Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System

GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, LI Dongmei

Electric Power Construction ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 69-72.

PDF(534 KB)
PDF(534 KB)
Electric Power Construction ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 69-72.

Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System

  • GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, LI Dongmei
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The sampling and concentration determination of SO3 in flue gas for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitration system is introduced, separately with controlled condensation method and 80% isopropanol absorption method to sample and barium perchlorate-thorin indicator titration method to measure. The accuracy and influencial factors of these two sampling methods were studied and analyzed. The experimental results show that the concentration of SO3 sampled with controlled condensation method is lower than that with 80% isopropanol absorption method. The method that firstly samples SO3 with 80% isopropanol absorption method, then measures the SO3 concentration with barium perchlorate-thorin method, is simple, fast, accurate, and easy to on-site monitoring.

Key words

selective catalytic reduction (SCR) / denitration / SO3 / sampling / controlled condensation method / 80% isopropanol absorption method

Cite this article

Download Citations
GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, LI Dongmei. Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System[J]. Electric Power Construction. 2013, 34(6): 69-72

References

[1]刘进雄,曾令大.锅炉尾部烟道脱硝技术[C]//2009年火电厂环境保护综合治理技术研讨会论文集. 北京:中国电力杂志社,2009:154-157.

[2]Svachula  J, Alemany U,Ferlazzo N,et al. Oxidation of SO2 to SO3 over honeycomb denoxing catalysts[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem.Res. 1994,33(6):1 644.

[3]Forzattip, Nova I, Beretta A.Catalytic properties in deNOx and SO2-SO3reactions [J].Catalysis Today, 2000, 56 (4):431-441.

[4]Srivastava P K, Miller C A,Erickson C,et al.Emission of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants[J]. Air Waste Manage, 2004, 54(6):750-762.

[5]章新伟, Fuel Tech公司脱硝技术及应用[C]//中电建调试专委会火电厂脱硝技术研讨会论文集.广州:中电建调试专委会,2009.

[6]王智,贾莹光,祁宁.燃煤电站锅炉及SCR脱硝中SO3的生成及危害[J].东北电力技术,2005(9):1-3.

[7]Nervers N D. Air pollution control engineering [M].第2版.北京:麦格劳·希尔 公司,2000:199.

[8]Environmental Protection Agency. EPA METHOD 8-Determination of sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide emissions from stationary sources[S].USA:EPA.

[9]Environmental Protection Agency.EPA METHOD 8A-Determination of sulfuric acid vapor or mist and sulfur dioxide emissions from kraft recovery furnaces[S].USA:EPA.

[10]郭斌.SCR系统的调试、优化及试验[C]//中电建调试专委会火电厂脱硝技术研讨会论文集.广州:中电建调试专委会,2009.

[11]唐志永,金保升,孙克勤,等.湿法脱硫后净烟气酸露点计算公式的比较和评估[J].动力工程,2005(10):18-21.

[12]黄梅芬,沈十林.烟气中二氧化硫及三氧化硫测定方法的研究[J].理化检验:化学分册, 1994,30 (3):138-140.
PDF(534 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/