PDF(5109 KB)
Bi-Level Optimal Scheduling of Charging Stations Considering V2G Residual Capacity
LI Xingzhuang, YU Aiqing, CHENG Zhang
Electric Power Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10) : 97-108.
PDF(5109 KB)
PDF(5109 KB)
Bi-Level Optimal Scheduling of Charging Stations Considering V2G Residual Capacity
[Objective] The large-scale integration of high-penetration electric vehicles (EVs) into distribution networks inevitably causes voltage fluctuation issues. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a collaborative method for optimal configuration of multi-type vehicle-to-grid (V2G) chargers and coordinated voltage quality improvement of distribution networks. [Methods] This paper establishes a bi-level collaborative optimal scheduling model for charging stations that incorporates the reactive power response characteristics of the residual capacity of multi-type V2G chargers. The upper-level model aims to minimize the annual power purchase cost of EVs and the investment cost of chargers, realizing the collaborative optimization of charging strategies and charger type selection. The lower-level model takes the minimum voltage deviation at the point of common coupling (PCC) of charging stations as the optimization objective, and adopts the residual capacity of chargers to implement reactive power voltage regulation. The bi-level model achieves efficient collaborative operation via active-reactive power decoupling and iterative correction of constraint boundaries. [Results] Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed model can reduce the comprehensive operational cost and effectively improve the voltage profile of distribution networks, with a maximum node voltage quality improvement of 40.46% during peak electricity price periods. [Conclusions] The proposed model well balances the economic benefits of EV charging and the voltage safety of power grids. It verifies the feasibility of V2G chargers in realizing the dual functions of charging service and grid auxiliary support, providing a novel technical solution for chargers to participate in grid ancillary services.
vehicle-to-grid (V2G) / charging pile selection / electric vehicle charging station / reactive power compensation / voltage quality
| [1] |
赵宇, 贺兴, 艾芊. 基于碳流追踪的电动汽车充电站定价方法[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44(6): 2-12.
|
| [2] |
交通运输部科学研究院, 中国交通建设集团有限公司. 交通运输绿色低碳发展报告2024—2025[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2025.
China Academy of Transportation Sciences, China Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd.. Report on the green and low-carbon development of transportation in China (2024-2025)[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2025.
|
| [3] |
刘嘉彦, 李祖坤, 李畅, 等. 电动汽车与电力—交通耦合网互动: 综述与展望[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2024, 39(5): 12-24.
|
| [4] |
朱晗, 汪隆君, 陈志峰, 等. 电动汽车充电站参与辅助服务的无功功率支撑能力评估[J]. 南方电网技术, 2025, 19(8): 11-19, 30.
电动汽车(electric vehicle,EV)充电站利用其剩余无功功率容量向电网提供辅助服务,既能帮助电网实现自动电压控制(automatic voltage control,AVC),也能为充电站带来额外的收益。因此,提出了EV充电站调压辅助服务的市场机制,建立了充电站内充电桩的电路拓扑结构,并分析了充电桩进行无功功率支撑的基本原理。在此基础上,利用概率统计学和蒙特卡洛法,考虑电动私家车、电动出租车各自对应的充电需求,分别模拟了其充电行为;并结合充电桩的功率约束和变压器容量约束,预测出了充电站日内负荷分布曲线;进而评估出充电站日内无功功率支撑能力,并计算出日内充电站参与调压辅助服务所取得的收益。对充电站内快充充电桩的相关参数进行灵敏度分析,体现出不同参数对应的EV充电站无功功率支撑能力的差异,为充电站申报参与调压服务容量并获取相关补偿收益提供技术分析手段。
Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations utilize their remaining reactive power capacity to provide auxiliary services to the power grid, assisting in achieving automatic voltage control (AVC) and generating additional revenue for the charging stations. In this paper a market mechanism for the voltage regulation auxiliary services of EV charging stations is proposed, the circuit topology of charging piles within the charging station is established, and the basic principles of reactive power support by charging piles are analyzed. Based on this, using probability statistics and the Monte Carlo method, considering the charging demands of electric private cars and electric taxis, the charging behaviors of each are simulated. Combined with power constraints of the charging piles and transformer capacity constraints, the daily load distribution curve of the charging station is predicted. Furthermore, the reactive power support capability of the charging station within a day is evaluated and the revenue obtained from the participation of the charging station in voltage regulation auxiliary services within a day is calculated. Sensitivity analysis of relevant parameters of fast-charging piles within the charging station is conducted, highlighting the differences in reactive power support capabilities corresponding to different parameters of EV charging stations. This provides technical analysis tools for charging stations to declare their participation capacities in voltage regulation services and obtain relevant compensation benefits. |
| [5] |
江建, 张树森, 徐峰亮. 考虑电动汽车集群响应的分布式资源协同调度策略研究[J]. 山东电力技术, 2024, 51(6): 1-11, 35.
|
| [6] |
赵天翼, 刘代飞, 何灵奇, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法的高速公路充电站储能系统优化配置[J]. 广东电力, 2025, 38(8): 19-31.
