推动负荷响应机制智能化与常态化、从“设计 – 运营 – 认证”全过程强化市场衔接,以期为我国新能源产业区域协同发展提供方向性启发与实践指导。
Pan Ye, Ren Shenggang. Construction pathway and countermeasures for regional collaborative development of China’s new energy industry[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2025, 27(6): 286-302.

New energy sources represented by wind and solar power are gradually reshaping China's energy consumption structure and driving the transition of China's energy system toward a green and low-carbon orientation. This transformation accelerates the formation of a regionally coordinated development pattern within the new energy industry, which is of great significance for ensuring national energy security and achieving the carbon peaking and carbon neutralization goals. Based on a systematic analysis of the intrinsic requirements for regional coordination in China's new energy industry, this study identifies the current situation and major challenges of regional collaboration, and proposes targeted development pathways and key measures. The findings indicate that the regional collaborative development of China's new energy industry faces multiple challenges, including spatial mismatches between energy resource supply and demand, spatial fragmentation along the upstream and downstream segments of the industrial chain, and intensified international energy competition. Moreover, significant challenges remain in the construction of basic and supporting projects as well as market systems that underpin the integrated development of "generation–grid–load–storage–data". To address these challenges, this study adopts a systems-thinking framework featuring "full-chain integration, full-space linkage, and whole-process optimization," and proposes a coordinated development pathway focusing on intra-regional optimization and inter-regional collaboration. The research highlights four key directions for technological breakthroughs—resource development, power transmission and dispatching, demand response, and market transactions—and promotes innovative integration and demonstration of "generation–grid–load–storage–data" systems. Policy recommendations include: promoting the rational layout of large-scale wind and solar power bases according to local conditions; strengthening coordination across inter-regional, provincial, and local grid dispatching; enhancing the intelligence and normalization of demand response mechanisms; and improving market connectivity throughout the entire "design–operation–certification" process. These recommendations provide strategic insights and practical guidance for advancing the regionally coordinated and high-quality development of China's new energy industry.

[36]
李建林, 郭兆东, 马速良, 等. 新型电力系统下“源网荷储”架构与评估体系综述[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(11): 4330-4341.
Li Jianlin, Guo Zhaodong, Ma Suliang, et al. Overview of the“source-grid-load-storage”architecture and evaluation system under the new power system[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(11): 4330-4341.
[37]
Li X J, Wang S X. Energy management and operational control methods for grid battery energy storage systems[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2021, 7(5): 1026-1040.

Footnotes

作者贡献声明(Authors' Contributions): 高骞提出论文整体研究思路与框架,并参与论文的撰写与修订;唐伟佳完成文献调研、论文撰写与修订;杨俊义对全文学术逻辑与论证深度进行多轮修订;李强参与分析数据与绘制图谱;张宁宇参与论文初稿撰写与修订;薛禾雨参与论文审阅与修订。所有作者均阅读并同意了论文终稿内容。

利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests): 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

Funding

National Science and Technology Major Project of Smart Grid(2026ZD0810200)
PDF(2408 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Recommended

/