|
| [7] |
王永利, 朱明阳, 张云飞, 等. 考虑电力市场与新能源耦合的换电站充电优化调度策略[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(6): 38-48.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
乔栋. 城市电动汽车多类型充电设施的选址规划研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2024.
|
| [10] |
庞松岭, 赵雨楠, 唐金锐, 等. 基于充电桩利用率的充电负荷超短期预测方法研究[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2024, 39(1): 115-123, 133.
|
| [11] |
宣羿, 樊立波, 孙智卿, 等. 考虑低碳交通的电动汽车充电站优化配置方法[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(6): 69-79.
|
| [12] |
马永翔, 韩子悦, 闫群民, 等. 考虑电动汽车充电负荷及储能寿命的充电站储能容量配置优化[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(4): 92-101.
|
| [13] |
李振坤, 肖天宇, 宋治儒, 等. 基于节假日因素影响的高速服务区充电负荷建模与充电桩优化规划[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(12): 57-69.
|
| [14] |
徐婷婷, 龙羿, 胡晓锐, 等. “车-路-网” 耦合下含多类型充电桩协同的充电站规划[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(7): 95-107.
|
| [15] |
葛俊, 杨铎烔, 张子昊, 等. 基于随机匹配的构网型充电桩运行优化研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2026, 63(3): 70-77.
|
| [16] |
刘世林, 林浩, 徐晓, 等. 基于时序运行模拟的公共停车场V2G型单充多枪充电桩多规格协同优化配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(6): 2434-2445.
|
| [17] |
庞松岭, 赵海龙, 张晨佳. 计及充电需求差异的电动汽车充电设施协同优化配置[J]. 电测与仪表, 2024, 61(12): 171-177.
|
| [18] |
李咸善, 王苗. 考虑源荷不确定性的多微电网鲁棒优化调度与VCG机制竞价策略[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(6): 2330-2343.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
胡梦锴, 陈胜, 卫志农, 等. 考虑V2G参与意愿与充电需求的配电网-电动汽车协同优化研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44(8): 3-14.
|
| [21] |
马力, 彭伟伦, 范晋衡, 等. 基于改进纵横交叉算法的车网互动模式下电动汽车充放电优化调度策略研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62(2): 133-142.
|
| [22] |
刘晓飞, 张千帆, 崔淑梅. 电动汽车V2G技术综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2012, 27(2): 121-127.
|
| [23] |
张恺, 尹忠东, 杨啸天, 等. 基于V2G无功调度的电网无功补偿[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39(1): 40-47.
|
| [24] |
杨书强, 郭力, 刘娇扬, 等. 应用场景压缩和计及电压调节策略的光伏接入规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(15): 31-38.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
陈云辉, 张青苗, 陈姝敏, 等. 基于合作博弈的共享储能充电站协同优化调度与收益分配机制研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2025, 41(9): 18-26.
|
| [27] |
卞海红, 李灿, 童宇轩. 共享储能模式下电动汽车充电站双层优化运行策略[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43(5): 170-180.
|
| [28] |
刘思, 沈广, 胡金迪, 等. 一种利用剩余容量的电动汽车充电站无功补偿控制策略[J]. 浙江电力, 2021, 40(5): 14-19.
|
| [29] |
王强钢, 田雨禾, 王健, 等. 计及充电站无功补偿的配电网日前-实时协调优化模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(17): 27-34.
|
| [30] |
何奎元, 于江涛, 朱棋, 等. V2G模式下的电动汽车充电站分层无功调度策略[J]. 电气传动, 2024, 54(10): 39-49.
|
| [31] |
俞靖一, 葛俊, 杨铎烔, 等. 考虑电动车V2G交互的构网型充电桩研究设计[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62(12): 184-192.
|
| [32] |
张丙旭. 电动汽车并网场景下主动配电网能量管理优化策略研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2021.
|
| [33] |
畅骁. 基于V2G的无功优化方法研究[D]. 太原: 太原科技大学, 2020.
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
朱棋. 基于V2G技术的充电站分层无功调度策略研究[D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2021.
|
| [36] |
This paper was intended to explore the mutual influences between electric vehicle (EV) charging and charging facility planning, to establish a two-stage model for optimizing the EVs’ charging and charging piles’ selection. In the first stage, the distribution pattern of the demands for EV charging, and various EVs were effectively grouped, in order to reduce the amount of computation for solving the second stage model. The goal of the second stage was to minimize the annual investment and electricity purchasing costs on the charging piles, and the coordinated optimization was carried out for EV charging and charging pile selection. The CPLEX and IP_SOLVE packages were used in MATLAB (R2014a/64 bits) to solve the established optimization model. The simulation results showed that, compared with the scheme for selecting the charging pile under the typical charging pattern (TCP), the total cost of the charging pile could be reduced by 6.32% with a scheme under the optimized charging pattern (OCP), thereby promoting the coordinated development of both the EVs and charging facilities.
|
利益冲突声明(Conflict of Interests): 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。
作者贡献声明(Author' Contributions): 李兴壮起草论文,修订论文,确定研究对象范围,收集数据,采集、清洗与分析数据;于艾清参与论文修订、论文最终版本修订;成章参与文献调研与整理。所有作者均阅读并同意了论文终稿内容。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |